Place your responce for mariya
Submitted by anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/29/2010 - 08:20
respond here
»
- anonymous's blog
- Login to post comments
English 101: College Composition for the 21st Century |
|
User loginNavigationBradley's BloggingWant to know what I think and write about outside of class? Click here: bleckblog.org.
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1 guest online.
|
Place your responce for mariya
Submitted by anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/29/2010 - 08:20
respond here »
|
“ It is only through literature that one can put oneself in someone else’s shoes and understand the other’s different and contradictory sides and refrain from becoming too ruthless” (118). Azar Nafisi, Reading Lolita in Tehran.
Recent blog postsRecent comments
![]()
|
Response for Marija
The Introduction is a 1. There is an identifiable issue, but it lacks any kind of thesis as well as no passage in the book to link to a video, which also appear to be missing. The intro does present an issue and gives some general background information, but is missing key elements like a thesis, video, and a passage citied from the text.
The focus of the essay does not centered on a video because no video was mentioned. As a result the score is 0. The focus of the essay is more of an extension of the introduction than a statement of points. The body should be explaining the different elements used in a video related to your issue. these elements would also be stated in the thesis.
The conclusion is closer to a 2 than anything else. It does wrap up what was said and begins to make a solid point, but really needs to have that point driven home strongly.
Overall the essay can be improved tremendously by inserting a thesis, video relating to issue, and revovlving the paper around the video's elements will make the essay much more coherent and staright fowrard. Overal all rating is a 1.