English 220 Syllabus

English 220(W): Introduction to Shakespeare

Bradley Bleck
Office: 5-157
Phone: Office 533-3572
Class Time: 11:30-12:35 MTThF
Office Hours: 8:30 to 9:30 a.m. Daily, and by appointment most afternoons
email: bradbATspokanefallsDOTedu

Required Text: Greenblatt, Stephen The Norton Shakespeare: Essential Plays and Sonnets. 2nd ed. You may want to shop online or in local bookstores to buy used and save a good bit of money, but shop early! You can also, if you like, buy the plays and sonnets as published individually from most any bookstore or online. There may be some confusion with regard to line numbering in the plays, and I'm not sure if you will save any money by doing so, but as long as you have what we are reading, it's fine by me.

Official Course Description: Students read, analyze, interpret and evaluate Shakespeare’s plays and also sonnets. In addition, they learn about the historical, cultural and social milieu in which Shakespeare wrote his works. Students develop strategies for breaking Shakespeare’s language barrier and learn to analyze plot, character, imagery and theme. Prerequisite SFCC only: recommended minimum reading placement score: COMPASS 80, ASSET 40.

Unofficial course description: In this class we will read, discuss, and write about Shakespeare and Elizabethan culture. In doing so, we'll examine the role of literature and the shaping of a nation and national identity as it applies to our lives through a look at such things as Puritanism, the Reformation (and Counter Reformation), various English Revolutions, and the role of the arts in cultures. To make this happen, we'll be looking at Shakespeare's drama and sonnets to develop some understanding of our Anglo-Saxon cultural & heritage. We will be exploring a variety of questions, including, but not limited to:

As members of the class, I expect you to completely read all material as assigned prior to listed discussion dates, to have completed journals when assigned, to take part in discussions, to write well developed literature reviews that focus on the readings and topics under discussion and to complete assigned projects. You should budget at least 15 hours a week for the course (10 hours outside of class for reading, writing, and working). We will discuss any relevant topics that come to the fore as a result of reading in this class and you will be allowed similar latitude in your writing. Topics can be personal, historical, political, social, literary, or whatever.

Additionally, when it comes to being good readers, don't think you can read a play or sonnet once and make sense of it. Good readers are re-readers. I suggest, at the very least, when you are assigned a play that you sit down and read the whole thing and that you reread each act the night before it will be discussed in class. This is a bare minimum that probably won't prepare you to succeed on the mid-term and final exams. Annotating the text as you read will also help you understand and remember.

My hope is to help you enjoy and understand Shakespeare, provide you with some tools for increased understanding of the Shakespeare you read (or at least an idea of where to find material that will help you increase your understanding), and help you formulate and express your thoughts--written and spoken--concerning Shakespeare. Keep in mind I am not some Shakespeare oracle. I prefer to explain what people do not understand and to provide background and context for the writings we will read and let you puzzle things out as much as possible. While I will lecture some on important ideas and considerations, don't expect me to explain what writings "mean." I don't have all the answers to what we will read (assuming such answers exist). This does not mean that a piece of literature means whatever you want it to mean; interpretations need to be based on specific elements and their contexts within the text and the forces that led to the production of the text. However, I have considerable experience reading, studying, interpreting, and criticizing literature. This I will share with you.

Grading

Let’s just say I hate grading, period. Grading takes a bunch of the fun out of a class such as this one. When I grade, my approach is to be as friendly a reader/grader as possible and give you the best grade that is reasonable given the work submitted. I also like to keep things simple, but it doesn't quite pan out that way. The two Literature Reviews are 20 percent each/40 percent total; reading Journals are another: 10 percent. Daily Tweets will account for 5 percent. The midterm is 7.5 percent and the final is 15 percent. The midterm drama club presentation is 2.5 percent and the final drama club presentation is 10 percent. Seminar Participation is 2.5 percent each/5 percent total. Reading quizzes account for the final five percent. Quizzes and journals are graded on a percentage scale that converts to a number grade. Lastly, you will earn the bulk of your grade in the latter stages of the class, when you should know more and be able to earn better grades.

Course Objectives: Intro to Shakespeare

Objectives

  1. To increase your understanding, appreciation, and enjoyment of literature in general and Shakespeare in particular;
  2. Use the language and techniques of literary criticism when analyzing Shakespeare's plays and poems;
  3. Develop an appreciation of the skill and creativity of diverse readings of Shakespearean works;
  4. Demonstrate an understanding of Shakespeare, the Elizabethan and contemporary eras through historical, social, cultural, sexual and gendered contexts;
  5. Draw justifiable inferences about other races and/or cultures without stereotyping or use of ethnocentric bias through the study of Shakespeare;
  6. Develop awareness of the implications of race and/or culture when looking at moral problems and societal conflicts as projected through early Shakespeare's writings;
  7. Develop knowledge and understanding of other expressions of diversity such as class, gender, and/or religion in/through Shakespeare's literature;
  8. Listen to and understand individuals and respond respectfully to their points of view;
  9. Enjoy reading and learning about the various scholarly views of Shakespearean scholarship.
I hope to help you enjoy and understand Shakespeare in particular and all Literature literature in general, provide you will some tools for increased understanding of the literature you read (or at least an idea of where to find material that will help you increase your understanding), and help you to formulate and express your thoughts--written and spoken--concerning Shakespeare and other Literature in the future. Keep in mind I am not some oracle of Literature or Shakespeare. I prefer to explain what people do not understand and to provide background and context for the writings we will read and let you puzzle things out as much as possible. Don't expect me to lecture on and explain what writings "mean." I don't have all the answers to what we will read (assuming such answers exist). This does not mean that a piece of literature means whatever you want it to mean; interpretations need to be based on specific elements and their contexts within the text and broader texts. However, I have considerable experience reading, studying, interpreting, and criticizing literature. This I will share with you.

Pass the Class!

You'll do this by reading and re-reading the assigned material, writing literature reviews, writing and responding to journals pretty much daily, passing exams, giving presentations, asking questions and taking part in class discussions. Because passing students receive a writing intensive credit from this class, you cannot pass the course without submitting each of the revisable literature reviews as drafts and finals, undertaking the mandatory revisions (explained later), and successfully completing at least 60 percent of the journals. Missing or failing on any one these elements--essays and more than 40 percent of the journals--means you will fail with a 0.0.

Help You Read and Write Effectively

This also requires that you engage in the writing process, which means having a draft on days they are due, submitting essays for response and grading the day they are due, and revising essays when it is mandatory to do so. All of this requires not just reading the assigned material briefly, once, or not at all, but often several times before it will make sense. Not doing so can lead to failing the class. An ‘F’ on either literature review will result in an ‘F’ for the course.

Build Literacies

A third goal of this course, wrapped up in the course content and its delivery, is increased traditional, cultural, social and technological literacies at both functional and higher levels. Functional literacy in a traditional sense means you can read and write well enough to function effectively in society. In a technological sense it means you are master of the machine rather than the other way around. We'll work toward an critical literacy in a traditional and technological sense. This will give you a greater sense of how rhetoric and technology function to shape society and culture and how you can use them to shape your own place in the world.

Understand the Importance of Being Here

Much of our course’s success depends on the quality of class participation. If you miss a class, you must get information you missed from a classmate or the blog. All students have one-week of personal leave for the quarter, and all absences--excused or unexcused--are equal. Students missing fewer than three classes will have a .3 bonus added to their final grades (assuming that all work and revisions have been turned in, and the final grade at that point is at least 2.0). Students missing three or four days will receive the grade they earn. Students missing more than one week of class will have a .1 deducted from the final grade for each day's absence after the first wee. Two-weeks or more of absences will result in failing the course with an F. If you find this to be objectionable, you have two choices: make it to class or find another class.

Work Effectively with Others

For each assignment, and pretty much every day, in this class you will be working with other students and myself. When doing so, you are to offer constructive feedback to help group members improve the paper they have written. My goal is to help you not only learn to recognize good writing and articulate what makes it so, but to offer help and suggestions on how to improve your classmates' reading and writing and to enable you to learn something about the people in your groups. This creates a community of learners in our classroom where you can learn that written communication is to be read, not just stuffed away in a drawer or to be given to an instructor to be marked up with red ink (Normally I use blue or black on paper). This is also done so you can learn that each member of this class can offer you something to enrich your life and your scholarly pursuits. The rule for responding to the work of others is to do so with honesty (as opposed to being "brutally frank"), respect and courtesy. We are here to help each other improve as readers and writers, not to laugh at or judge each other. I understand that responses from other students are not always the best, but part of the reason we do this is so you are able to give better feedback once you are through with this and other reading/writing classes.

Engage in Self-reflection

I want you to think about what it is you are doing and how you could possibly do it better. In part, this means writing your essays well before the day they are due so you can let your ideas simmer in your mind. This also means not reading the assignments and writing and responding to blogs at the last minute. You will also write a short paragraph (which answers certain assigned questions) at the end of each essay to evaluate your performance and the behaviors during the writing of your essays. This is one way to both learn from your mistakes and avoid repeating them while learning to recognize your strengths as well. I would also like you to consider how your behavior as a student affects others in the class. Respect and courtesy are key. Self-reflection is key to the reading and writing process.

Meeting Course Expectations

There are a good many activities to complete to be successful in this class and to learn as much as you can. All course activities are intended to engage you in the course content, Shakespeare's poems and plays.
  1. Thoroughly read all material as assigned. This means re-reading, often more than once. If you think you can just skim the material right before class and actually learn something, never mind make a contribution to the class, you are mistaken and wasting both your time and mine.
  2. You are expected to "tweet" a question each day regarding the reading. If you cannot come up with a question, you are not thinking enough about what you are reading.
    • Go to twitter.com and create an account for yourself. Please use a name by which we can readily identify you. 
    • Having created your account, request to follow @sfccshakespeare.
    • Before the start of class each day, tweet your question to @sfccshakespeare
    • We'll use these questions to guide our discussion each day. Once you get set up, it will work via your email, phone or on the web.
  3. Each week there will be an informal journal writing assignment over the reading for that week. You are expected to post an original response to the journal assignment and you are expected to respond to at least two other journals and to at least one response to your journal.
  4. You are expected to fully engage in the small and large-group discussions in class. When we act out scenes, you are expected to put your best foot forward. No one is expected to be an accomplished actor. Everyone will at least pretend to be an actor at some point in the class.

General Advice on Politeness and Protocol

I stole these from a Huffington-Post article:

Drama Club Expectations

Normally in a literature class you would read a novel (or some other extended work) and develop a presentation based on the chosen text. In this instance, each drama club group is going to be putting on a class-length performance of a play chosen from those not assigned for whole class reading. You will have class time each week to prepare. Since most of Shakespeare's plays take from three to four hours to perform when unabridged, your task is to boil the play down to something of an essence and perform it. Costumes, props and anything else necessary to the successful staging of a play is what you are expected to cover.

Writing Assignment

The primary thrust of this assignment is to propel you to engage in effective research, to understand the scholarship taking place with regard to what you are writing about, and your demonstrating that you can effectively engage not just the assigned readings, but the scholarship as well. To this end, the writing assignments consist of a mini-literature review.

The Basics

Your essay/literature review must contain the following:

Essay Writing Materials

Workable Writing Process

A Functional Writing Process for this (or any) Class


A Functional
Writing Process for this (or any) Class

Helpful Hints to Think of Before You Begin

  • Set Reasonable Goals: to hold the reader's interest, tell
    a compelling story, to include sensory details in a draft, to maintain a focus
    on what took place, to complete a draft by dinner;
  • Do the Easy Parts First;
  • Make writing a Habit (as long as it is occasional it will
    be awkward and hard);
  • Find a regular Time and Place;
  • Do some Warm-Up Writing before Tackling Your Essay--freewriting;
  • Write Fast;
  • Reward Yourself with Some Short Breaks;
  • If you get stuck, be willing to return to invention strategies
    to generate more ideas.

Prewriting

  1. Decide upon a subject (such as a story about your childhood).
  2. Decide upon a topic using some of the prewriting strategies.

When you have a topic:

  1. Decide on your purpose (rhetorical goal/controlling idea)
    for writing on that topic.
  2. Gather material, using a prewriting/invention strategy.
  3. Select and decide upon best material, which you then organize
    in the most effective manner possible. This is where audience awareness comes
    into play.
  4. Review your pre-writing materials. After giving them a good
    look, put them aside, out of sight. This is a bridge between pre-writing and
    writing.

Drafting

  • Start with a working title. Chances are that if you can't
    come up with some sort of a title you don't know what you want to write about.
    Move on if you are having trouble coming up with a title.
  • You needn't concern yourself with writing the introduction
    first; go right to the heart of the matter and if you need to, right an introduction
    later. When you have a better idea what you are saying, it will be easier
    to introduce the material.
  • Once you begin writing, concentrate on the logical smooth
    flow of ideas and details--move as quickly as possible, with a minimum of
    judgment, while composing the draft. Imagine speaking your draft to someone
    as you compose. You are now forging new and meaningful relations among your
    ideas and information.
  • Your goal with the first draft is to get as much information
    on paper as possible.
  • Ignore spelling, sentence structure, grades, messiness and
    other outside concerns.
  • After you have put all of this to paper, you have completed
    a draft of your essay.

Revision Process

  • It is often best to get some distance between yourself and
    a draft. This entails setting it aside for a day or two. Of course, if you
    are not working ahead you can't do this.
  • Assume new identity: that of reader/editor
  • The process then includes reading your paper to other writers.
    These writers will offer feedback on the strong and weak points they see in
    your paper. You then take this information and use it to improve your essay.
    You will also, if you pay attention, come across strong and weak points in
    the essays that are read to you, and you will be able to use those ideas to
    improve your essay. Have a goal for your revision: clearer, better detail--
  • Make use of the written comments received during peer review.
  • Evaluate your essay before and after going over peer responses.

When on Your Own, Use the Following Revision Process.

  1. First revise for ideas: clarify the main idea. Read through
    your draft. Mark any areas which seem unclear, but don't think about fixing
    them until you've read the whole essay. When finished reading, put the essay
    aside and see if you can write a sentence containing the main idea. Compare
    to the existing thesis/controlling idea. Once you have said it as clear as
    you can, evaluate it for honesty and freshness.
  2. Read the draft again. Evaluate the details. Are they concrete
    and specific? Do they create sensory images? Do they convey the necessary
    message to your audience.
  3. Read the draft again and check the order of your presentation.
    Is it as effective as possible? This is a good place to use outlining.
  4. Revise for word choice. Be sure each word is doing its job
    and carrying its weight. In general, use Anglo-Saxon root words which are
    usually one or two syllables. If you can replace a three-plus syllable word
    with a one or two syllable equivalent, you should do so.
  5. Next revise for mechanics. Use a handbook to check any punctuation
    you are unsure of, or where you commonly make mistakes. This is editing.
  6. Do all of the above as many times as needed.
  • The more you rewrite now, the better you get at it and the
    less you will have to do it in the future.
  • If introduction seems dull, begin with the second paragraph.


Essay Format

Essay Format

General Information Concerning Essay Format

General Format

Titles

Every essay must have a title. The rules for titles are that they use the same font and same font size as the rest of the essay. Capitalize the first, last, and important words in-between. This means you typically capitalize nouns and verbs. You do not capitalize (except if they are the first or last word in the title) articles (the, an, a), prepositions (of, below, near, above, etc.) or conjunctions (and, but, or, etc.). Typically you want the title to contain the main point in the essay, but that point needs to be reduced to three or four words. The title should be centered, but when submitting via email this is often hard to do.

When submitting an essay, the header should look like this:

Your Name

Course

Instructor's Name

Due Date

A Title that Predicts Essay Development

First, every essay will have an introduction, Body, and Conclusion. It is often said that the introduction tells the reader what the essay will tell the reader, the body of the essay tells the reader what the essay is about, and the conclusion tells the reader what the essay just told them.

For the narrative, it might be easier to think of the introduction as the beginning, the body as the middle, and the conclusion as the end.

With the introduction, I am the only reader, as are members of your peer groups, who is required to read your writing. Your job in the first paragraph is to persuade the reader to continue on.

Introduction Basics

  • The Introduction is the first paragraph.
  • Begin with a statement which interests and orients the reader, often referred to as the HOOK.
  • Should introduce topic right away.
  • Should contain thesis statement/controlling idea.

Generalizations about Introductions and Conclusions

  • Need not be parts of the essay indicated by such phrases as "before we begin" or "in conclusion."
  • Introductions and conclusions are more effective if they are thought of in matched pairs.
  • Introductions and conclusions which work in one context can fail in others.

Consider the audience when thinking about the type of introduction/conclusion you are going to use.

  • Introduction should give readers a preview of essay's subject and/or framework. An introduction is not an introduction if it leaves readers clueless about either the subject or the framework.
  • Beginning of the essay introduces the interpreter [author] as well as the interpretation. Present yourself as a person whose judgments and opinions are likely to be valuable.
  • Summarizing in a broad sense is one of the conclusion's main functions. Do not simply restate what you have already said. Rather, place your topic within a larger context.

Introduction and Conclusion Strategies

  • Funnel shaped (inverted pyramid) introduction matched with "web" conclusion. this introduction begins with broad statement related to the topic. Provide background information, each bit more specific than the first--all of which lead to and set up the thesis statement. The Conclusion presents or restates original topic in the context of larger concerns. This is the standard format taught in many writing courses.
  • Build on a scene--show your reader where the narrative will be taking place. Make it interesting. Match with the conclusion built on a parallel scene. This is a particularly good strategy for the narrative essay.
  • Stress the author's attitude in the Introduction, matching that with a conclusion that reflects a change in that attitude--can also deal with emotion, feelings, or ideas.
  • Develop a question in the Introduction matched with a Conclusion that discusses an answer.

Body

  • Develops issues and ideas broached in Introduction.
  • For narrative decide what the climax or high point of the story is and build towards it.

Invention Strategies

How do You Get to a Good Idea?

The progression works like this: I give you a broad subject (tell a story about yourself involving a social issue) and you narrow that down to a topic (working in higher education). That topic must then be narrowed down to something specific element within that topic (teaching with technology perhaps) and then to a specific instance (giving a presentation on the politics of technology that people didn't like). We'll work through this progression in and out of class. Look at the following general guidelines.

  • Strive for the unusual and fresh--the first idea off the top of your head is likely to be trite and dull. Possible example of trite and dull: car crashes and learning how serious driving is.
  • Possible example of fresh: How your driving behavior and attitude towards others changed when you bought an new, late model car.
  • Use your senses.
  • Look at topic from alternative (as in someone other than yourself) points of view.
  • Break stereotypes, unquestioned ideas and slogans. In short, think beyond the obvious.
  • Classify your topic--narrowing in the process.
  • Make bug lists (what really bugs me about this is . . . )

Prewriting/Invention Strategies

You'll find out which of these strategies works best for your by giving them all a try.

Incubation

Jot down ideas whenever they come to you. Compile them for future use. Don't think that you'll remember them if you don't commit them to paper, because you rarely will. Once you jot down the idea, your mind is free to work on it at its own, subconscious leisure. In this way you can arrange your inspiration. Ideas will emerge misshapen and partially developed.

Brainstorming

Talk with a friend or classmate about the assigned topic and what it is you think you need to do. If you have no one around willing to help with this, and you have a tape recorder, talk to the tape recorder for 15 minutes on the subject of your choice and see what kind of topic you come up with.

Clustering

  1. In a word or a phrase, write the topic in the middle of the page and circle it.
  2. Also in a word or a phrase, write down the main parts or central ideas of the topic. Circle these and connect them to the topic in the center.
  3. Generate facts, details, examples, or ideas related in any way to these main parts. Cluster these around the main points.

Listing: works good alone and in groups

  1. Give the list a title that indicates your main idea or topic.
  2. Write as fast as you can, relying on short phrases.
  3. Include anything that seems at all useful. Withhold judgment at this point.
  4. Reflect on the list and organize it to suit your needs.
  5. Put an asterisk by the most promising items.
  6. Number key items in order of importance.
  7. Put items in related groups.
  8. Cross out items that do not seem promising.
  9. Add new items.

Outlining: ordering your lists or clustering topics is a way of outlining

  • Scratch outline: rough list of main points and some sub-points as well:
  • Topic Outlines (written in phrases for each topic):
  • Sentence Outlines (written as complete sentences) follow lettered and numbered format. Sentence outlines are more detailed:

Freewriting/forcedwriting

Sitting down and allowing/forcing yourself to write either on your topic or anything that comes to mind. Freewriting entails sitting down and writing anything about your topic, in the order that it comes out of your brain. You do not edit or censor as your write. Just write without stopping, no matter how silly or off-topic some of the material may seem. Freewriting is often called "forced writing" when done under time constraints. Also called quick drafting--something some students think is a final product. If you stick to your topic, you are Looping.

Writing informally in a journal

Keep a record of interesting impressions, observations, readings, reactions, descriptions, important events and other relevant (to you) experiences. Do not make your journal a record of the day's events: "Dear diary, I got up at seven, had cornflakes for breakfast, and was late getting out the door as I spilled orange juice on the kitchen floor." Instead, record your feelings, thoughts, and ideas: "The same weather beaten woman was standing at the intersection holding out her pandhandling sign. Oddly though, as tends to be the case with her, her clothes were spotless. I wonder how she keeps so clean while living on the street (I assume) and panhandling for a living.

The Pentad: Every human action is influenced by these five elements

  • Act (what): Anything that happens or could happen or is the result of a completed activity.:
  • Scene (where, when): The setting or background of the action;
  • Agent (who): The person or force responsible for or influenced by the action;
  • Agency (how): The method that makes a thing happen;
  • Purpose (why): The reasons or motives for the action.
These elements are useful because they can be used to analyze events, arguments, characters, or audiences, which makes this a particularly effective strategy for narratives, arguments, and the like. They cannot, however, be applied to the analysis of things--such as computers, chairs, or cars.

The Pentad Taken Further

Answering these questions will give you considerable detail for a narrative essay. Develop the answers as fully as possible and you will go a long way toward completing your narrative essay.

  • What is the person doing?
  • How did he/she get involved?
  • What is the person trying to accomplish?
  • How will the person accomplish these goals?
  • What obstacles does the person face?
  • What action is the person trying to take?
  • What other actions are possible?
  • How does the setting, the time of the and others involved in it affect the person's actions?

Cubing

Examining a subject from six perspectives (a cube has six sides). Works best with objects. Does not work as well with human action.
  • Describe the subject. What is its content?
  • Compare it. What is it similar to, different from?
  • Associate it. What does it remind you of?
  • Analyze it. Explain how it was made/came to be.
  • Apply it. Explain how it can be used.
  • Argue for or against it. Take a stand.

Aristotelian Argument Format

Aristotelian Argument Format

  • Introduction

    (includes one or more of the following)

    1. Exordium: The beginning or opening words, designed to win attention and good will by introducing the case in an interesting and favorable light.
    2. Exposition or Narration: An account of the history of the case (what gave rise to the present problem; how the issues developed)
    3. Direct statement of the case (the proposition to be proved or defended--thesis).
    4. Division of Proofs: An outline of how the writer will present the evidence

    Body

    (includes the following)

  • Confirmation of case by presenting evidence in its favor (includes one or more of the following):
    1. facts
    2. reasons
    3. statistics
    4. testimony of experts
    5. opinions supported by facts
    6. reports
    7. examples
    8. logical reasoning (inductive or deductive)
    9. analogy
  • Acknowledge merit of opposing view
  • Refutation of opposing views by demonstrating that they are:
    1. untrue
    2. illogical
    3. self-contradictory
    4. ambiguous (terms not clearly defined)
    5. dishonest ( a deliberate attempt to deceive)
    6. absurd

    Conclusion

    (includes one or more of the following)

    1. Recapitulation and summary of argument: to repeat is to reinforce and make certain readers have not misunderstood.
    2. Peroration: A final, heightened appeal for support.
    3. Propose a solution.

Argument Advice and Guidelines

Argument Advice and Guidelines

Argument is concerned with questions of judgment, not taste

  • Judgment is joined to the logical and reasonable
  • It's best to reveal points often overlooked
  • It's a good idea to define your terms so your audience
    knows exactly what you are talking about. [consult a
    dictionary if you need]

Having a Debatable Point

  • You need an argumentative edge.
  • The main point/assertion--Thesis statement--must be open
    to dispute and able to be viewed from more than one side.
  • Statements of fact are not debatable, neither are
    statements about personal tastes and preferences.
  • A point is Debatable if no amount of reasoning by an
    expert or support by statistics can prove the truth or
    fallacy of the statement.

Supporting the Claim

  • Offer the reader convincing reasons why your position is
    X because of Y.
  • Choose reasons carefully to move your audience
  • If you use outside sources (as this assignment requires),
    choose reliable and authoritative ones.
  • Use hard evidence [facts] and not soft evidence
    [opinion].
  • Conclusions based on soft evidence will often not stand
    up to scrutiny.

To Argue a Point Persuasively You Must do the Following

  • Offer convincing reasons
  • Arguments only as good as the reasons used to support it.
  • You have to make your readers agree with you, or at least
    see the point you are making
  • Use only the best evidence.

Appeal to Reason

Induction

  • Often you will use induction to reach a generalization
    [informed opinion] and then that generalization can be
    used deductively to reach a conclusion.
  • The major premise must be acceptable, minor premise must
    be verifiable, and the argument is not overstated.
  • Induction is from Latin inducere for "to lead,"
    to draw along: reasoning from specific evidence to a
    general conclusion to move from the specific instances to
    the generalizations necessary to make a point and to
    establish the cause or causes of something.
  • The act, process, or result or an instance of reasoning
    from a part to a whole, from particulars to generals or
    from the individual to the universal. Specific instances
    which lead to a generalization.
  • Don't make generalizations too sweeping.

Deduction

  • Applying a proven generalization to a specific case,
    using generalizations to arrive at a specific conclusion.
    .
  • The conclusion is arrived at inductively, so induction is
    used often times to set up deductive arguments.
  • The generalization must be accepted and the specific
    instance must be a fact for the conclusion to be
    accurate.
  • Illogical deductive arguments usually result from a
    faulty major premise or inaccurate generalization.

Syllogism

  • Syllogism comes from the Greek "syllogismos"
    for 'to calculate with words'.
  • A deductive scheme of formal argument consisting of a
    major premise, a minor premise and a conclusion.
  • Moves from general to specific. major premise

Syllogism

If 'A' is True Major Premise/

Generalization
All Humans are Mortal Every Virtue is Laudable
And 'B' is True Minor Premise/

Specific Instance
John is a Human Kindness is a Virtue
'C' Must be True Conclusion John is Mortal Kindness is Laudable

Toulmin Model

  • Combination of inductive and deductive reasoning schemes.
  • Concerned more with probability than certainty. See the
    following examples.

    Claim

  • Equivalent to the conclusion or what the writer wants to
    prove;

    Data

  • The information or evidence a writer offers in support of
    the claim;

    Warrant

  • A general statement that establishes a trustworthy
    relationship between the data and the claim. Leads to
    conclusion that is probably true.
  • Claim and data must be specific/explicit

    Assumptions
    underlie this warrant

  • (such as that the data is valid)
  • Be prepared to back up warrant.

Toulmin Model of Logic

Claim Conclusion Raymond is an American citizen
Data Minor Premise Raymond was born in Puerto Rico
Warrant Major Premise Anyone born in Puerto Rico is an
American citizen

The warrant is false because a French tourist who has a child
while vacatioining in Puerto Rico may chose between American and
French citizenship for their child.

Claim Conclusion Raymond is probably an American
citizen
Data Minor Premise Raymond was born in Puerto Rico
Warrant Major Premise Anyone born in Puerto Rico is entitled
to American citizenship

Here the warrant is accurate given the above information and
the reasoning is logical given the information. The warrant
establishes a trustworthy relationship between the Data and the
Claim.


Distinguish Hard from Soft Evidence

  • Hard evidence equal facts; soft evidence consists of
    opinion.
  • Base conclusions on hard evidence.
  • Avoid showy, deceptive conclusions These seem correct at
    first, but rarely are. Often based on soft evidence or
    ignores important variables--which is why scientific
    studies are done in several populations and placebos are
    given.

Avoid Faulty Generalizations

  • Something true in one case need not be true in all cases:
    Blondes have more fun, television is worthless, money
    buys happiness.
  • Often these are stereotypes.
  • Often are based on insufficient or irrelevant evidence or
    they are too broad and sweeping
  • Often these faulty generalizations are based on
    stereotypes.

Avoid Begging the Question

  • Happens when you assume that a debate's premise
    underlying your assertion has already been demonstrated
    to be true, so you beg your reader to take your word for
    it, trust me you say.
  • You assume what you are arguing to be the case can be
    used as evidence to make that case.
  • Occurs when you assume that a debatable premise
    underlying the point you want to make has already been
    proven.
  • These arguments assume that what the arguer is supposed
    to be proving is already accepted as having been proven.

Avoid Avoiding the Question

  • Often done with an emotional appeal to distract reader
    from the real issue.
  • An appeal to pity, fear, normalcy, flattery, patriotism,
    or snob appeal.
  • Avoids the real issue with material that is irrelevant or
    which clouds the issue by making an irrational appeal to
    the emotions.

Avoid Bandwagon Approach

  • Everyone is doing it, why can't I? Gets readers to agree
    by claiming that everyone else agrees.
  • Following the crowd avoids the real issue.

Avoid Attacking the Opponent

  • Name calling or other derogatory statements about their
    character ignores the real question and exposes a weak
    position.

Avoid Faulty Causal Argument

  • Causes can have more than one effect, so make sure the
    link is solid and demonstrable.
  • Often the result of oversimplification, suggesting
    relationships that don't exist, the ignoring of evidence
    which may run counter to the argument being made, and
    denying the real reasons.

Avoid Imposing Either/Or Fallacy

  • Leaves out all but the extremes of thespectrum.
  • Occurs when the issue is reduced to the two extremes.
  • Eliminates all middle ground because you are either for
    or against.

Proper Appeals to Emotion

  • Such emotional appeals require showing empathy and
    identifying with your reader's feelings.
  • Identify with your opposition's feelings and point of
    view.

Acknowledge Opposing Views

  • Show respect for the opposition and what is valid about
    their argument.
  • Acknowledge the merit of other opinions.

Maintain a Moderate Tone

  • When you act like you are the only authority, then many
    people will be turned off by what you have to say no
    matter how valid and important your material.
  • Don't be belligerent, telling anyone who doesn't side
    with you that they are fools and being duped by the
    opposition.

Recognizing Flaws in Persuasion and Argument

Bogus Claims

  • Claims are bogus or false when the persuader promises
    more than he or she can prove beyond dispute.

Loaded Terms

  • Terms are loaded when they are asked to carry more
    emotional weight than the context can legitimately
    support: Bush regime, Marxist President Salvador Allende,
    Unnecessary adjectives wealthy candidate used to turn the
    unwealthy away from the candidate.

Misrepresentation

  • Lies, twisting what others have said through
    oversimplification
  • Complex argument reduced to ridicule--ask for evidence to
    support claims.
  • Use quotes within their context.

The above Three Terms Represent the Qualities of Propaganda.

Evaluating Sources

Evaluating Source Materials

What Are Outisde Sources?

Outside sources are materials that come from somewhere other than your memory or direct experience. These outside sources often makeup what is considered hard evidence in an argumentative, or other, research essay. These sources include, but are not limited to, books, magazines, academic or professional journals, radio and television shows, films, and the testimony of experts.

How is Reliability and Authority Evaluated in a Source?

Like many things, authority and reliability depends on the source. Because, as a writer, you want to maintain a moderate tone and not drive your readers away, you have to choose your sources wisely. If you were to write an essay about animal testing, there are three (at least) sources of printed information available.

One of the sources is the Humane Society of the United States. The HSUS is a fairly mainstream, conservative organiazation. They tend to work behind the scenes in a low key way. HSUS runs animal shelters, spay and neuter programs, and looks into the treatment of both livestock and pets. The HSUS also engages in traditional political actions such as lobbying Congress.

Another organization and source of information on animals is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. PETA is a bit more high profile than HSUS and many prominent people are members. If you have seen the "Don't Wear Fur" campaign where a group of models and moviestars stand behind a banner bearing that proclamation, you have seen some of the information PETA puts out. They are more activist and outspoken than the HSUS, but tend to have pretty much the same goals and act within the law.

Also among those advocating animal rights is the Animal Liberation Front. ALF is among the more radical of animal rights organizations, and if you believe the newspaper reports, they are also more likely to act outside of the law. If you have read stories in the paper about break-ins at research labs where animals are set free, someone holding philosophies similar to ALF's may well have been involved.

These characterizations are meant to show that while people and organizations can have similar goals, they can also have different approaches to achieving those goals. These approaches are products of the biases we all have. As a writer you need to be aware of the biases your sources have. If you are not aware of the biases, your argument may end up being undermined by them. If you are writing an argument to support a ban on animal testing and you know your audience wants to continue testing, which source of information might be the most likely to sway their opinion? The radical or the mainstream? The moderate or the in-your-face? If you can get the same information from a more conservative source, it may have a greater effect on your audience.

More on Reliability and Authority

There are three general categories of journals and magazines and you should understand how they are different.

The first category is written by a generalist for the general public. General consumption news and entertainment magazines fit into this category. Often the writer is someone with no specific training or experience in the topic they are writing about. In a sense they become "instant experts" on their topic as they compose the essay or article. Publications such as Time, Newsweek, Rolling Stone, Ebony, and Esquire fit into this category. These publications will typically contain a good deal of advertising. These publications rely on advertising dollars to sustain themselves and they are in business to turn a profit as well as provide the public with information.

The second category is written by an expert for the general public. This expert may not have specific training in their topic but they may have devoted their career to writing about certain issues, or they may be a professional intheir field but prefer to write to a general audience rather than to or for their peers. Publications such as the Smithsonian, Psychology Today and National Geographic can be considered to fit into this category. These publications usually rely more on subscription dollars than advertising dollars to continue their existance, but there will be some advertising, usually concentrated in the front of the publication.

The third category is written by an expert for other experts. These are typically professional and academic journals. Titles include College English, Teaching English In a Two Year College, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Lancet (the British version of JAMA), and many more too numerous to list. A quick trip through the library will provide you a quick glimpse of what is available. These publications are nearly devoid of advertising and those advertisements that are there usually are for textbooks and professional studies related to the field that the journal covers. Also, while publication in the first two categories requires the writer to simply please the editor, publication in professional and academic journals requires peer review. Peer review means that the essay was sent to the editor, who inturn sent the essay to reviewers, who critique the manuscript and send it back to the editor and writer for revision. These cycle can be repeated. Essays in professional journals will also contain a complete list of source materials where the articles and essays in the first two categories may or may not name their sources.

Books or Magazines: Which Way Should You Go?

Journals and Magazines are typically more current than books, often making them a better source of information. They also do not require you to read a whole book to get the little bits of information you might be looking for. By the time a book reaches the shelves of a library, it may be as much as two or three years behind current scholarship on the topic. There is a long process of researach, writing, and revision before a book even reaches the mechancial publishing stage where type setting, galley proofing, final publication and distribution can take at least six months. The general rule of thumb is don't use any source that is older than 10 years unless it is a piece of work absolutely critical to a particular field's scholarship.

How About Personal Interviews?

Pesornal Interviews are often one good way to get the testimony of experts. Of course, as you can see by watching news coverage of any trial, you can find an expert to say just about anything you need to be said. Lawyers are a good example to illustrate this: Lawyers are experts in the field of law, but for every lawyer who wins a case, and has presumably made the proper judgement about the law and circumstances in question, there is a lawyer who loses that same case who made a less valid interpretation of the same circumstances.

How About the Internet as a Source?

You've likely heard all of the hype about the Information Superhighway that is the World Wide Web and Internet. And there is as much good information out on the Web as many Net-heads say. However, there is at least as much garbage out on the Web as there is useful information. The problem then becomes how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly. Remember that anyone can put up a web site. AS with any other form of publication there are no editors. Once in awhile aservice provider won't allow certain material on their machines, but that is rare. On the Web, be extra critical of what you see. Along with solid information and scholarship, there are a lot of wackos out there. If you are not sure about the material you find at web sites, use the questioning strategies in the following two links to give you a better idea about the material on any given web site.

Statistics? You Want to Use Statistics?

Mark Twain said "There are lies, damned lies, and statistics." A more recent maxim about statistics is that they are like bikinis: Interesting for what they reveal, but essential for what they cover up. Keep both of these points in mind as you provide your reader with statistics to clarify or support a point in your essay. While statistics can bring certain parts of an argument to light, don't rely on them to make your argument for you and don't use so many of them as to make your essay read like a spread sheet. Your reader won't get your argument if they fall asleep!

Paragraph Guidelines

Paragraph Guidelines

Paragraph Function

Paragraphs give the writer control and the reader access. Paragraphs are often seen as one distinct space for developing one distinct idea.

Length

Depends on writer's purpose and reader's needs. One word to ?

Short paragraphs make for quicker reading, but a choppier flow often results.

Topic Statement

Thesis statement for a paragraph. Asserts a sub-point of the main thesis point. Used to orient the reader to what comes next. Orients the writer to what you are going to say next.

Paragraphs Require

  • Distribution into sentences: Whether there are two or twenty sentences in a paragrah, the sentences must be coherent if you want to have a coherent paragraph.
  • Explicit reference: The bearing of each sentence in the paragraph on the sentences that come before needs to be explicit.
  • Parallel construction: When consecutive sentences illustrate the same idea, they should, as far as possible, be formed alike using parallel contructions.
  • Indication of theme: The opening sentence, unless obviously prepatory, is expected to indicate the scope and subject of the paragraph.
  • Unity: Unity implies a sustained purpose. Sentences should posses a unity that implies a clarity of purpose and forbids digression.
  • Consecutive Arrangement: Related topics should be kept close together. Each sentence should follow the plan of the paragraph in its appropriate place.
  • Marking of subordination: Principle and subordinate elements should have their relative importance clearly indicated.
  • For increased coherence: Repeat key words and phrases.

Updated Version of Paragraph Requirements

  • There must be a central topic idea.
  • Topic development is limited to the paragraph in which the topic is broached.
  • The topic sentence must express the topic idea.
  • Each paragraph must be at least one sentence or a series of sentences.

In each Paragraph, be Conscious of the Ordering of Ideas

  • general to specific: Think of yourself as a camera zooming in on the topic and its details.
  • specific to general: Think of yourself as a camera pulling back from the closeup to get a wider shot.
  • emphatic order (of importance): Could go from most-to-least or least-to-most. It's best to conclude with the information you want to remain most strongly with your reader.
  • spatial: Choose a direction and stick with it. Work from top to bottom, bottom to top, left to right, or what have you.
  • chronological: Begin with what happened first and take it from there.

Most importantly, be consistent with whatever ordering strategy you choose!

Making use of the Toulmin Model of Logic

  • Provide your reader with some general discussion of a point that supports the essay's thesis.
  • Provide an explicit/specific example/detail to illustrate the general discussion.
  • Explain in a few sentences how the explicit/specific example/detail supports the essay's thesis.

Paragraph Elements

General statements: One way to get this sort of information is to visit the DPA website. The site provides factual information about the waste of money that the war on drugs is seen to be. This information can by found by clicking on the “War on Drugs” link along the left hand side of the page. Specific Example(s):Following this link, a reader will find information on the millions of dollars sent to Colombia as part of the war on drugs and how this money is used. The page found by following this link contains such details as how many American soldiers are serving as “Advisers” to the Colombian military, how many helicopters we have sent them, and what those advisers are and are not allowed to do, such as engage in firefights will rebel soldiers and drug growers. Explanatory Link back to thesis: Without this sort of information the American people would not be adequately informed by their government or main stream news media because the issue is complicated and complicated issues don’t get covered well in 30 second sound bites on tv or radio.

Thesis Guidelines and General Examples

Thesis Guidelines

Thesis Guidelines and Examples

  • "Thesis" comes from a Greek word meaning "the act of laying down"
  • A thesis is a proposition that a writera dvances and offers to maintain by argument.
  • A thesis is a concise statement of what the reader should come to believe.
  • A thesis cannot be a statement of fact; it must have an argumentative edge.

A thesis cannot be a sentence fragment; it must be a complete sentence.

poor: How life is in a ghetto.

better: Residents of a ghetto tend to have a higher death rate, a higher infant mortality rate, and a higher unemployment rate than do residents of the suburbs.

A thesis must not be worded as a question. (Usually the answer to a question could be a thesis.)

poor: Do Americans really need large refrigerators?

better: If Americans did their marketing daily, as do most Europeans, they could save energy because they could use smaller refrigerators.

A thesis must not be too broad.

poor: The literature of mythology contains many resurrection stories.

better: One of the oldest resurrection myths is the story of the Egyptian god Osiris.

A thesis should not contain unrelated elements.

poor: All novelists seek the truth, and some novelists are good psychologists.

better: In their attempt to probe human nature, many novelist become excellent psychologists.

A thesis should not contain phrases such as "I think" or "in my opinion" because they weaken the writer's argument.

poor: In my opinion public buildings should be required by law to have no-smoking zones because of the adverse effects on health of "passive smoke."

better: Public buildings should be required by law to have no-smoking zones because of the adverse effects on health of "passive smoking."

A thesis should not be expressed in vague language.

poor: Religion as part of the school curriculum should be avoided because it can cause trouble.

better: Religion as part of the school curriculum should be avoided because each student in a classroom may have a different religion.

A thesis must not be expressed in muddled or incoherent language.

poor: Homosexuality is a status offense to the effect that the participants are willing so that the relationship is voluntary in character rather than the type described in a victim-perpetrator model.

better: Homosexuality between consenting adults should be considered an alternate life-style rather than a crime.

A thesis should not be expressed in figurative language.

poor: The Amazons of today are trying to purge all the stag words from the language.

better: Feminists are trying to eliminate the use of sex-biased words from public documents and publications.

Thesis Composing Process

Composing A Thesis

One Way to Compose A Thesis

Use this process as one way that you can narrow the focus of your essay and come up with something approaching a workable thesis statement.

Subject

The Subject of your essay will typically be part of the assignment. In your first essay (the narrative), the subject was you--the writer. With this second essay, the subject is how someone in your life is important to you.

Topic

Having chosen your subject, the next step is finding a topic that meets the requirements of the assignment. With the narrative you needed to tell a story about yourself that was interesting or important and helped make you the person you are today. Some have written about a parent's illness, mishaps with the police, an accident involving their child, and so on.

With the second assignment you are to make some point about a particular person and their importance in your life.

For the third assignment, let us look at the treatment of the nuclear power industry on the Internet. Notice how we have narrowed the topic from a social issue and its treatment on the Internet to a specific topic: the treatment of the nuclear power industry on the Internet. The next step is developing a purpose for the essay.

Purpose Statement

The essay's purpose is what was referred to as the 'rhetorical goal' in the first assignment's readings. Establishing this goal may be the most important step of composing the essay. Without this goal, it is difficult, if not impossible, to make decisions about such things as whether the chosen details are relevant, whether the essay makes the point you hope for, or whether you are done or not. This is where a purpose statement comes in handy.

Try writing a statement something like this: "The purpose of my essay is to show my classmates and teacher (your intended or assigned audience) that such and such is true." An example follows.

  • The purpose of my essay is to show my classmates and teacher how my father's father is an inspiration to me because of the way he was able to overcome much of the racial prejudice he faced in his life without becoming embittered.
  • The purpose of my essay is to show my classmates and teacher that the Declaration of Independence is a finely crafted document that offers insight to the social and cultural views of the writers, and not just their political views.
  • The purpose of my essay is to show my classmates and teacher that the information on the Internet and World Wide Web concerning the nuclear power industry is unbalanced and those who are pro-nuclear power owe it to the public to provide relevant information in support of the nuclear power industry. To do this, I'll have to describe what the web sites that are pro-nuclear contain while making it clear that they are inadequate to the job.

Thesis

To get a thesis statement from a purpose statment, simply omit the first section of the purpose statement:

  • "The purpose of my essay is to show my classmates and teacher that the information on the Internet and World Wide Web concerning the nuclear power industry is unbalanced and those who are pro-nuclear power owe it to the public to provide relevant information in support of the nuclear power industry."

This leaves us with a thesis statement:

  • "The information on [some particular website found on] the Internet and World Wide Web concerning the nuclear power industry is unbalanced and those who are pro-nuclear power owe it to the public to provide relevant information in support of the nuclear power industry."

This is a statement that readers will most likely either agree or disagree with. Such a thesis statement puts the writer in the place of having to prove their point. The writer and reader can also evaluate each piece of support material in relation to the thesis to gauge its relevancy and importance to the essay and the essay's argument.

 

Tying Evidence to Thesis

When writing an essay that makes a point, that point is typically expressed in the essay's thesis statement. For this course, that thesis is also referred to as the essay's goal, the essay's claim, the essay's controlling idea, or the point of the essay. If you are unsure about your essay’s goal, then check the file "One way to compose a thesis" that includes this material.

Because this thesis is the point that the essay seeks to make or discuss, the material presented in the essay, the evidence and details, should all work to support the thesis. If the evidence/detail does not support the thesis, then it most likely should be cut from the essay.

Often the best way to know if the evidence supports the claim is to explain how the evidence supports the claim. If you cannot construct this explanatory link between the evidence and claim, then it is not likely your reader will either. As the writer, it is your job to construct the links between your evidence and your claims. It is your job to make it as easy as possible for the reader see things your way.

Providing this explanatory link between your data and claim forces the reader to see things your way, at least for as long as they are reading the essay. If you do not provide this link, then either your reader will not make the link you are hoping for or they won't even try to make any link. When you provide the link, as the writer, you have greater control over the response of the reader.

In brief, a outline of the essay would look like this:

  1. Introduction
    • thesis
  2. point 1 generalization and evidence
    • explanation as to how evidence supports thesis in the same paragraph
  3. point 2 generalization and evidence
    • explanation as to how evidence supports thesis in the same paragraph
  4. point 3 generalization and evidence
    • explanation as to how evidence supports thesis in the same paragraph and so on until the conclusion

  5. Provide as many points as necessary within the assigned length of the essay.
  6. Conclusion that drives home the point of the essay
  7. Keep this in mind as you are working on the essay and revisions.

    Citation Guidelines

    Modern Language Association Stylesheet

     


    Newspaper || Magazines || Journals || Books || Anthologies || References || Electronic Sources


    NEWSPAPER

    Unsigned Article

    On the Works Cited page, give the title of the article "in quotes," the name of the newspaper underlined or italicized, the day, month, and year if the article's publication, a colon, and the section and page's name underlined or italicized, the volume number, the year (in parentheses), and the inclusive page numbers of the article.

    Smith, John. "The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts." Psychology Today Jan. - Feb. 1996: 23-25.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and page number on which the quoted material appears in the journal.

    (Smith 24)

     

    Signed Article

    On the Works Cited page, do the same as above but put the author’s name first. Note that the name is in reverse order. Also note that if the newspaper’s name does not give the city of origin, you put the city in [brackets] after the name.

    Smith, John. “The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts.” Daily Bugle [Los Angeles] 29 Feb. 1996: A1+.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author’s last name and the section and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the paper.

    (Smith A1)

    Back to Top

    MAGAZINES

    Weekly

    On the Works Cited page, give the author’s name, the title of the article “in quotes,” the name of the magazine underlined or italicized, the day, month and year of the article’s publication , a colon, and the inclusive page numbers of the article.

    Smith, John. “The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts.” Newsweek 29 Feb.

    1996: 23-25.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author’s last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the magazine.

    (Smith 23)

    Monthly

    On the Works Cited page, give the author’s name, the title of the article “in quotes,” the name of the magazine underlined or italicized, the months and year of the article’s publication, a colon, and the inclusive page numbers of the article.

    Smith, John. “The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts.” Texas Monthly Feb. 1996: 23-25

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author’s last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the magazine.

    (Smith 24)

    Bimonthly

    On the Works Cited page, give the author’s name, the title of the article “in quotes,” the name of the magazine underlined or italicized, the months and year of the article’s publication, a colon, and the inclusive page numbers of the article.

    Smith, John. “The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts.” Psychology Today Jan. - Feb. 1996: 23-25

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author’s last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the magazine.

    (Smith 24)

     

    Back to Top

    JOURNALS

    Journal with Continuous Pagination

    On Works Cited page, give the author’s name, the title of article "in quotes," the journal’s name underlined or italicized, the volume number, the year (in parentheses), and the inclusive page numbers of the article.

    Smith, John. "The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts." Journal for the Spread of Peanut Butter 22 (1996): 23-25.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author’s last name and page number on which the quoted material appears in the journal.

    (Smith 24)

    Journal Paging each Issue Separately

    After giving the journal’s name, include volume number and issue number, year (in parentheses), and page numbers.

    Smith, John. "The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts." Journal for the Spread of Peanut Butter 22.3 (1996) : 23-25.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author’s last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the journal.

    (Smith 24)

    Journal that Uses only Issue Numbers

    After giving the journal’s name, include issue number, year (in parentheses), and page numbers.

    Smith, John. "The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts." Journal for the Spread of

    Peanut Butter 3 (1996) : 23-25.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author’s last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the journal.

    (Smith 24)

    Journal Paging each Issue Separately

    After giving the journal's name, include volume number and issue number, year (in parentheses), and page numbers.

    Smith, John. "The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts." Journal for the Spread of Peanut Butter 22.3 (1996) : 23-25.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the journal.

    (Smith 24)

    Back to Top

    BOOK

    One Author

    On the Works Cited page, give the author's name, the book's title underlined or italicized, the city of publication, a colon, the publisher, and the year of publication.

    Smith , John. The Great Peanut Butter War. New York: Houghton, 1996.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.

    (Smith 24)

    Two or Three Authors

    On the Works Cited page give the names of the authors in the order presented on the cover. All other information is the same as with one author. Note that the second author's name is not reversed.

    Smith, John, and Jane Doe. The Great Peanut Butter War Revisited. New York: Houghton, 1996.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last names and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.

    (Smith and Does 24)

    More than Three Authors

    On the Works Cited page, give only the name of the first author and then the designation et al. To stand for the others. All other information is the same as with one author. Note that if a subtitles given on the cover, it appears after the main title, separated by a colon.

    Smith, John, et. al. The Great Peanut Butter War: The Jelly and Honey Battles. New York: Houghton, 1996.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name, the designation et al., and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.

    (Smith et al. 24)

    Back to Top

    ANTHOLOGY

    On the Works Cited page, give the author’s name, the title of work ("in quotes" if it is a short story, poem, or essay; underlined or italicized if it is the name of a novel or a play), the title of the anthology underlined or italicized, the editor of anthology, the volume number (if necessary), the city of publication, a colon, the publisher, the year of publication, and inclusive page numbers of the work as it appears in the anthology.

    Smith, John. "Ode to Peanut Butter." The Norton Anthology of Peanut Butter Literature. Ed. P. Brittle. Vol. 2. New York: Houghton, 1996. 34-36.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.

    (Smith 35)

    Back to Top

    REFERENCE SOURCES

    Signed Article

    For a reprinted article excerpt in Contemporary Literary Criticism, Twentieth Century Literary Criticism, Nineteenth Century Literary Criticism, Short Story Criticism, Poetry Criticism, Drama Criticism, Literary Criticism from 1400 to 1800, and Classical and Medieval Literary Criticism, use the anthology format.

    Bayley, John. "Return of the Native." Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Jean C. Stine and Daniel Marowski. Vol. 31. Detroit: Gale, 1985. 260-261.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.

    (Bayley 260)

    For signed articles in the Dictionary of Literary Biography follow the anthology format.

    Keating, H. R. F. "Agatha Christie." Dictionary of Literary Biography. Ed. Bernard Benstock and Thomas F. Staley. Vol. 27. Detroit: Gale, 1989. 68-82.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.

    (Keating 68)

    To cite articles from the Opposing Viewpoint series include the name of the author of the article, title of article "in quotation marks," series title underlined or italicized, editor, place of publication, publisher’s name and year of publication, and page numbers for article you are citing.

    Sullum, Jacob. "The Death Penalty Is Just." The Death Penalty: Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Carol Wekesser. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1991. 57-60.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.

    (Sullum 57)

    Unsigned Article

    For unsigned biographical information in CLC, TCLC, NCLC, SSC, PC, LC,CMLC, use the following format.

    "Czeslaw Milosz." Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Jean C. Stine and Daniel G. Marowski. Vol. 31. Detroit: Gale, 1985. 258-259.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the title of the entry "in quotes" and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.

    ("Czeslaw Milosz" 258)

    For unsigned articles in Contemporary Authors use the following format.

    "Joel Williamson." Contemporary Authors. Ed. Donna Olendorf. Vol. 144. Detroit: Gale, 1994. 487

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the title of the entry "in quotes" and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.

    ("Joel Williamson" 487)

    For unsigned articles in Contemporary Authors New Revision Series use the following format.

    "Maud Hart Lovelace." Contemporary Authors New Revision Series. Ed. Susan M. Trosky. Vol. 39 Detroit: Gale, 1992. 240-241.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the title of the entry "in quotes" and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.

    ("Maud Hart Lovelace." 240)

    Back to Top

    ELECTRONIC SOURCES

    WWW (World Wide Web) Sites

    To cite files from the World Wide give the author's name (if known), the full title of the web page quoted from "in quotation marks," the title of the web site's homepage (from the window bar) underlined or in italics, the full http address, and the date of visit (in parentheses).

    American Dental Association. "Fluorides and Fluoridation." Facts About Fluoride.Http://www.ada.org/consumer/fluoride/articles/fa01.html. (10 Feb. 1997).

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name ( or an abbreviation if written by a corporate author with a long name) and the page number on which the quoted material appears on a printout of the web page. Look at the beginning of the web page or at the very end (see whose name follows the © symbol) to locate the author.

    (American Dental Association 2)

    Expanded Academic ASAP

    Entries from an electronic online journal should include: name of the author (if given), title of the document "in quotation marks," title of the journal underlined or italicized, volume number, issue number or the identifying number, year or date of publication (in parentheses), number of pages or paragraphs (if given) or n.pag ("no pagination"), publication medium (Online), name of the computer network, and date of access.

    Galston, William. "Divorce American Style." The Public Interest 124 (Summer 1996) : 15 pp. Online. Expanded Academic ASAP. 11 Feb. 1997.

    When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the printout of the information.

    (Galston 3)

    Back to Top


    Thanks to Todd Moffett of the English Department at The Community College of Southern Nevada for this material.

    Conducting Research Online

    This assignment calls for the use of outside research. Thankfully the library at SFCC has a lot of online resources. You will need to log-in to use these resources. Typically your user name will be your student number.

    SFCC Library: Electronic Resources contains a database called ProQuest. proQuest contains magazine and journal articles of a more scholarly sort. You can start your search by using your author's name and then narrow it down from there if necessary. The best articles, the most reliable information, is found in the scholarly publications. Trade magazines can be good, as can magazines in general. newspapers tend to be the least helpful, but you never know. Click on the Proquest link found on the Electronic Resources page.

    Literary Databases also contain a good deal of relevant information on the various authors. Within these articles, you may find some information relating to some point you are working to develop.

    SFCC's Book Catalog may also be of help, but you'll want to get to campus to pick up books. I'm not sure how fast they are about getting books out to rural areas.

    Essay Draft Response Questions

    Essay Peer Draft Evaluation Questions

    Answer each of the below questions for essays written by each of your book club members (the five member group(s) need respond to just three of their group members' essays--just be sure everyone gets three). Please complete your responses by the stated deadline.


    • What about the introduction interests and orients you as a reader? At this point, why would you (not) continue reading this essay if you did not have to? Is there a particular introduction strategy you can recommend to the writer, such as an anecdote, a history of the issue, something along those lines, that might better get a reader's attention and provide an indication of the topic and where the essay will be going? If so, provide that suggestion.
    • Write down what you see as the essay's thesis. Why is the thesis appropriate for the assignment? Explain what you see about the point as being debatable.
    • Can you suggest a way to better focus the topic and thesis? Is this a fresh/engaging look at the topic? If not, suggest a fresh perspective to the writer.
    • Based on your reading of the essay, what needs to be emphasized?
    • Based on your reading of the essay, what seems to be missing or understated?
    • Based on your reading of the essay, what is hinted at but not made clear? How might this material be made clearer? Give the writer some suggestions if this need exists.
    • What evidence (from either the text or the expected research) in the paper supports the writer's assertions? How well does the writer make use of this evidence? Do you see any logical inconsistencies regarding the use of evidence? If so, offer a way to correct those you see.
    • Explain why/how the writer does (not) persuade you to accept their point.
    • Are there any mechanical errors that need revision? Show the author the most glaring errors. However, do not edit the paper for them.
    • If you were to change one thing in this paper, suggest that change to the writer.

    Literary Theories

    These brief encapsulations of several literary theories might provide a way for you to look at your chosen text beyond the general assignment tasks.

    Pragmatism is a collection of many different ways of thinking. Most of the thinkers who describe themselves as pragmatists point to some connection with practical consequences or real effects as vital components of both meaning and truth. Some pragmatists object to the view that beliefs represent reality and argue that beliefs are dispositions which qualify as true or false depending on how helpful a disposition proves in accomplishing the believer's goals. For this type of pragmatist it is only in the struggle of intelligent organisms with the surrounding environment that theories acquire meaning, and only with a theory's success in this struggle that it becomes true. Pragmatists do not hold that anything that is practical or useful, or that anything that helps to survive merely in the short-term, should be regarded as true. Instead, most of them argue that what should be taken as true is that which contributes the most good over the longest course.

    Deconstruction is used to denote a philosophy of meaning that deals with the ways that meaning is constructed and understood by writers, texts, and readers. One way of understanding the term is that it involves discovering, recognizing, and understanding the underlying — and unspoken and implicit — assumptions, ideas, and frameworks that form the basis for thought and belief. It has various shades of meaning in different areas of study and discussion, and is, by its very nature, difficult to define without depending on "un-deconstructed" concepts. Deconstruction is neither an analysis, a critique, a method, an act, nor an operation, but an attempt to demonstrate that Western thought has not satisfied its quest for a "transcendental signifier" that will give meaning to all other signs.

    Feminist literary criticism is informed by feminist theory, or by the politics of feminism more broadly. In the most general and simple terms, feminist literary criticism before the 1970s -- the first and second waves of feminism -- was concerned with the politics of women's authorship and the representation of women's condition within literature. With the more complex conceptions of gender and subjectivity and third-wave feminism, feminist criticism has taken a variety of new routes. It has considered gender in the terms of existing relations of power, and as a concrete political investment. While it has been closely associated with the birth and growth of queer studies, the more traditionally central feminist concern with the representation and politics of women's lives remains.

    Formalism/New Criticism: While these two schools are separate and distinct, they can also be looked at together as both privledge the text itself over what goes into the making or reading of the text. They sometimes refers to inquiry into the form (rather than the content) of works of literature, such as plot, genre concerns (such as with a captivity narrative) but usually refers broadly to approaches to interpreting or evaluating literary works that focus on features of the text itself (especially properties of its language) rather than on the contexts of its creation (biographical, historical or intellectual) or the contexts of its reception. Adherents were/are emphatic in their advocacy of close reading and attention to texts themselves, and their rejection of criticism based on extra-textual sources, especially biography.

    Marxist criticism is a loose term describing literary criticism informed by the philosophy and/or the politics of Marxism. The simplest goals of Marxist literary criticism can include an assessment of the political "tendency" of a literary work, determining whether its social content or its literary form are "progressive"; however, this is by no means the only or the necessary goal. Marxist literary critics have also been concerned with applying lessons drawn from the realm of aesthetics to the realm of politics. Marxist criticism can be about identifying the class struggle within a text.

    New Historicism is an approach to literary criticism and theory based on the premise that a literary work should be considered a product of the time, place and circumstances of its composition rather than as an isolated creation of genius. It had its roots in a reaction to the "New Criticism" of formal analysis of works of literature that were seen by a new generation of professional readers as taking place in a vacuum. New Historicists aim simultaneously to understand the work through its historical context and to understand cultural and intellectual history through literature, which documented the new discipline of the history of ideas. Michel Foucault based his approach both on his theory of the limits of collective cultural knowledge and on his technique of examining a broad array of documents in order to understand the episteme of a particular time. New Historicism is claimed to be a more neutral approach to historical events, and is sensitive towards different cultures.

    Post-colonialism (also known as post-colonial theory) grapples with the legacy of colonial rule. As a literary theory or critical approach it deals with literature produced in countries that were once, or are now, colonies of other countries. It may also deal with literature written in or by citizens of colonizing countries that takes colonies or their peoples as its subject matter. Post-colonialism deals with many issues for societies that have undergone colonialism: the dilemmas of developing a national identity in the wake of colonial rule; the ways in which writers from colonized countries attempt to articulate and even celebrate their cultural identities and reclaim them from the colonizers; the ways knowledge of colonized people have served the interests of colonizers, and how knowledge of subordinate people is produced and used; and the ways in which the literature of the colonial powers is used to justify colonialism through the perpetuation of images of the colonized as inferior. The creation of binary oppositions structure the way we view others. Such opposition was used to justify a destiny to rule on behalf of the colonizer, or 'white man's burden'.

    Psychoanalytic literary criticism is criticism which, in method, concept, theory or form, is influenced by the tradition of psychoanalysis begun by Sigmund Freud. The object of psychoanalytic literary criticism, at its very simplest, can be the psychoanalysis of the author or of a particularly interesting character. In this directly therapeutic form, it is very similar to psychoanalysis itself, closely following the analytic interpretive process discussed in Freud's Interpretation of Dreams. The concepts of psychoanalysis can be deployed with reference to the narrative or poetic structure itself, without requiring access to the authorial psyche (an interpretation motivated by Lacan's remark that "the unconscious is structured like a language").

    Reader-response criticism is a literary theory that arose in response to the textual emphasis of New Criticism from the 1940s to the 1960s in the West. New Criticism had emphasized that only that which is within a text is part of the meaning of a text. No appeal to the authority or intention of the author, nor to the psychology of the reader, was allowed for the most orthodox New Critics. Reader-response criticism is a group of approaches to understanding literature that have in common an emphasis on the reader's role in the creation of the meaning of a literary work. Reader-response theory recognizes the reader as an active agent who imparts "real existence" to the work by reading it and completes its meaning "by applying codes and strategies". It is concerned with the reader's contribution to a text. It stands in total opposition to the text-oriented theories of formalism and the New Criticism, in which the reader's role interpreting literary works are not taken into account. In general, one can group reader-response theorists into three groups: those who focus upon the reader's experience and psychology, those who concentrate on the linguistic and rhetorical dynamic of audience, and those who concentrate on readers as cultural and historical ciphers.

    Structuralism is an approach to analysing narrative material by examining the underlying invariant structure. For example, a literary critic applying a structuralist literary theory might say that the authors of the West Side Story did not write anything "really" new, because their work has the same structure as Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. In both texts a girl and a boy fall in love (a "formula" with a symbolic operator between them would be "Boy +LOVE Girl") despite the fact that they belong to two groups that hate each other ("Boy's Group -LOVE Girl's Group") and conflict is resolved by their death. The versatility of structuralism is such that a literary critic could make the same claim about a story of two friendly families ("Boy's Family +LOVE Girl's Family") that arrange a marriage between their children despite the fact that the children hate each other ("Boy -LOVE Girl") and then the children commit suicide to escape the arranged marriage; the justification is that the second story's structure is an 'inversion' of the first story's structure: the relationship between the values of love and the two pairs of parties involved have been reversed. Structuralistic literary criticism argues that the "novelty value of a literary text" can lie only in new structure, rather than in the specifics of character development and voice in which that structure is expressed.

    Type any of the above terms into wikipedia.org and you'll see where I got my summaries, and then some.

    Summarizing

    Summarizing

    Summarizing what you read

    1. Find the Topic
      • Ask yourself, what is the article/essay/chapter about?
        • To answer that question, preview the text by reading the title, sub-titles, boldface headings and any other headings that may have been used.
        • If you don't have the topic after that, read the first and last paragraphs.
        • If you still don’t have the topic, read the first sentence of the remaining paragraphs.
    2. Locating and Stating the Main Idea
      • Ask yourself, what is the author’s main point on the topic?
        • To answer, preview by reading the title, sub-titles, boldface heading and any other headings. Look at any charts or graphs provided. Read the first sentence of each paragraph and the entire first and last paragraphs.
        • If you find a sentence that appears to state the main idea, underline and make a note in the margin.
        • Using your own words, write the main idea down in a complete sentence.
    3. Identifying the Major Details
      • Ask yourself, how does the author support the main idea?
        • Preview the article to find the topic and main idea.
        • Look for signal words and phrases that help identify major details. Signal words and phrases are, for example, first (or second, or third, etc.), for example, on the other hand, in contrast, finally.
        • Break longer works into sections. Read the first line of every paragraph to help determine where to break up the sections.
        • Determine the main idea of each section; the main idea of a section is usually a major detail within the larger text.
        • Label each section by writing the topic of that section in the margin.
    4. Composing the Summary
      • Opening sentence should contain text’s title, author’s name, and the main idea. (Don't worry about this one for journal entries.)
      • Provide major details of the text by changing the major detail phrases into complete sentences.
      • Provide minor details as needed/allowed to explain or clarify the major details (don’t include minor details in précis summary).
      • Must be written primarily in your own words. More than three words from the original requires use of quote marks. Do not string together a series of quotes.
    5. Responding
      • Record your first reactions to the ideas in the text and how they were expressed.
        • What did you learn that was new?
        • What was reinforced that you already knew?
        • How does any of this fit with your existing beliefs?

    Summary must be devoid of summarizer’s stated opinion, must maintain perspective and proportion of original, but must be in summarizer’s own words.

    Adapted from Read and Respond by Swinton and Agoposowicz

    Online Reading Materials

    Online Reading Materials

    Fiction Reading Materials

    Plot

    Plot

    Plot: Five Steps to Understanding Stories


    Plato described plot as the imitation of action or the
    arrangement of the incidents. The arrangement of the incidents or events must have a
    causal, inevitable relationship. in other words, there must be a readily identifiable
    cause-and-effect relationship in the chain of events.

    Aristotle broke plot down into three parts

    1. The beginning--that which does not itself follow anything by
      causal necessity, but after which something comes to be.
    2. The middle--that which follows something as some other thing
      follows it.
    3. The end--that which follows something, but has nothing following
      it.

    Others have broken plot down to five sections. If you ever watch
    Elizabethan drama, the five acts will follow the below progression. These five steps are
    one of the best ways to break down a stories components.

    1. Situation
    2. Complication
    3. Climax
    4. Denouement
    5. Resolution

    Plot: Loooking at the Parts of a Narrative


    Read the below short-short story and we'll then
    look at the elements of plot within it.

    Chapter VII

    While the bombardment was knocking the trench to pieces at
    Possalta, he lay very flat and sweated and prayed oh jesus christ get me out of here.
      Dear jesus please get me out.  Christ please please please christ.  If
    you'll only keep me from getting killed I'll do anything you say. I believe in you and
    I'll tell everyone in the world that you are the only one that matters.  Please
    please dear jesus. The shelling moved further up the line.  We went back to work on
    the trench and inthe morning the sun came up and the day was hot and muggy and cheeful and
    quiet. The next night back at Mestre he did not tell the girl he went upstairs wtih at the
    Villa Rosa about Jesus. And he never told anybody.

    --from Ernst Hemingway's In Our Time

    Looking at Plot: Situation


    This passage contains the story's Situation

    (relationships, compulsions, oppositions, conflict, instability):

    While the bombardment was knocking the trench to pieces at
    Possalta, he lay very flat and sweated and prayed oh jesus christ get me out of here.

    • The situation typically includes an introduction of characters and
      any background that will be necessary to understand the story's development.
      • While we don't get the character's name, we are introduced to him
        as a human being. 
      • With the shelling that is going on, we also get the background we
        need to understand the remainder of the story.

    h2 align="center">Looking at Plot: Complication


    The Complication (deepening of oppositions,
    heightening of conflicts, intensification of tension, the plot thickens)
    :

    Dear jesus please get me out.  Christ please please
    please christ.  If you'll only keep me from getting killed I'll do anything you say.
    I believe in you and I'll tell everyone in the world that you are the only one that
    matters.  Please please dear jesus.

    • With the complication, this is usually where you can begin to tell
      the good from the bad, the hero (protagonist: driver of the action) from the bad guy/gal
      (antagonist: the character in opposition to the protagonist) and who is allied with whom.
    • The complication here is that we can see the protagonist is
      praying, but the fact that the author uses lower case letters for traditionally
      capitalized words (jesus, christ, you) shows us that the man doing the praying does not
      below in the God to whom he prays. 

    Looking at Plot: Climax


    Climax (revelation, recognition, crisis):

    The shelling moved further up the line.

    • This is where decisions are made and actions are taken that make
      the outcome of the story unavoidable, assuming the plot is well constructed.
    • This choice as the climax is not absolute; the reason I've chosen
      it is because it is a turning point for the character.  The crisis is past and the
      remainder of the plot can play itself out.

    A Look at Plot: Denouement/Unraveling


    Denouement/Unraveling ( reappraisal,
    showdown,catastrophe, solution ):

    We went back to work on the trench and in the morning the sun
    came up and the day was hot and muggy and cheerful and quiet.

    • In this instance, we see a reappraisal, though it doesn't seem to have happened on a
      conscious level.  Despite the terror and promises of the previous night, things have
      returned to normal.  We can pretty much guess what is going to happen next.

    Looking at Plot: Resolution


    Resolution (stability with change) :

    The next night back at Mestre he did not tell the girl he
    went upstairs wtih at the Villa Rosa about Jesus. And he never told anybody.

    • The story is concluded, the conflict has played itself out and all
      the damage has been done and some sort of recovery may have begun.
    • Here we can see that the story is indeed done, the protagonist has
      gone back on his word, and things will go on as they did before this episode.

    Questions to ask about Plot


    Here are some questions to ask yourself as you work to
    understand plot.

    • What are the compulsions that drive the major characters?
    • What are the obstacles these characters face in achieving whatever
      goals they have articulated?
    • Is there a time crunch?
    • Does the protagonist make things happen? (Be definition, the
      answer should be "yes" so also ask yourself what are these things and why is the
      protagonist making them happen?)
    • Is the ending inevitable and surprising?
    • Is there a fatal flaw in any of the major or minor characters?
    • Is there a personality trait that decides the course of action?



    More Plot

    How Does the Author Manipulate Plot?

    When you read a narrative, it helps to be able to tell the
    difference between the story and the plot. The sequence
    of events which transpire, beginning with what happens first and continuing to what
    happens last, is called the story; the arrangement is chronological, and no special
    emphasis or importance is given to those events. Plot, on the other hand, is the
    manipulation of the events of the story by the author in order to create impact, to give
    special meaning to the story's themes, or to develop the characters. It is important to
    remember that the plot is wholly shaped by the author to his design. One can draw a
    diagram of a story or a plot to detect their structures and follow their movements. A
    story, based on the definition given above, looks like this:

    ----.----.------.----.------.----------.-->

         A     B       C
        D       E
                 F

    Events A-F appear on the line in the order they
    transpired, and the story heads in only one direction, forward. Plots have more shape when
    you try to diagram them. Here are three common plot structures:

    The Aristotelian plot generally orders
    its events (A-F) chronologically but begins with an initial conflict, usually some sort of
    problem, that the hero (protagonist) must solve. However, the hero finds obstacles or
    barriers (complications)--usually natural such as storms or wild animals, from opposing
    characters (villains or antagonists), or from weaknesses within the hero's own
    character--and as the hero attempts to overcome these obstacles, it creates a rise in
    tension in the action (what the characters do within the story) and in the readers. The
    story nears its conclusion in the climax when the obstacles are overcome and the initial
    conflict is resolved. Any loose ends in the story are solved in the denouement, and the
    narrative officially ends. A common form of story shaped by the Aristotelian plot is the
    quest. In the quest, the hero is forced on a perilous journey to attain some goal. Often,
    the hero learns about himself or herself and undergoes improvement as a person as the goal
    is approached, and just as often, the hero finds it is this self-improvement that holds
    the key to his or her success.

    In the Loop, the story begins in the
    present (also called the frame of the story) to establish the context of the narrative but
    then returns to the past, where most of the action takes place. Thus, the sequence of
    events (A-F) is drastically altered. Later in the story, the action returns to the
    present, with the intent that the information given about the past will help the reader
    understand what is happening in the spent. Scene E, where the juxtaposition of the two
    time periods takes place, thus becomes crucial to our understanding of the plot.

    In the X, the plot follows the fortunes
    of two major characters. At the beginning, one character (A) is somehow superior to the
    other (B), either physically, mentally, economically, spiritually, socially, etc. Often,
    this is expressed in the form of a power struggle, with character A having power over
    character B. But as the story progresses, Character A declines or worsens as a character,
    while character B improves; if there is a power relationship between the two, the reader
    can also detect a shift of power. Events A-F, though experienced by both characters, will
    have different effects, showing the downfall of the one and the rise of the other. The
    crucial event C depicts the moment when the characters trade places, and by the end of the
    story, the standing of the characters has been reversed, with character B having the
    power.

    Crucial to the author's manipulation of the plot is the
    idea of information. If the resolution of the plot depends upon the characters solving the
    conflicts they face, then it is imperative for the characters to learn how to overcome the
    complications in their path. To do this, they must learn something about those
    complications, or about themselves, and then be able to act upon what they have learned.
    Sometimes, the hero will learn the information he or she needs to resolve the conflict but
    may not be in a position to use it. One of the central sources of tension in the story
    "I Stand Here Ironing" arises from the fact that the mother, in her memories,
    knows exactly why Emily behaves the way she does, but she has been continually prevented
    from expressing any of this to Emily, and she finds it impossible to express it to her
    unnamed visitor, thus leaving the resolution of the story up in the air. Also, a minor
    character might learn something before the hero does because of that character's unique
    perspective, and further complications can arise if the character cannot get that
    information to the hero. In Othello, for example, Roderigo learns of Iago's
    treacherous nature when Iago stabs him in Act V, but his admissions of guilt, and
    especially of his part in Cassio's downfall in Act II, come too late to help Othello.

    How the information is revealed, and by whom, can be just
    as important. For instance, in the Star Wars trilogy, the fact that Luke Skywalker learns
    of his father's identity from Darth Vader rather than Ben Kenobi is much more dramatic,
    adding an element of shock and surprise. Characters will have "blind spots" when
    they are unaware of the information they need, and dramatic irony is created when the
    audience knows what the characters do not.

    Timing is also crucial. The author can withhold from the
    characters the information they need or reveal it as necessary to move the plot forward.
    Tragedy and comedy hinge on when the hero overcomes blind spots: if they are overcome in
    time, the story ends happily; if not, the story ends tragically.

    All of this manipulation will have an effect upon the
    audience as well. Our enjoyment of a story, and our understanding of what is happening,
    depends heavily upon what we learn about the characters and the problems they face. When
    we learn something new about the characters and their situations, we often feel the story
    has reached a "turning point," and, as a result, a higher level of tension.
    Thus, the author, by determining when to reveal certain pieces of information, can affect
    not only the plot, but an audience's response as well.

    The author uses several techniques to manipulate
    information and shape the story into a plot, and we as an audience can look out for them.
    Here is a partial list of techniques:

    1) The author chooses when to begin and end the story.

    2) The author chooses when to begin and end chapters (if any), often providing
    "hooks" to draw readers along and keep them interested.

    3) The author chooses the order he wishes to present the events of the story.

    4) The author makes transitions in time by employing flashbacks, jump cuts, or parallel
    scenes (scenes shown at different times but which happen concurrently). He slows time
    within a scene by using description and dialogue, which prolong the pace of the action. He
    speeds time with verbal summaries and quick cuts. The pace of drama, unlike fiction, is
    influenced more strongly by dialogue because the action on stage can move only as fast as
    the characters can speak.

    5) The author chooses a narrator. What the narrator knows, perceives and learns can affect
    how the plot is resolved (especially if the narrator is a character within the story) and
    how it is understood by the audience. This is where point of view and the reliability of
    the narrator can become important. Mystery novels often employ a narrator who knows
    nothing of the crime so that the solution can be delayed until the end.

    6) The author introduces or subtracts characters (or objects or forces) which assist or
    prevent the hero from resolving the conflict.

    7) The author may use subplots, secondary plots which are analogous to or counterpoints of
    the main plot. They will often involve the minor characters and broaden the audience's
    understanding of the main plot. Information can be given in subplots which is important in
    resolving the central conflict.

    Some of the effects these authorial choices have on an
    audience are:

    1) We feel a sense of opening or closure in the action.

    2)We sense a change in the direction of the story--a turning point--for better or worse.
    These changes are what create the rise in tension.

    3) We feel a heightening of our suspense toward the outcome based on our expectations for
    what that outcome will be.

    4) We are surprised when those expectations are not met, or met in a way we did not
    foresee.

    5) We learn something about the characters or the complications that we did not know
    before.

    6) We see the characters forced to make a decision concerning their course of action.

    7) We see the characters withstand reversals (peripety) or make a discovery or recognition
    concerning their fate (anagnorisis), often with the latter initiating the former.

    **One last thing to remember--a plot will have a story,
    but a story will not always have a plot. A plot holds a story within it the way a bottle
    holds water, not the other way around.



    Thanks to Todd Moffett and Tina Eliopulos of the Community College of Southern Nevada English Department for this information.

    Pentad


    Narrative Elements and the Pentad

    The more of each element a narrative essay contains, the more
    likely that narrative essay is to be effective in communicating
    the writer's point and effectively developing the essay's
    rhetorical goal.

    • Setting: place and time: where is it? Be sure your reader
      can see where the action is taking place.
    • Character--what are some characteristics of the primary
      characters that you want your reader to understand?
      Describe the character's behavior in order to get these
      points across.
    • What is the point of view: Omniscient, limited, or
      dramatic [shown]? Whatever your choice, be consistent.
    • Plot is established by a causal linking of events. One
      event must be shown to cause another. Key to revision for
      ideas.
    • The theme is the dominant idea expressed in the work. It
      should also be expressed in your thesis/controlling idea
      and developed in the body of your essay. Do your best to
      make it clear to your reader.

    The Pentad

    Perhaps the best Invention strategy for a narrative essay is
    The Pentad, which takes into account that every human action is
    influenced by five elements: act (what), scene (where, when),
    agent (who), agency (how), and purpose (why).

    • Act is anything that happens or could happen or is the
      result of a completed activity.
    • Scene is the setting or background of the action.
    • Agent is the person or force responsible for or
      influenced by the action.
    • Agency is the method that makes a thing happen.
    • Purpose is the reason or motive for the action.

    As noted in the invention reading, these elements are useful
    because they can be used to analyze events, arguments,
    characters, or audiences--anything involving human interaction.

    The Pentad Taken Further

    Answering these questions will give you considerable detail
    for a narrative essay. Develop the answers as fully as possible
    and you will go a long way toward completing your narrative
    essay.

    • What is the person doing?
    • How did he/she get involved?
    • What is the person trying to accomplish?
    • How will the person accomplish these goals?
    • What obstacles does the person face?
    • What action is the person trying to take?
    • What other actions are possible?
    • How does the setting, the time of the and others involved
      in it affect the person's actions?

    Character

    content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

    Character

    Character


    Plato described character as the

    "Moral constitution of human personality."

    Character can also be defined as the

    presence of creatures in art that seem to be human beings of one

    sort or another or persons sometimes sketched not as a

    individual, but as an example of some vice or virtue.

    Characterization

    1. The explicit presentation by the

      author of a character through direct exposition,

      illustrated by action often told either by first person

      narrator or omniscient narrator/author

    2. The presentation of character in

      action, with little or no explicit comment by the author;

      reader must deduce the attributes of the actor from the

      action

    3. The representation from within the

      character of the impact of actions and emotions on

      the character's inner-self, without comment on the

      character by the author: reader should come to clear

      understanding of the character's attributes.

    Types of Character Qualities

    Static: changes little

    or not at all: things happen to character, but nothing happens

    within. Pattern of action reveals/exposes character. If character

    is revealed bit by bit, character may seem changing, but can be

    static.

    Dynamic: modified by

    actions and experiences.

    Flat (one or two

    dimensional): constructed around a single idea/quality/

    distinguishing behavior; easy to recognize and remember but fails

    to recognize the complexities of the ordinary human mind.

    Disregards what does not fit the caricature.

    Round (three

    dimensional): all that a flat character is not: can it surprise

    in a convincing way? No surprises = flat, unconvincing in the

    surprises = flat

    Some Character Roles

    Protagonist: Often

    referred to as the "hero" but better thought of as the

    character that drives the action of the plot.

    Antagonist: Often

    referred to as the "bad guy" or the "villain"

    but better thought of as the character that stands in the way of

    the protagonist.

    These roles need not be filled

    exclusively by characters representing human beings. For

    instance, in Steven Crane's "The Open Boat" the

    antagonist could be considered to be nature, the stormy sea, or

    fate.

    More on Character

    Character in Fiction and Drama

    A character in a work of fiction or drama can be defined as a person, animal, place, or
    object that influences (or is influenced by) the plot and that demonstrates a unique
    personality.

    Thus, because the house in The Amityville Horror influences the plot and
    demonstrates a personality, it can be considered a character. Likewise, the cat(s) in
    Edgar Allan Poe's "The Black Cat" influence the plot and show personality, and
    so they can also be considered characters.

    Characters can be classified by the amount of influence they have over the plot. If a
    character has a large influence on the plot—that is, if the character's actions have
    a significant effect on the outcome of the story—then that character is considered a major
    (or main) character. On the other hand, if a character has a small influence on the
    plot—that is, if the character's actions have little effect on the outcome of the
    story—then that character is considered a minor character.

    Characters can also be classified by the amount of change they exhibit in their
    personalities. If a character undergoes a significant change in personality, then that
    character is considered a dynamic character. If a character shows little or no
    change in personality, then that character is considered a static character.

    Another method of classifying characters is by the fullness of their personalities. If
    a character has several well-defined traits and a complex personality, then that character
    is considered a round character. If a character has few (if any) defined traits and
    a shallow personality, then that character is considered a flat character.

    The most important character in a work, the character whom the story or play seems to
    follow, is called the hero or the protagonist (this character can also be
    called the title character if his/her name is used as the title of the story
    or play). The terms hero and protagonist are often used interchangeably, but
    in certain contexts, they are different. The word hero, derived from a Greek word
    meaning "protector," originally referred to a man born of one mortal and one
    immortal parent and known for courageous and noble exploits. We still look up to heroes as
    people with higher moral and physical standards than ourselves. However, some
    "heroes" engage in questionable or repulsive behavior; for example, the narrator
    in Edgar Allan Poe's "The Tell-Tale Heart," who kills his benefactor and buries
    him under the floorboards, can hardly be considered noble, so the term hero does
    not seem to fit him. The term protagonist is derived from Greek words meaning
    "chief actor" or "one who struggles first." However, though the
    protagonist is a leader, much like a hero, the term does not carry the connotations of
    moral worth as does the word hero. Thus the narrator of "The Tell-Tale
    Heart," who is the chief actor of the story, can rightfully be called a protagonist.
    In general, the term protagonist can be applied more universally than the term hero.

    The hero/protagonist can also be defined as the character who drives the action of the
    plot forward; he or she acts, and the other characters react. Again, the protagonist of
    "The Tell-Tale Heart" provides us with an example. His growing madness and his
    scheme to kill his benefactor are the actions that give the story its meaning; without his
    distaste for his benefactor's "Evil Eye," we essentially have no reason for the
    story to be told.

    Depending on the type of story in which he/she appears, the hero/protagonist may assume
    a number of secondary traits. The hero/protagonist of a tragedy, for example, often
    suffers a reversal of fortune and falls from a place of prominence in society. Sophocles's
    Oedipus, when he learns that he has killed his father and married his mother, abdicates
    his title as king of Thebes. In one moment, he is transformed from respected ruler to
    despised beggar. The tragic hero/protagonist may also undergo a worsening of character.
    Shakespeare's Othello changes from a capable general and loving husband into a capricious
    leader and jealous, homicidal revenge-seeker. The tragic hero/protagonist may also become
    gradually isolated from his/her society. Shakespeare's Macbeth, after murdering his king,
    alienating his friends and allies, and losing his wife, stands alone against his enemies
    at the end of the play. The hero/protagonist of a comedy, in contrast, often enjoys an
    improvement of fortune, a betterment of character, and a gradual inclusion into his/her
    society. In a traditional comedy, the hero/protagonist achieves all three at the end of
    the story through marriage, the age-old symbol of a happy union between two people.

    The secondary traits of the hero/protagonist may also be determined by how he/she
    resolves the conflicts facing him/her. The hero/protagonist may sometimes be classified as
    a Bull or a Fox. The Bull is a hero/protagonist who relies on strength to
    overcome difficulties. This character type has existed for ages. One prototype, Hercules,
    comes to us from Greek Mythology. Hercules is famous for his feats of strength, including
    the Twelve Labors. A prototype from the Bible is Sampson, who was terrifically strong but
    not very clever; Delilah easily tricked him into revealing the secret of his strength. A
    modern-day example of this heroic type would be Arnold Schwartzenegger, who has portrayed
    many strong characters in his movies, characters that derive much of their presence from
    his muscular physique.

    The Fox is a hero/protagonist who relies on cleverness or dexterity to overcome
    difficulties. This character type, too, has existed for ages. A famous example in Greek
    Mythology is Odysseus, who is renowned for creating the Trojan Horse and for escaping the
    Cyclops. In the Bible, Solomon, the ancient ruler of Israel, demonstrates his intelligence
    in the well-known story about the two women claiming to be the mother of the same child.
    In modern fiction, Sherlock Holmes, the world-famous sleuth, may also be categorized as a
    Fox because of his intelligence. An example from modern movies would be Michael J. Fox,
    who, as Marty McFly in the movie Back to the Future, escapes from Biff by creating
    and using a skateboard.

    In some stories, the hero/protagonist may be caught in a dilemma and forced to make a
    choice that will affect his/her destiny. In this situation, the hero/protagonist may be
    flanked by two characters who each represent one of the choices and who each try to
    influence the hero/protagonist to pick the choice they represent. These flanking
    characters are sometimes called the Good Angel and the Bad Angel.
    In some cartoons, a character, standing in thought, is suddenly visited by an angel on one
    shoulder and a devil on the other shoulder, each of whom whispers advice into the
    character's ears. A more serious character, Christopher Marlowe's Faust, is also visited
    by angels and devils. This image of the hero being flanked by a good and a bad spirit is
    derived from the medieval morality plays, in which the hero/protagonist often made moral
    decisions that would determine his fate in the afterlife. However, the Good Angel and the
    Bad Angel may simply be human characters. Shakespeare's Othello is flanked by his wife
    Desdemona, who represents truth, faithfulness, and "turn the other cheek"
    justice; and by Iago, who represents treachery, faithlessness, and "eye for an
    eye" justice. Oliver Stone uses the Good Angel-Bad Angel format in his movies Platoon
    and Wall Street to depict the choices faced by Charlie Sheen's characters. The Good
    Angel-Bad Angel characters, as seen above, can appear in many types of stories and dramas.

    The character who stands in opposition to the hero/protagonist is called the villain
    or the antagonist. As with the terms hero and protagonist, the terms villain
    and antagonist are often used interchangeably, but here, too, we should be aware
    that these words have different connotations. The word villain originally meant
    "feudal serf," one who worked on the country estate of a lord. Because serfs
    were of the lowest social class, the term gradually came to mean "vile, brutish
    peasant," and now the term describes any "depraved, base-minded" person.
    Thus, the word has had strongly negative overtones throughout its history. On the other
    hand, the word antagonist is derived from Greek words meaning "one who
    struggles against" and lacks the negative connotations of the word villain.

    Like the hero/protagonist, the villain/antagonist may assume secondary characteristics
    depending on the type of story in which he/she appears. The Bull and Fox categories
    described above may sometimes be used to classify the villain/antagonist. Examples of the
    Bull as villain are the original Terminator played by Arnold Schwartzenegger, and Biff in Back
    to the Future
    ; the supreme example of the Fox as villain is Iago in Shakespeare's Othello.

    Some characters may also be classified as stock characters or foil
    characters. Stock characters are recognizable stereotypes: the mad scientist, the femme
    fatale, the straight-shooting law officer, the psychopathic criminal genius. Each of these
    stereotypes has appeared in several stories and so has become familiar. Foil characters,
    according to Robert DiYanni, contrast and parallel the main character(s) in a play or
    story. Foils are usually minor characters but can sometimes be major characters, and they
    are closely associated with the character for whom they serve as a foil. The term foil
    derives from jewelry: the foil is the precious metal against which the precious stone is
    set; the purpose of the foil is to bring out the brilliance of the gem. Similarly, a foil
    character, through comparison and contrast, brings out the brilliance of a main character.
    In Shakespeare's Othello, for example, Emilia serves as a foil for Desdemona. In
    Act IV, Scene iii, when Desdemona wonders if any woman would cheat on her husband, Emilia
    asserts that she would if she gained the world as compensation. Her down-to-earth
    attitude, so in contrast to Desdemona's innocence and purity of thought, highlights the
    differences between the two women.

    In order to analyze a character's personality or motivations, the reader must search
    for a pattern in the character's behavior, and in order to discover this pattern, the
    reader needs to understand the techniques of characterization, which is the process
    by which an author creates a character. Authors rely on four methods to create characters:

    1) Through the exposition of the narrator (how the narrator views or judges the
    character). The narrator of a story or play may comment on how/he she feels, on what
    he/she thinks, on what he/she intends to do. This narrator may also voice an opinion about
    other characters, an opinion which helps the reader to understand those characters but
    also understand the narrator as well.

    2) Through dialogue (what a character says). As with people in real life, what
    characters say—and how they say it—reveals much about their personalities. A
    character's choice of words can reveal his/her feelings and intentions as well as provide
    insights into social status, education level, and area of residence. For instance, a
    character who says "I don't have any money" will likely have a background
    different than a character who says "I ain't got no money."

    3) Through action (what a character does). Again, as with people in real life, what
    characters do—and how they do it—reveals much about their personalities. A
    character who simply tightens his fist upon hearing that his father has died is likely to
    be a different sort of person than one who shouts, screams, and weeps upon hearing the
    same news. Also, a reader should make a special note of how closely a character's actions
    and dialogue agree. For example, a character who says "I'll be there by
    five-thirty" and then arrives at five-thirty can be considered reliable; a character
    who says "I'll be there by five-thirty" and then arrives at eleven can be
    considered unreliable.

    4) Through description (how a character looks/what belongings a character owns). We
    often gain our first impression of a person by noting what clothes he or she is wearing,
    what car he or she is driving, etc. For example, our impression of a man who wears a grey
    flannel suit and drives a Volvo will be different than our impression of a man who wears
    shiny black leather and rides a Harley-Davidson.

    Staying aware of these methods will help the reader determine if a character is major
    or minor, dynamic or static, round or flat. The reader should also use these methods to
    determine the reasons behind his/her attitudes towards the characters.



    Thanks to Todd Moffett and Tina Eliopulos of the Community College of Southern Nevada English Department for this information.

    Theme



    content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

    Theme

    Theme


    Theme is often seen as the general idea or insight the story,
    play, or poem reveals. There is no reason to think that a work of
    literature has just one theme. depending upon the perspective
    brought to the work, there could be a number of themes.

    Theme can also be viewed as an abstract concept made concrete
    through its representation in person, action, and image in a work
    of literature.

    The theme need not be obvious nor a moral or a message, though
    some moral inferences may be drawn from the work.

    Some typical themes are loss of innocence, initiation into
    maturity (known as "coming of age"), and man's
    inhumanity or frailty.

    Theme is not the plot.

    One way to determine a works theme, is to answer the following
    questions: How does the title relate to the story? What kind of
    change does the protagonist undergo? Any? Why? Are any
    observations on life offered up?

    Naturalism


    Naturalism and Determinism


    Naturalism is the application of the principles of scientific Determinism to fiction and drama. Naturalism is based on the assumption that everything that is real exists in nature and differs from Realism in that it portrays the representative and not the actual or common place, arranging materials to reveal a pattern of ideas. For a Naturalist, the 'actual' is not important in itself, but only for what it reveals about a larger reality. Both Naturalism and Realism require a high degree of fidelity to detail.


    Determinists believe that all acts that seem to arise from a person's will are actually the result of causes that determine them. Among these causes can be found the following frames of reference, depending on the epoch and attitudes: fate or necessity (neoclassic), will of God (Calvinist), action of scientific law (Naturalist), or operation of economic forces (Marxist). For the Determinist every act and action has a deeper meaning because these acts and actions are controlled from without and are not really the result of an individual's will or choice.

    Setting

    Defined: The total environment for the action of a fictional work.

    • The time period (such as the 1890's, early 21st century)
    • The place (such as downtown Warsaw)
    • The historical milieu (such as during the Civil War)
    • Social, political, and perhaps even spiritual realities.

    Established primarily through description, though narration is used also.

    Close attention to clothing, manners, vocabulary, tools, money, historical references and the like will help you to determine the time and the place of the story.

    Setting serves as a backdrop against which the action takes place, but it can also have an effect on the action of the story and on the behavior of the characters. The characters in Stephen Crane's short story "The Open Boat," for example, are somewhat at the mercy of their setting--they are stranded in the middle of the ocean--and are in a constant struggle against it.

    Setting helps to establish the personality of the characters. What belongings surround a character often determine what he/she is like as a person or how that person sees him-/herself.

    Setting can establish the customs and the culture of the characters. A character living in England will have a different way of celebrating Christmas than a person living in America; women and men in India act differently toward each other than do women and men in America; people dress differently, eat differently, worship differently, and speak differently based on where they live.

    Our physical environment is the exterior landscape, since it exists outside of our minds and surrounds our bodies. The exterior landscape can be a city, forest, house, room, street, ocean, or any other physical location.

    The interior landscape exists within our minds. The interior landscape is a picture of any thoughts, feelings, memories, etc., that we are aware of (that we can "see" in our conscious minds) at a given moment.

    Exterior can often be used as a symbol for the interior to give us further insights into the minds of the characters.. However, exterior landscapes can also be used to show contrasts between appearance and mental state, especially if a character is confused or indecisive.

    Setting can have thematic meanings. An ancient theme that arises out of setting is the conflict between City and Wilderness. In older times, when humankind's dominance over its environment was less certain than it is now, the city was viewed as a haven against the hostile forces of nature. It was also the center of culture and human endeavor. The wilderness, filled with dangerous animals, brutal weather, and other life-threatening forces (real and imagined), was seen as antagonistic towards humans and their civilizations.

    City

    --exterior, represents man's control over his environment and over nature, a refuge from the wilderness, and a center of civilization and law.

    --interior, it represents the rational, the conscious, the safe, the superego.

    Wilderness

    --exterior, the abode of lawless creatures and humans; it is the unknown in which dwell dangerous animals, monsters, etc., that constantly challenge humans and their civilizations. Generally perceived as hostile and unsafe to humans, and any desert, uncultivated land, or unexplored sea is likened to the pre-Creation, primordial chaos. However, it is also the setting for journeys, visionary experiences, and quests in which the hero must prove his/her valor. The Wilderness provides the visionary with prophetic insights and the hero with an opportunity to improve status, increase wealth, and gain renown. The Western view of the wilderness as a place to conquer is derived from the Bible, in which God commands mankind to establish dominion over the earth and over the animal kingdom.

    --interior, represents the subconscious or irrational, the id, the emotions (anger, fear, lust, greed, insecurity), repressed memories.

    Gothic genre upsets this traditional conflict by making the house, otherwise a symbol of safety against the wilderness, the abode of monsters and of the irrational.

    Pastoral works against this conflict by promoting the country as an idyllic escape from the corruptive influences of the city. Begun in ancient Rome to provide a diversion for world-weary citizens, the pastoral depicts shepherds as handsome, love-eager poets and shepherdesses as beautiful but coy objects of affection. The pastoral also calls into question the moral degeneration brought about by city life and institutions of power.

    Romantic movement of the 19th century, in some ways an outgrowth of the ancient pastoral, also counters this conflict by presenting nature as a beneficial place reflective of God's presence; the city, because of the debilitating effects of machines, industry, and city living, has become the symbol of fear and danger. The city, being a human construct, is seen as faulty and at odds with natural rhythms and processes. The "return to nature" becomes an escape from the harmful influences of mankind.

    Poetry Reading Materials

    Explicating Poems

    One Way to Explicate a Poem

    A good poem is like a puzzle: the most fascinating part is studying the individual pieces carefully and then putting them back together to see how beautifully the whole thing fits together. A poem can have a number of different "pieces" that you need to look at closely in order to complete the poetic "puzzle." This page explains one way to attempt an explication of a poem, by examining each "piece" of the poem separately. (An explication is simply an explanation of how all the elements in a poem work together to achieve the total meaning and effect.)

    Examine the Situation in the Poem

    • Does the poem tell a story? If yes, what is that story? Is it a narrative poem? Is so, what events occur?
    • Does the poem express an emotion or describe a mood? Is it a lyric?
    • Poetic Voice: Who is the speaker? Is the poet speaking to the reader directly or is the poem told through a fictional persona? To whom is the speaker speaking? Can you trust the speaker?
    • Tone: What is the speaker's attitude toward the subject of the poem? What sort of tone of voice seems to be appropriate for reading the poem out loud? What words, images, or ideas give you a clue to the tone?

    Examine the Structure of the Poem

    • Form; Look at the number of lines, their length, their arrangement on the page. How does the form relate to content? Is it a traditional form? (e.g., sonnet, limerick) or "free form"? Why do you think the poet chose that form for the poem?
    • Movement: How does the poem develop? Are the images and ideas developed chronologically, by cause and effect, by free association? Doe the poem circle back to where it started, or is the movement from one attitude to a different attitude ( e.g., from despair to hope)?
    • Syntax: How many sentences are in the poem? Are the sentences simple or complicated? Are the verbs in front of the nouns instead of in the usual "noun-verb" order? Why?
    • Punctuation: What kind of punctuation is used in the poem? Does the punctuation always coincide with the end of the poetic line? If so, this is called an end-stopped line. Is there any punctuation in the middle of a line? Why do you think the poet would want you to pause halfway through the line?
    • Title: What does the title mean? How does it relate to the poem itself?

    Examine the language of the Poem

    • Diction or word choice: Is the language colloquial, formal, simple, and/or unusual?
    • Do you know what all the words mean? If not, look them up.
    • What moods or attitudes are associated with words that stand out for you?
    • Allusions: Are there any allusions/references to something outside the poem, such as events or people from history, mythology, or religion? What might be the point of this?
    • Imagery: Look at the figurative language of the poem--metaphors, similes, analogies, and personification. how do these images add to the meaning of the poem or intensify the effect of the poem?

    Examine the Musical Devices in the Poem

    • Rhyme Scheme: Does the rhyme occur in a regular pattern? Irregularly? Is the effect formal, satisfying, musical, funny, disconcerting or something else?
    • Rhythm or Meter: In most languages, there is a pattern of stressed and unstressed syllables in a word or words in a sentence. In poetry, the variation of stressed and unstressed syllables and words has a rhythmic effect. What is the tonal effect of the rhythm?
    • Other sound effects: alliteration, assonance, consonance, repetition--what tonal effect do they have?
    • Has the Poem created a change in mood for you? A change in attitude? How have the technical elements helped the poet create this effect?

    Meter

    Meter


    Meter: the recurrence of rhythmic pattern.

    Four basic Patterns

    Quantitative: established through units containing regular successions of long and short syllables: classical meter. Syllables considered long if they have a long or short vowel followed by two consonants. Others considered short. two short syllables equal in duration to one long syllable. Somewhat like musical notes.

    Accentual: occurrence of syllable marked by stress or accent that determines the basic unit regardless of the number of unstressed syllables: old English versification and sprung meter.

    Syllabic: the number of syllables in a line is fixed, though the accent varies.

    Accentual-Syllabic: number of accents and syllables are fixed or nearly fixed: most common sort today.

    The Foot

    The rhythmic unit is known as the foot; A standard foot contains two syllables. See the stress patterns below, because there you will see a variety of feet.

    monometer--one foot

    dimeter--two feet

    trimeter--three feet

    tetrameter--four feet

    pentameter--five feet

    hexameter--six feet

    heptameter (fourteener if "iambic")--seven feet

    Stress Patterns

    Iambic--unstressed syllable followed by stressed syllable: "come live / with me / and be / my love."

    Trochaic--accented followed by unaccented syllable. often used in children's rhymes because of sing-song quality: "Jack and Jill / went up the hill /to fetch a pail of water; /Jack fell down / and broke his crown / and Jill came tumbling after."

    Anapestic--two unaccented followed by an accented syllable: "Like a child / from the womb / like a ghost / from the tomb"

    Dactyll--stressed/accented syllable follow by two unaccented: mannikin

    Spondaic--a foot of two accented syllables--usually monosyllabic words in succession. "Hot sun / cool fire" It's rare for a polysyllabic word to have two successive accents.

    Phyrric--a foot of two unaccented syllables. Some say since there is no accent, it cannot correctly be a foot "On the / bald street / breaks the / blank day"

    Rhyme Patterns

    Rhyme

    Rhyme: likely owes its existence to oral literatures, made it easier to remember lines/stories/myths/folklore/tales. classified according to position of rhymed syllables in the line and the number of syllables involved.

    True--can, ran; boat, tote--based on sounds of vowels and succeeding consonants of accented syllables.

    Sight--slant, near, off, imperfect--moved, loved

    End--at the end of the line

    Front--occurs at first syllable or syllables of the line (alliteration): Peter Piper Picked a Peck of Pickled Peppers.

    Internal--occurs somewhere between the first and last syllable of the line

    masculine--restricted to final accented syllable as in "can" and "ran."

    feminine--rhyming stressed syllables followed by rhyming unstressed syllable: "fountain" and "mountain"

    Reading a Sonnet

    One of the primary poetic forms in the Elizabethan/Shakespearean era is the sonnet. If you were around the court, if you were a man and worth your salt, you could turn out a good sonnet, no ifs, ands or buts about it.

    At first glance, or read, sonnets can be intimidating because of their rigid form, but here are some guidelines to reading them that should help you make sense of them at least on the surface level. After gaining that understanding, at least as much as is possible, can we then dig a little deeper.

    Rhetorical Form

    • The first four lines, or quatrain, introduce the subjct matter of the poem. This is somewhat like the situation in reading a piece of fiction.
    • The second four lines, or quatrain, introduce some complication to the situation. As with fiction, this can be pretty much equated to the complication of a story's plot.
    • The third set of four lines, or the third quatrain, take the complication further, intensifying the situation.
    • Between lines 12 and 13, there is what is called a "turn." This might be equated to the climax, with the denouement rolled in, in a piece of fiction because the resolution is about to come right away.
    • The concluding couplet provides some sort of resolution to the situation and complication. With shakespearean couplets, they are often rather witty or pithy, making the point quite clearly, maybe with a touch of humor, irony or something along those lines.

    Rhyme Scheme

    The typical rhyme scheme for the above describe rhetorical pattern for the Shakespearean or English Sonnet, is this: ABAB CDCD EFEF GG. One variation on this is the Spenserian Sonnet, named after Edmund Spenser, one of Shakespeare's contemporaries. It goes like this: ABAB BCBC CDCD EE. Another variation is the Italian or Petrachan Sonnet, named after the Italian poet Petrach who is credited with the creation of the form. This form is as follows: ABBA ABBA CDECDE or CDCDCD or CDEDCE. With the Italian Sonnet, the turn comes between the second and third stanza and more space is devoted to the resolution of the situation and complication.

    Meter

    A sonnet is always written in iambic pentameter. That means there are five iambic feet per line. We might think of that as 10 syllables per line to keep it simple. But the writing of a sonnet is anything but!

    This should give you some information to make sense of the sonnets you read.

    Renaissance Timeline and Background

    Elizabethan & Restoration Timeline and Characteristics


    • 1500 Beginning of the Renaissance period of Literature in England
    • 1533 Separation of English Church from Rome: This is where Henry VIII decided to drop the Catholic Church because the Pope wouldn't grant him a divorce so he could marry again.
    • 1588 Defeat of the Spanish Armada: Much of the fleet was sunk and scattered in a storm but the English saw this as a sign that God was on their side and that Elizabeth was in good standing with the Divine.
    • 1558--1603 Death of Elizabeth, Ascension of James I
    • 1580-1620 considered the Elizabethan period in English Lit. (Includes what is also called the Jacobean era)
    • 1605 Gunpowder Plot: Some Catholics, led by Guy Fawkes, attempt to blow up Parliament. Some killed resisting arrest remainder jailed and many executed for treason. Nov. 5 is Guy Fawkes Day in England. Fawkes is burned in effigy.
    • 1607 Settlement at James Town, Virginia: First real settlement of North America. Nealry 90 percent of the settlers are dead within the year.
    • 1609 First Scot and English protestant settled in Ulster: England sought to conquer Ireland by settling English Protestants. This is where the Irish "Troubles" began and are still going on today.
    • 1611 King James translation of the Bible: Primary translation used by Protestants still today.
    • 1616 Shakespeare dies
    • 1618 Harvey discovers circulation of the blood (published 1628): Prior to this it was thought that the blood ebbed and flowed like the tide.
    • 1625-49 Reign of Charles I
    • 1639 First printing press in America: In order to control the distribution of printed materials, it was illegal to have a printing press in the colonies. The suppresion of the means to distribute materials has been key to controlling many a society. Soviet Russia banned access to xerox machines in the 1960's and 70's and many repressive govenrments today ban access to the Internet to limit access to information.
    • 1642 English Civil War: Theaters closed because most drama mocks rulers; "New Model Army" is the first professional army. Earlier armies were raised from those working a particular noble's lands. The New Model Army recruited and paid soliders to fight for Parliament against the Monarchist forces.
    • 1649 Execution of Charles I: Many trace England's decline to this act. Since the Monarch was seen as God's chosen ruler on earth, to kill the king was to act directly against the will of God.
    • 1649-60 Interregnum-Rule of Cromwell & Son: Cromwell was an astute ruler but he made the mistake of passing rule to his incompetent son, rather an odd choice for someone who led the battle against the hereditary succession of power inherent in the throne.
    • 1660 Restoration of Throne to Charles II: After Cromwell's son botched things up, the people of England were eager to restore the Monarchy.

    Some Elizabethan Characteristics

    Nationalist fervor of country, bolstered by defeat of Spanish Armada (much of which was sunk in a storm), beginnings of world colonization and trade--both of which were reflected in literature.

    Renaissance learning and interest began to be more generally felt. English language enriched by borrowings from Latin, Greek, Italian, and French. Humanist ideals (exalt the human over the divine). Verse forms such as sonnet and blank verse became more familiar.

    Religious controversy: struggles between Catholics and Church of England, and also among those of the High Church (similar in many ways to the Catholic Church) and the Low Church (Puritans).

    Rhetoric is stylish and self conscious, showing relish for ornate and cleverly arranged words. Depended more on rhyme schemes than tropes (metaphorical figures of speech)

    Reliance on amplification, exaggerated emphasis in interest of persuasive effect

    Pathetic fallacies--attribution of living qualities to inanimate objects, primarily with animalistic hostility in inanimate objects.

    Some Restoration Characteristics

    Fashionable/popular literature of the era is a reaction against Puritanism. (Puritans wished to purify church of England by eliminating anything remotely smacking of the Catholic Church and its pomp--doing away with superstitious rites of church (such as transubstantiation where the wafer and wine are believed to actually become the real body and blood of Jesus Christ), taking communion sitting rather than kneeling, serious observance of the Sabbath, discarding apocryphal (spurious, doubtful, divinely uninspired) books of Bible.)

    Although a time of anxiety and tension, recrimination and score settling, literature marked by love of gaiety, wit, and immortality, revival of interest in science.

    Guiding Principles

    Nature's law: orders natural elements/physics

    Celestial/heavenly law: that which the angels follow

    Law of Reason: binds reasoning creatures to law which they know they are bound

    Divine Law: binds men, known only because of revelation by God

    Human Law: Laws that men make out by following reason or divine law

     

    The Chain of Being: describes God's plentitude, unfaltering order, and ultimate unity. Every speck in creation has a place in the chain.

    Earthly (bottom)

    inamimate class: elements: earth, water, air, fire.

    vegetative class: trees, bushes, weeds, etc.

    sensitive class--existance, life, and feeling that has three levels

    • Bottom--creatures with touch but not movment, hearing or memory. Includes shellfish (oysters generally considered the lowest), parasites.
    • middle is animals having touch, memory and movement, but not hearing. Ants are an example.
    • Top are higher animals, having all four characteristics (touch, memory, movement, and hearing): horses, dogs, cats, etc.
    • Man belongs to the existance, life, feeling, and understanding class.

    Divine

    Man's soul--bridge between earthly and divine

    Angels (Angles bridge the gap between god and man)

    Angels: triple divisions echo the Trinity

    (contemplative) Seraphs, cherubs, thrones,

    (Active in thought, not deed) Dominations, Virtues, Powers

    (Active) Principalities, Archangels, Angels

    God

     

    Ether: each ruled in order by the angels above

    primum mobile ,(outermost of 10 coencentric circles making up the universe--that which is the cause of all movement but does not move itself.) the fixed stars, Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, the Sun, Venus, Mercury, and the Moon.

    Among groups, there is one member who has Primacy:

    • God is prime among the angels
    • The sun is prime among the planets (earth wrongly seen as being at the center of the universe was considered the bottom)
    • The eagle is prime among the birds
    • The lion is prime among the beasts
    • The king is prime among men
    • Man's head is prime among his body
    • Justice is prime among the virtues
    • The rose is prime among flowers
    • The dolphin is prime among the fish

    Early England Timeline: 55 B.C.E. to 1616

    Britain early time line

    Celtic and Roman Britain

    428- 1100: Old English/Anglo-Saxon Period

    1000-1200: Transition from English to Norman French, Decline of Ango-Saxon heroic verse

    1100-1350: Anglo-Norman Period

    1350-1500: Middle English Period

    1500-1660: The Renaissance

    Additional Information: BBC History Timeline

    Elizabethan World View

    Introduction

    The most typical view of the Elizabethan ages seems to be that it is almost wholly a secular time but that is not at all the case. Instead, a “refinement” of a very medieval view of man’s relationship to God predominates and that’s what we’ll focus on.

    This view is expressed in three major ways: the chain of beings (vertical), the planes of correspondences (horizontal) and the Dances.

    The first major focus will be on the chain of being, but first some more general background:

    Man is viewed in something of a theo-centric context, in his relationship to theology, and the primary conflict/tension is between the present life and the expected after life of heaven, hell or purgatory (which I’m not entirely sure about beyond Catholic dogma at the time). Mankind was confounded between the conflicting claims of this and another world.

    Prior to the fall, in what some call the pre-lapserian state, man was unsullied. Since the fall man, while still inhabiting the place between the angels and the beasts, man was seen as having the capability to rise above his station, to be better in a theological or spiritual sense, which was a dominant medieval perspective.

    With regard to the Church in Shakespeare’s day, there was something of a high/low split. The high church was essentially the Catholic Church under the guise and leadership of the Church of England. These are the Anglicans. The low church was made up of various puritan sects. These groups were/are called puritans because they wanted to purify the church of it’s “papist” trappings, to make it more like the original church. They wanted a removal of finery, of sacraments such as marriage and confirmation which were not, in their minds, biblically based. They also sought a Presbyterian hierarchy, one in which each church chose its own minister from among the flock, in which the members of a congregation decided who was worthy of being a full member and receiving communion and several other things, such as the role of the Common Book of Prayer. Despite these differences, they were fundamentally the same in their view of the world and cosmology.

    This cosmology consisted of a ordered universe in a fixed system of hierarchies that were modified, you might say corrupted, by the fall of man and the hope of redemption. Within this Ptolemaic framework The limits of human virtue were set and immutable as each sort of human is aligned with a particular planet that governs their behaviors. In pagan systems, which came to influence Christian systems, one would pray to certain Gods only for certain things at certain times of the day. For instance, Mars, the god of war, was also the god of fire in crafts, such as smiths and cooks and miners. There was a particular time of day, according to the zodiac, when prayers would be appropriate. At other times, praying to Mars would be wrong and out of step.

    Something else to consider and keep in mind is that under the Ptolemaic system, earth is at the center of the universe, which is one of the reasons the “earthly” is seen as corrupt, because the lower on the chain of the universe, the less divine and more corrupt something was, but this is just one such fixed system. More later.

    As you might guess, this fixed system which I’ll describe in greater detail as we move on, came to be incredibly complicated and it ended up being simplified by the emergence of both Christianity and later on Protestantism. Still, as we’ll see in Shakespeare, there will be many comparisons/analogies of war is to the body politic as blood letting is to personal health, body parts to various constellations and more. The earthly is linked to the heavenly, the heavenly (meaning both the divine and those things in the sky) have a direct and profound influence on what happens on the earth among men.

    Although the Ptolemaic view dominated, many among the educated were aware of the emergence of the Copernican model, which is the universe and solar system pretty much as we understand it today, with the sun at the center of the solar system and the earth and other plants revolving around it. One of the problems this created was that in the fixed system, the sun was the “king” of the plants and the earth was the “dregs,” being at the center of things. Despite this emerging knowledge, many chose to stick with the old notions because of a general unwillingness to upset the system. It went without saying that the earth was at the center of the universe, just as for us many things go without saying, such as we must work to get on in the world, you will get ahead with an education, “the market” is a neutral force for good (if you are a believer in capitalism), and so on.

     The biblical justification for Ptolmeic System

    This is often read as the biblical pronouncement in support of the Ptolemaic system, but some consider this a mis-reading, that the world cannot be moved in the sense that its behaviors, rotation, orbit of the sun and such, are fixed, and themselves cannot be moved. I’ll let you decide on this sort of thing.  

     In the Ptolemaic view, it was right and proper to refer to Elizabeth as the “prime mover,” primum mobile, that which makes all else happen. She became viewed in this way in part due to the defeat of the Spanish Armada, which was partly due to superior weaponry (better smelting of cannons so they didn’t blow up in the sailor’s face) and partly luck as the Armada was dispersed by a storm. This victory was seen as God showing his favor to Elizabeth, but also to Protestants over Catholics for most Englanders, though Elizabeth did a good job of playing Protestants, both Puritan and Anglican, and Catholics, off against each other.

     Order

     When it comes to Elizabethan drama and poetry, order rules. The sonnet, which we’ll be looking at later, is considered the highest form of poetry and it is strictly ordered by a set of rules which we’ll discuss. Drama is the same, constricted most obviously by expected, maybe even culturally required, division into five acts: situation, complication, climax, denouement, resolution. To do otherwise  would be to mark ones self as being a fool.

    Order is defined/viewed thusly:

    Upsetting any order will upset the universe or one’s place in the cosmos, which is something we might take lightly, concerned Elizabethan’s mightily. Should disorder result in chaos, the laws of nature might no longer function—“the frame of the heavenly arch erected over our heads should loosen and dissolve” (Hooker) then the physical world would come crashing down, literally,  which would scare not just an Elizabethan with an education, maybe even an uneducated Elizabethan. Chaos was cosmic anarchy in the universe. The fear of chaos emphasized and underscores the desire for order, the need for order. In an orderly world, the subservient are rewarded by the sovereign for doing as told and the lawless are rebuked—in short, one gets what one deserves. The images are going to be more along the lines of what happens when the order is upset (think about Macbeth those of you who have seen the play, or Hamlet).

     Finally, here, there is mutability, change of our status in the world, such as from health to sickness, life to death, was often a primary concern. People knew they were mutable, that circumstances were mutable, even in the fixed system. This was due to the corruption/fall of man, due to our falling away from the divine.

    Sin

    This is no great variation in religious perspective from medieval times. Some say that men were bitter and thought so much of moral decay at the time because they expected so much in a material sense.

    Prime concerns: revolt of bad angels, creation, temptation, fall of man, incarnation, atonement, and regeneration through Jesus Christ. An Elizabethan could revolt against but not ignore these notions. It is generally thought it was easier to be an atheist than an agnostic then, given something of an all or nothing mindset.

    Disorder and chaos are the product of sin and man’s continually striving for dominance.

    The fall is seen as alienating man from himself. To regain true self knowledge man must contemplate the works of nature of which he is a part, which feeds scientific examination of the enlightenment, which goes back to the dominant view that the era is more secular than it was.

    The end of learning is to repair the ruins of our first parents. Learning is something man is capable of which sets him apart form the beasts. This brings about a double vision, of man as fallen and capable of redemption, something which before was viewed separately. This allows for sufficient optimism despite the degeneracy of the fall. Virtue remains though in varying degrees among each man and woman.

    The view is that man can rise above his earthly imperfection and reach toward heavenly perfection. Poetry is an example of man’s effort to rise above his fallen self and reach out towards perfection.

     Chain of Being: one of three forms of order for God’s provided abundance, unimaginable plentitude, unfaltering order, and ultimate unity.

     Shakespeare will often place man between the beast and the angel for emphasis, with destiny/the cosmic world having the lower world as it’s instrument; the heavens are alive and guiding our destinies. There is a sovereignty of nature.

    Links in the Chain:

    Divine Ranks

    God

    Angels

    Contemplative active in neither potential or deed: Serpahs, Cherubs and Thrones

    Active in potential, not deed: Dominations, Virtues, and Powers

    More active, some in deed: Principalities, Archangels, Angels

        1. The downside is the angels in hell: Beelzebub is the prince of devils, false god of gentiles
        2. Liars and equivocators
        3. Anger, inventers of mischief, Belial
        4. Malicious, revenging devils Asmodeus
        5. Cozeners, witches, etc.—Satan
        6. Aerial angels of plague, fire, and thunder—Meresin
        7. Destroyers, captains of furies, wars, etc. Abaddon
        8. Accusing, drivers to despair, calumniators,
        9. Tempters in several kinds Mammon

    Nature, which has no will, is sometimes inserted between man and the angels, along with the soul bridging the gap between man and angel, earthly and divine/celestial.

    Earthly Ranks

    Man belongs to the existence, life, feeling, and understanding class. Serves as a link between earthly and divine because man has the potential to be divine, but struggles with earthly corruption.

    Sensitive class--existence, life, and feeling that has three levels Vegetagive Class: trees, bushes, weeds, plant life in general

    Inanimate class:
    the elements of: earth, water, air, fire; aligned with humors: black bile ,blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and—the manner in which blood could be seen to separate when stored in a jar. See below.

    Humour Season   Element Organ Qualities Ancient name Modern Ancient characteristics
    Blood spring air liver warm & moist sanguine artisan courageous, hopeful, amorous
    Yellow bile summer fire gall bladder warm & dry choleric idealist easily angered, bad tempered
    Black bile autumn earth spleen cold & dry melancholic guardian despondent, sleepless, irritable
    Phlegm winter water brain, lungs cold & moist phlegmatic calm, unemotional Rational
    Among groups, there is one member who has Primacy:

    Glossary

    See below for definitions of important terms

    Allegory

    The literal meaning of "allegory" is a writing that conveys other than its literal meanings, where persons, objects, and actions within a narrative are equated to meanings that lie outside the narrative. One can also think of allegory as an extended metaphor. Edmund Spenser's The Faerie Queene is an example of an allegory. With The Faerie Queene, the action that is outside the narrative is the rule of Queen Elizabeth and the struggle of the "true" Church, that is the Church of England, over the perceived corruption of the Roman Catholic Church.

    • Characters usually personifications of abstract qualities.
    • Action and setting representative of relationship among abstractions.
    • Story may be religious, moral, political, personal or satiric.

    Readers must be careful not to rigidly equate characters to one dimensional notions. while Archimago in The Faerie Queene can be seen as the embodiment of corrupt doctrine, there may be more. To see Duessa as only the embodiment of duplicity and Mary, Queen of Scots, is to read too narrowly.

    Captivity Narrative

    Captivity Narratives in Puritan Culture; propaganda of narrative tales a staple in Puritan culture

    • Typically a single individual, usually female, who stands passively under the strokes of evil, awaiting rescue by the grace of God;
    • Represents whole chastened body of puritan society, dual paradigm of bondage of soul and flesh, self-exile from England/Israel, all that is puritan and analogous to ancient Israel;
    • Meet and reject temptation of Indian marriage and/or Indian’s cannibal Eucharist;
    • Redemption by grace of God and puritan magistrates linked to regeneration of soul in conversion;
    • Threats, dangers (tests of faith) result in ultimate salvation which is offered by proxy to other faithful in community.

    Determinism

    Determinism is the belief that all acts that seem to arise from a person's will are actually the result of causes that determine them. Among these causes can be found the following frames of reference, depending on the epoch and attitudes: fate or necessity (neoclassic), will of God (Calvinist), action of scientific law (Naturalist), or operation of economic forces (Marxist) or patriarchal forces (feminism). For the Determinist every act and action has a deeper meaning because these acts and actions are controlled from without and are not really the result of an individual's will or choice. Determinism is not an absolute for most in today’s world, because such a perspective denies the complexity of humanity. Even if the future is predetermined, human actions do influence what happens, but we're controlled by a larger force of some sort. One need not submit to fate.

    Didacticism

    Didactic means, in brief, "to teach." Didacticism is the instructiveness of a work, the purpose of which is to give guidance in moral, ethical and/or religious matters. Didactic works have as their ultimate effect or meaning outside the work itself and the realms of art proper. The lesson conveyed is more important than the work conveying the lesson. If didacticism is carried too far, it is in danger of subverting the object of art or literature to lesser and ignoble purposes. The early Puritan works are more didactic than literary so such "subverting" is not of great concern.

    Fatalism

    Fatalism argues that there is no free will, that we are predetermined by larger forces to do what we do, and history has progressed in the only manner possible. Even those actions that appear "free" work toward a predetermined end. As the Borg might say, for you Star Trek fans, resistance is futile (meaning acceptance is appropriate). All events are inevitable so you may as well accept them. Don't wear a seat belt, because it's either your time, or it isn't. A seatbelt won't change things.

    Feminism

    First Wave/Equality Feminism: It primarily focused on gaining the right of women's suffrage and other notions of equality. Focused on the sameness of god given rights, social and moral equality, acknowledge the existence of women's sexual desires, temperance, abolition of slavery (among Americans), abortion rights started in the early 19th century as a reaction to patriarchal social attitudes. Stuck in the cult of domesticity with women still confined primarily to the home.

    Second Wave/Difference Feminism: greater focus on economic equality, partly through female admission to previously male only/dominated arenas in business, education and politics; and rights of minority women. The onus was on overcoming or addressing the differences between men and women.

    Third Wave Feminism, resulting from an emphasis on the differences between men and women, the adherents of which probably would be considered “femi-nazis” by the likes of Rush Limbaugh. Third Wave Feminists are seen to have a more radical feminist agenda, such as those of lesbian separatists, who saw marriage and heterosexual relations as inherently bad for women (which makes the same-sex marriage push somewhat ironic). Third wave feminists emphasize differences’ between men and women and their needs, be they emotional, psychological, physical or something else.

    Post-feminism is something of a backlash against second and third wave feminist notions. The fundamental claim is that feminism is no longer valid.

    In literature, Feminism can be seen in "feminist critique," which is the evaluation of writing by men to look at their depiction of women and the establishment of a relationship with women readers. Gynocritcism, not a common terms, is the study of women writers and writing.

    Three phases of feminist "awareness":

    1. Feminine: Protested against male standards and values, and advocated women’s rights and values, including a demand for autonomy.
    2. Feminist: Focus on plight of slighted women, showing often harsh and cruel treatment of women at hands of more powerful males. “Women wrote in an effort to equal the intellectual achievements of the male culture, and internalized its assumptions about female nature” (Showalter 137). Rejection of prior "protest" standards with a focus on imitating male standards.
    3. Female: Women reject imitation prominent during the feminine stage/phase. Emphasize developing a female understanding of female experience. The female works to uncover misogyny in male produced texts. “Women reject both imitation and protest—two forms of dependency—and turn instead to female experience as the source of an autonomous art, extending the feminist analysis of culture to the forms and techniques of literature” (Showalter 139)

    Showalter, Elaine, ed. New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Women, Literature, and Theory. New York: Pantheon Books, 1985.

    Free Will & Determinism

    Augustine tells us that we are given Free Will in order that we might do right in the world, that we will follow what God intended us to do. He says that "If man is good, and cannot act rightly unless he wills to do so, then he must have free will, without which he cannot act rightly. We must not believe that God gave us free will so that we might sin, just because sin is committed through free will" (73).

    The big question is whether we are determined by previous events to do what we do, or whether we can act outside of these influences, whether we are free to do as we wish regardless of the circumstances. Determinists would argue that every event, including human cognition and behavior, decision and action, is causally determined by an unbroken chain of prior occurrences. Determinism is the belief that all seeming acts of the will are actually the result of causes that determine them.

    Free Will might be defined as the absence of fate and/or determinism.

    Saint Augustine. "On the Free Will of Choice." Medieval Philosophy. Forrest Baird and Walter Kaufman. Third Edition. 73-99.

    Humors

    Humors are based on Elizabethan notions of physiology, how our bodies are made and work. There are four: blood, choler, bile and black-bile, each of which is closely allied with the four elements that make up all of the universe: air, water, earth and fire. Healthy people had their humors in balance. The sick had an imbalance. Depending upon the symptoms one might exhibit, a certain excess or shortage of a particular humor might be noted and treated in kind. For instance, if one had too much optimism, if they were manic, they might have some blood let to bring them into balance. Humors were thought to be produced by the liver, based upon what one ate and drank, but they were also the result of a natural disposition--a little bit of nature and nurture--heredity and environment.

    • Blood and air are hot and moist, indicating a ruddy and optimistic humor.
    • Bile (yellow) is hot and dry, like fire. Bile indicates one is fiery complexioned and rageful, hot tempered.
    • Phlegm, like water, is cold and moist, indicating one is heavy, cold, and impassive.
    • Black-bile,, like earth, is cold and dry, indicating one is melancholic pale, thoughtful, and downcast.

    Imagism

    "Imagists" is a name given to a group of poets active in England and America between 1909 and 1918, but there are many similarities between the work of these Imagists and Emily Dickinson. Below is a list of characteristics that can be found in Dickinson's work, as well as the later Imagists.
    • Language of common speech is used, employing always the exact word, not the nearly exact;
    • Cliche is to be avoided;
    • New rhythms are created as the expression of a new mood;
    • There is absolute freedom in choice of subject;
    • Images are to be concrete, firm and definite in their pictures, even harsh in outline;
    • Concentration is to be striven for as the essence of poetry;
    • The poetry should suggest rather than offer complete statements.

    Irony

    Tragic Irony: use of terms and words that the character intends to mean one thing, but to the reader/viewer in the know, actually portend the hero’s demise. An example of tragic irony occurs in Oedipus. When confronted with the situation and resolution to the plague of Thebes, Oedipus declares that he will either kill or banish the cause of this plague, not knowing yet that he is the cause. The viewer doesn't yet know this (unless they already know the play which contemporary viewers of the play did) and the other characters do not yet know this either. Viewers learn of the irony later on in the play, when we learn of Oedipus's guilt and we think back to his earlier comments.

    Dramatic Irony occurs when the reader shares with the narrator/speaker knowledge of a situation or intention unknown to the other characters. An example of this would be "The Story of an Hour." We know that Mrs. Mallard is rejoicing in the freedom of her husband's death and she dies at the shock of losing that freedom upon his return. The others in the story believe she dies at being overjoyed upon his return. Readers know what all the living characters at the end don't, so we see things much differently. In Oedipus, probably the best examples include the words spoken by Teiresias in his first meeting with Oedipus. Teiresias says such things as “you yourself are the pollution of this country and “I say that you are the murderer whom you seek and “with both your eyes, you are blind: You can not see the wretchedness of your life.” For those readers who know what's going on, while others in the drama itself don't, that's dramatic irony.

    With verbal irony, the meaning intended by the speaker differs from the meaning understood by one or more of the characters. An example occurs in Oedipus when he says that “whoever killed King Laios might—who knows?—lay violent hands on me—and soon.“ This is an example of verbal irony because we know so much more than what the speaker intends, particularly in relation to the story’s plot and action.

    Magic Realism

    Magic Realism is a way of presenting the world that relies, on the surface, for the work to be conventionally realistic while containing contrasting elements that invade the realistic framework of the text. These contrasting elements often consist of the supernatural, myth, dream, and fantasy. Some draw no distinction between such works and pure fantasy writing, a genre in itself. This is often considered a dismissive perspective.

    Meter

    Meter: the recurrence of rhythmic pattern.

    Four basic Patterns

    Quantitative: established through units containing regular successions of long and short syllables: classical meter. Syllables considered long if they have a long or short vowel followed by two consonants. Others considered short. two short syllables equal in duration to one long syllable. Somewhat like musical notes.

    Accentual: occurrence of syllable marked by stress or accent that determines the basic unit regardless of the number of unstressed syllables: old English versification and sprung meter.

    Syllabic: the number of syllables in a line is fixed, though the accent varies.

    Accentual-Syllabic: number of accents and syllables are fixed or nearly fixed: most common sort today.

    The Foot

    The rhythmic unit is known as the foot; A standard foot contains two syllables. See the stress patterns below, because there you will see a variety of feet.

    monometer--one foot

    dimeter--two feet

    trimeter--three feet

    tetrameter--four feet

    pentameter--five feet

    hexameter--six feet

    heptameter (fourteener if "iambic")--seven feet

    Stress Patterns

    Iambic--unstressed syllable followed by stressed syllable: "come live / with me / and be / my love."

    Trochaic--accented followed by unaccented syllable. often used in children's rhymes because of sing-song quality: "Jack and Jill / went up the hill /to fetch a pail of water; /Jack fell down / and broke his crown / and Jill came tumbling after."

    Anapestic--two unaccented followed by an accented syllable: "Like a child / from the womb / like a ghost / from the tomb"

    Dactyll--stressed/accented syllable follow by two unaccented: mannikin

    Spondaic--a foot of two accented syllables--usually monosyllabic words in succession. "Hot sun / cool fire" It's rare for a polysyllabic word to have two successive accents.

    Phyrric--a foot of two unaccented syllables. Some say since there is no accent, it cannot correctly be a foot "On the / bald street / breaks the / blank day"

    Mimesis

    Mimesis is Greek for "imitation" and generally taken to indicate works of literature that imitate characters on a human level, where correspondence to the physical world is understood as a model for beauty, truth and what is good. In this respect, it is the representation of nature (not as in the woods and the trees, but the world around us). Mimesis is central to Coleridge's concept of the imagination, which where the unity of essence is revealed precisely through different materialities and media. Imitation reveals the sameness of processes in nature.

    Myth

    Myth (loosely) Defined

    • Myth is not a synonym for error or fabrication or falsehood; there is no concern when using this term for a myths truth or falsity.
    • Myths have been traditionally viewed as an often anonymous, non-literary and essentially religious formulation of a cosmic view.
    • Myths are often dramatic or narrative embodiments of a people’s perceptions of their deepest truths
    • Myths attempt to explain creation, divinity, and religion by probing the existence of life and death, by accounting for natural phenomena and by chronicling the adventures of cultural heroes.
    • Myths are generally stories that present supernatural episodes as a means of interpreting natural events
      • Myths make concrete and specific a perception of human beings or a cosmic view
      • Myths project social patterns upward to the superhuman level that sanctions and stabilizes a secular ideology
    • Myths differ from legends with their focus on the supernatural rather than the historical and from fables by being less concerned with moral didacticism (teaching) and by being the product of a racial group rather than an individual

    Structuralist qualities of the Hero

    • Mother is royal virgin
    • Father is king and often near relative of mother
    • Circumstances of conception are unusual
    • Reputed to be son of a god
    • Attempt is made at birth to kill hero, usually by father or maternal grandfather
    • But he is spirited away and raised by foster parents in a far-off country
    • We know little/nothing of his childhood
    • On reaching manhood he returns or goes to his future kingdom
    • After victory over some adversary he marries princess, queen, daughter of predecessor
    • Becomes king and reigns uneventfully for a time
    • Prescribes laws but loses favor with gods and/or subjects
    • Is driven from throne and city
    • Meets a mysterious death, often at top of a hill
    • Children, if any, do not succeed him
    • Body is not buried but there are one or more holy sepulchers

    Pastoral

    A poem of rural people and settings or a poem treating of shepherds and rustic life in a clearly unrealistic manner. Pastoral is after the Latin for Shepherd (pastor). These shepherds often speak in courtly language and when depicted visually look more like they belong at court than on some hillside tending sheep. The pastoral often is used to create a rural/urban dichotomy, with the rural being "good," a place of life and sustenance and the urban "bad," a place of decay and degeneracy. The rural is often portrayed as the simple and revered while the urban is complex and to be avoided. Rural life is idealized and urban life, by contrast, demonized. The pastoral can be found in just about any genre of literature, in whole or part.
    Sources: The Oxford Companion to English Literature and A Handbook to Literature.

    Post Colonialism

    Post-Colonialism deals with literature produced in countries that once were colonies of other countries, particularly the European colonial powers Britain, France, and Spain. It also deals with literature written in colonial countries and by their citizens that has colonized people as its subject matter, often addressing cultural identity in the colonized societies. Colonized people, especially of the British Empire, attended British universities; their access to education, still unavailable in the colonies, created a new criticism - mostly literary, and especially in novels. Following the breakup of the Soviet Union during the late 20th century, its former republics became the subject of this study as well. Any literature emanating from these countries and addressing subjects that concern the relationship between master and servant, colonizer and colonized, particularly in which the cultural and beliefs of the colonized are sublimated and denigrated as the culture and beliefs of the colonizer are advanced, can be looked at through the post-colonial lens, an inherently political form of literary criticism.

    More at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postcolonialism

    Predestination

    Calvin defines predestination as "the eternal decree of God, by which he determined with himself whatever he wished to happen with regard to every man. Not all are created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation; and, accordingly, as each has been created for one or other of these ends, we say that he has been predestined to life or to death."

    "Predestination." Wikipedia. 21 April 2008. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predestination

    Puritanism

    Puritanism: from The Puritan Tradition in America, 1620-1730

    Puritanism: springs from the idea that someone, somewhere, might be enjoying themselves. (this is a joke)

    Suggestion: Keep these ideas in mind while reading the Puritan writers and preparing to write an essay on some issue taken from early American literature’s colonial period.

    Progression of Puritan evolution

    1. 1517: Luther tacks up his 95 thesis to initiate Protestant Reformation (or Revolt from the Catholic perspective)
    2. Henry VIII split with Rome in 1534; daughter Elizabeth’s worldly ambitions took precedence over churchly ambitions. She curbed religious extremism in favor of social stability (2)
    3. Acts of Supremacy and Uniformity. Must attend CofE services; Henry declaring that he was 'the only supreme head in earth of the Church in England' and that the English crown shall enjoy "all honours, dignities, preeminences, jurisdictions, privileges, authorities, immunities, profits, and commodities to the said dignity".
    4. 1563: 39 Articles of Faith fixed forms of worship; still too Popish/Catholic for some
    5. 1572: Sought Non-conformity bill for Puritans. Parliament provided some support for Puritan goals.
    6. Specific complaints emerging from CofE’s administration:
      • Bishops create too many new clergy of men unqualified to positions not needed (4-5)
      • Book of Common Prayer contrary to God’s word (the Bible)
      • Various popes have corrupted the sacraments (of which there really are only two: baptism and communion/feast of last supper) with increased pomp and finery
    7. Mary reestalished relationship with Rome after Edward's death, which Elizabeth again severed.
    8. Elizabeth rejected these admonitions, jailing Puritan critics despite their widespread public support (4, 10), Parliament did not enact meaningful ecclesiastical reform, resulting in anti-Puritan backlash at official levels: jailings, lost jobs, etc.
    9. James I (former James IV of Scotland) sided with Church as a way to extend his powers (11). He feared giving too much sway to the common man and told Puritans “conform or be harried out of the land” However, he did lend more than a sympathetic ear to Puritan concerns, hoping to put them to rest, resulting in Hampton Court Conference
    10. Puritans wanted it understood that the elect can fall from grace; they wanted greater say in the procedure and paraphernalia of worship, along with church organization and fundamental theology (14)
    11. With ascension of Charles I, and promotion of William Laud to Archbishop of Canterbury (ministerial head of CofE), Puritans were pressed to conform or lose positions. Some did, some played game of cat-and-mouse, others, such as Thomas Shepherd, fled (35).
    12. Brownists (followers of Robert Browne) and other “separatists” settled in NE before the Puritan exodus. These folks generally more radical dissenters than the Puritans who had hopes of reforming the CofE from within; however, theologically the groups were pretty much cut from the same cloth (40).
    13. Some, such as Pilgrims, came to NE via Holland, which wasn’t the greatest place to be. Bad weather, possible trouble with Catholic Spain, aging population, invasive culture and other concerns bedeviled the Puritan émigrés.  The Pilgrims finally decided it was time to move to NE or let the movement die. Also motivated by desire to spread the gospel (43). Emigrate in 1620.
    14. Mayflower compact a result of a broken commercial contract. Secular participants, landing in NE instead of Virginia, felt no obligation to support the Puritans who were the motivating force behind the particular journey. Settlement was also illegal lacking the proper charter from the crown for where they were.
    15. Most Pilgrims dead within the year. Only 20 able bodied men left of 50 people total

    Puritan(ism) defined/described: (largely Calvinist in theology)

    • God has supreme authority over Church and human affairs as expressed in the Bible
    • The private study of the Bible is emphasized
    • A desire to see education and enlightenment for the masses (especially so they could read the Bible for themselves)
    • The priesthood is of all believers: likening the whole body of believers to the priesthood of ancient Israel removes the possibility of a spiritual aristocracy or hierarchy within Christianity. God is equally accessible to all the faithful; no Christians have been set above others in matters of faith or worship.
    • The Pope was an Antichrist (someone/thing that looks good but is inherently evil/opposed to God.
    • Called for simplicity in worship, the exclusion of vestments, images, candles, etc.
    • Some approved of the church hierarchy, but others sought to reform the Episcopal (a single hierarchy terminating at the top with a overall leader, such as the Pope) churches on the Presbyterian model (A bishop is the highest office of the church (there is no Patriarch or Pope over bishops),
      • Bishop and elder (or presbyter) are synonymous terms. Bishop describes the function of the elder (literally, overseer), rather than the maturity of the officer.
        • The function of preaching and the administration of the sacraments is ordinarily entrusted to specially trained elders (known as ministers) in each local congregation, approved for these tasks by a governing assembly (presbytery, or classis), and called by the local congregation.
        • Pastoral care, discipline, leadership and legislation are committed to the care of ruling assemblies of presbyters among whom the ministers and other elders are equal participants.
      • All Christian people together are the priesthood, on behalf of whom the elders are called to serve by the consent of the congregation)
    • Some separatist Puritans were Presbyterian, but most were Congregationalists (embodying the theory that (1) every local church is a full realization in miniature of the entire Church of Jesus Christ; and (2) The Church, while on earth, besides the local church, can only be invisible and ideal.)
    • Most prominent Puritans commit life to God publicly, providing a laundry list of their depravity and the manner in which they have struggled and failed to overcome that depravity. 
    • Often attribute natural events, such as a sickness or death, as either a test from God or an act of Satan hoping to derail them in their quest for salvation (21-22). One such leader, John Winthrop, saw NE as a staging ground for heaven, hence the “citty on the hill” appellation (26).

    Calvinism: man is a complete ruin in need of God’s salvation; drastic intervention on God’s part needed to overtake man’s sinful nature

    • Total depravity (or total inability): As a consequence of the Fall of man, every person born into the world is enslaved to the service of sin. People are not by nature inclined to love God with their whole heart, mind, or strength, but rather are inclined to serve their own interests over those of their neighbor and to reject the rule of God. Thus, all people by their own faculties are unable to choose to follow God and be saved.
    • Unconditional election: God's choice of those whom he will bring to himself is not based on foreseen virtue, merit, or faith in those people. Rather, it is unconditionally grounded in God's mercy.
    • Limited atonement: The death of Christ actually takes away the penalty of sins of those on whom God has chosen to have mercy. It is "limited" to taking away the sins of the elect, not of all humanity, and it is "definite" and "particular" because atonement is certain for those particular persons. [past sins are specifically remitted; future sins are potentially remitted/remitted in the person (17). ]
    • Irresistible grace (or efficacious grace): The saving grace of God is effectually applied to those whom he has determined to save (the elect) and, in God's timing, overcomes their resistance to obeying the call of the gospel, bringing them to a saving faith in Christ. [Predestination accompanied by the greatest wisdom, freedom, firmness and immutability Church membership, and in New England, resulting Civil membership, limited to those chosen by God.]
    • Perseverance of the saints: Any person who has once been truly saved from damnation must necessarily persevere and cannot later be condemned. The word saints is used in the sense in which it is used in the Bible to refer to all who are set apart by God. [Sanctification, glorification resulting in eternal happiness, has a beginning, middle, and presumably an end, but not clearly detailed process is provided (19-20). Preachers were noted for their depth of piety, which opened them to scorn, ridicule and criticism when they fell short (20).]

    Some Observations on Puritanism

    • For most part, NE puritans no different than OE puritans; they are set apart by their decision to emigrate instead of stay put and clamber for change (xii)
    • Upon their move to America, Puritans changed from a loosely bonded factional movement to a hegemonic faith and administration—sought to assert their views on others (xii)
    • American Puritanism focuses on Congregationalism and the Plymouth separatists were more quasi than wholly separatist (xiii)
    • Conversion and rebirth required adherents to reform their whole lives (xiii)
    • Puritans took lead in best—education—and worst—witchcraft persecution—in the colonies (xiv)
    • Non puritans saw this early experiment in religious reform as either misguided or appalling (xvi), particularly the mixing of church and state roles (xvi)
    • When the puritan movement got out of hand, the backlash resulted in the death of Cromwell’s son, the restoration of Charles II to the throne, end of Congregationalists NE monopoly, franchise being given to non-puritans, by end of 1600’s. Still, most writing on Puritans is laudatory (xvi)
    • Knowledge comes from sermons that have survived, often drafted for special occasions; other documents that have survived, notably less than flattering portrayals of puritans, have colored out notions of them as scofflaws and malcontents and killjoys (xxvi)
    • Puritans settled in West Indies and South as well as NE (xxxii)
    • Rationales for going were often written up with pro/con lists. The pros listed a reason, such as being able to make “better” use of the land than the present inhabitants. The cons would be brief, but thoroughly refuted. IE: the natives were there first, which is not a good thing since we’ll be stealing their land, but since we’ll put it to more productive use, that’s okay. What were viewed as “civil” rights were seen to trump “natural” rights (28-35). Thomas Shepherd was one such person.

    Orderly Society

    • With Congregationalists, what is good for the individual is good for society at large (129). “Disorder is the effect of sin” (129)
    • Anglicans sought order in tradition, the church as it more or less always had been. Puritans sought order from and in the Bible. This was God’s intentions versus man’s inventions; society must be remade in a biblical image (129).
    • Society must monitor its members so God doesn’t punish them all for the failings of one or some (130).
    • We were placed by God in our station and to seek to alter that placement was seen as a rebellion against the work of God. God is the author of every lawful calling; all other callings the work of Satan or rebellion. Man’s place in society was seen as analogous to the function of each body part having its place in our life’s functions. Whatever we do must serve the general good and must be done diligently (132).
    • Sloth and negligence violate the social order (134).
    • General calling of all is to be a good Christian, measured by what we do to serve the common good. More particular callings are based on distinctions God made between man and man (each of us) shown by our inward gifts and station of birth (135). This sometimes fostered a dependence on the clergy for their superior knowledge of the Bible and while also leading to excessive introspection (we’ll see this in The Scarlet Letter).
    • There are rich and poor, weak and strong by God’s design. The rich and great need someone to watch over and practice charity on, someone to love, to show mercy to, etc.; the poor are to practice faith, patience, obedience and the like, to their “superiors.” In this respect, each needs the other (139). Justice and mercy requires helping those in distress and all should act out of some sense of the golden rule (140).
    • Pilgrims bound by Christian love with good of the whole placed above the good of the individual. All must be done to serve God and to promote the common good. Others must be put before the selfish-self. God must be obeyed, sin will be punished and God is sanctified by our actions (145).

    The above material that lacks a citation was taken and somewhat revised from Wikipedia

    Rhyme

    Rhyme

    Rhyme likely owes its existence to oral literatures, made it easier to remember lines/stories/myths/folklore/tales. Classified according to position of rhymed syllables in the line and the number of syllables involved.

    True--can, ran; boat, tote--based on sounds of vowels and succeeding consonants of accented syllables.

    Sight--slant, near, off

    imperfect--moved, loved

    End--at the end of the line

    Front--occurs at first syllable or syllables of the line (alliteration): Peter Piper Picked a Peck of Pickled Peppers.

    Internal--occurs somewhere between the first and last syllable of the line

    masculine--restricted to final accented syllable as in "can" and "ran."

    feminine--rhyming stressed syllables followed by rhyming unstressed syllable: "fountain" and "mountain"

    Satire

    Satire is a work or approach that blends a censorious attitude with humor and wit for improving human institutions or humanity. Satirists don’t so much attempt to tear down what they attack but instead seek to inspire the target of their wit to reform themselves. The focus is generally on vice and folly. If a writer simply is abusive, they are engaging in invective. If they are making personal attacks, they are being sarcastic. As a rule, satire spares the individual to do as Joseph Addison, one of the noted 18th century English satirists directs, “to pass over a single foe to charge whole armies.” Satire generally deals less with the great sinners and criminals of the world and more often with the run of the mill fool, knave, ninny, oaf, fraud and codger. Satire is of two types: direct, usually written in the first person spoken directly to the reader or a character in the satire, or indirect, where the satire is expressed through a narrative and the characters who are the butt of the ridicule are ridiculed by what they themselves say and do. Indirect satire is the more common of the two.

    Sentimentalism and Sentimental Novel

    Sentimentalism is a reaction against the rather immoral restoration works that in themselves were a reactions against Puritanical works of the mid-seventeenth century. In general terms, sentimentalism is divided into two groups:

    1. An overindulgence in emotion, especially the conscious effort to induce emotion in order to enjoy it, and;
    2. An optimistic overemphasis of the goodness of humanity, representing, in part, a reaction against Calvinism which regarded human nature as depraved.

    The sentimental novel has also been called the novel of sensibility. This novel seeks to inculcate virtuous behavior on the part of the reader by giving them a model to imitate. The audience for such works tended to be young women (because educated, mature women, and men in general, shouldn't be wasting their time reading or writing fiction). The characters will have a heightened emotional response to events, with the aim of producing a similar response in the reader.The protagonist will generally be a young woman who encounters the world in a way that challenges and refines her naive but naturally good views.

    This also contains elements of what has been termed a novel of manners, in which the novel is dominated by social custom, conventions and habits of a definite social class, one that should be aspired to. Quite often there will also be a religious component to the work depending upon when and where it was written.

    Slave Narrative

    Slave narratives were generally written between 1830 and 1860. They are autobiographical accounts of a slave's life, and generally their escape, which are/were part of the abolitionist movement.

    Jacobs’ work received little attention before 1981 due to disputes about authorship that were laid to rest by a study of her letters. The authenticity of her writings and the events were established in 1987.

    Characteristics of Female Slave Narrative (and male as well)

    • Female slave narrative asks whether sexual oppression is worth than “merely” physical oppression and abuse. Women, unlike men, cannot respond via physical dominance, a staple of the male slave narrative.
    • Female slaves engage in a war of words/wits rather than strength
      • Lewd notes used to oppress Jacobs; harassment through letters; literacy taken for granted
      • Male overpowering of master/oppressor generally a turning point in their journey to freedom
      • Examines community and personal relations in contrast to the solitary male experience; communal effort at escape and salvation

    • Mother’s relation to children holds her to the spot, compels escape
    • Female slave narrative does not emphasize empowerment of becoming literate as does male slave narrative; literacy is of primacy in attaining freedom and identify in male slave narrative.
    • Does not end with hero/protagonist reaching north, but shows how long arm of slavery reaches further, thanks to Fugitive Slave Law of 1850
    • Genre concerns: Generally a sentimental novel of seduction and domestic novels with regard to female slave seeking to retain her virtue
      • Introduces twist of sexual harassment
      • Story does not end with marriage as would a sentimental/domestic novel
      • Confronts sexual advances of a man/men of questionable morals, superior power, position and means
      • Illicit sex versus well being (got in way of Jacob’s book being read as a slave narrative rather than standard domestic/seduction novel)
      • Sentimental techniques deemed inappropriate and inadequate for a slave narrative

    • Emphasizes disparity between writer and reader
    • Undermines female purity by taking own lover

    More on the slave narrative from Donna Campbell at Washington State University.

    Sonnets

    See the attached Powerpoint.

    AttachmentSize
    sonnets.pptx55.27 KB

    Sublime

    The Sublime is said to be characterized by nobility and grandeur that is impressive, exalted and raised above ordinary human qualities. It is said a painful idea creates the sublime passion and concentrates the mind on a facet of experience and produces a momentary suspension of rational activity, uncertainty and self-consciousness. Below are degrees of the sublime:

    • Beauty—light reflected off a flower
    • Weak sublime—light reflected off rocks in a river
    • Sublime—turbulent nature, pleasure derived from objects that cannot sustain the life of the observer
    • Full feeling sublime—overpowering turbulent nature; pleasure from violent, destructive objects
    • Fullest feeling sublime—understanding immensity of universes extent and duration; pleasure of observer’s nothingness and oneness with nature.

    Symbol

    Something that on the surface is its literal self but which also has another meaning or even several meanings. For example, a sword may be a sword and also symbolize justice. A symbol may be said to embody an idea. There are two general types of symbols: universal symbols that embody universally recognizable meanings wherever used, such as light to symbolize knowledge, a skull to symbolize death, etc., and constructed symbols that are given symbolic meaning by the way an author uses them in a literary work, as the white whale becomes a symbol of evil in Moby Dick.

    Theme

    An abstract concept made real/concrete through representation in person, action, and/or image. A theme is not just a subject/thing or verb/action/activity. For instance, adultery is a "thing" and of itself it cannot be a theme. However, the notion that "while adultery is generally viewed as being sinful, good can come of it" could be a theme. Similarly, "truth" is a thing, an abstract concept. It can be a theme when we suggest that "searching out the truth is not always a noble act." You can think of theme much as if it is a claim to be demonstrated or articulated through a piece of literature as it unfolds.

    Tragedy

    Tragedy is generally a play that recounts an important and causally (as in cause and effect) related series of events in the life of a person of significance, such events culminating in the unhappy catastrophe (fall from high estate to low estate, fall from grace to despair) as the result of some tragic flaw/trait, the whole treated with great dignity and seriousness. Tragedy should arouse pity and fear (for whom is open to dispute), the end of the play resulting in the release of these emotions (known as catharsis).

    • Pity and fear should be the response to plotted actions, spectacle okay but not as good.
    • Must be a person of high character and demise must be faced with nobility of spirit and courage.
    • Demise must result from noble pursuit.
    • Tragedy treats human beings in terms of their godlike potential.
    • Tragic flaw/trait is an integral part of hero’s character. The same thing that leads to the character’s rise leads to his demise.

    Transcendentalism

    Transcendentalism is not as much concerned with a metaphysics that transcends daily lives than it is with a new view of the mind that replaces Locke's (blank slate) empiricist, materialistic, and passive model with one emphasizing the role of the mind itself in actively shaping experience.

    • Counters Locke's claim that there is nothing in the mind not first put there through the senses; the Transcendentalists answer with nothing except the mind itself.
    • The Unitarians used Locke both negatively, to undermine the orthodox Calvinist belief in original sin-if the mind is a blank slate at birth it cannot be innately depraved-and positively, to underwrite belief in the special dispensation of Christianity through the evidence of Jesus' miracles, sensory testimony of his spiritual power, the flesh testifying to the word.
    • While Kant emphasized the power of the mind he also stressed its limits, its inability to know reality absolutely.
    • The Transcendentalist vision went beyond Kant in insisting that the mind can:
      • apprehend absolute spiritual truths directly without having to go through the detour of the senses,
      • without the dictates of past authorities and institutions, and
      • without the plodding labor of ratiocination. (reasoning methodically)
      • In this sense particularly, it was the logical--or supralogical--extension of both the Protestant reformation and American democratic individualism.
      • major paradigm shift in epistemology, in conceptualizing how the mind knows the world, the divine, and itself.
      • Belief in an ideal spiritual state that transcends the physical and empirical and is realized only through intuition rather than doctrine of established church/religion.
      • Natural evolution of revelation coming first mediated from the pulpit, next unmediated from scripture, now from nature and the self, wholly unmediated.
      • Gospel of spiritual self-sufficiency and exalted god-like nature of human spirit
      • Man a god walking in the flesh, the deity within the self
      • Each person priest, church and Bible.
      • Response to nationalism and the shift from agrarian to industrial society as well as excesses of Congregationalism
      • reply to the skeptical philosophy of Locke by Kant and Swedenborg among others.

      Other transcendental qualities

      • Reliance on intuition and conscience; a way of knowing
      • Within nature of humans there was something that transcended human experience, an intuitive and personal revelation
      • Every person’s relation to God was established directly by the individual rather than through ritualistic church
      • Human beings divine in their own right
      • Self trust and self reliance to be practiced at all times because to trust the self was to trust a creation of God and his voice through that creation
      • Belief in democracy and individualism
      • Women’s suffrage

      Utilitarianism

      Utilitarianism is the philosophy that argues that moral worth is found in the consequences of actions (act utilitarianism) or, for others, the following of the proper rules (rule utilitarianism). John Stuart Mill defines utilitarianism as being those "actions [that are] right as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." In this respect, happiness is the same as pleasure or the absence of pain. However, this is not a selfish or hedonistic happiness. The pleasures we are to seek, the pleasures that are most "right" in a utilitarian sense, are those that reside in our highest faculties, those that maximize the overall good for the greatest number. These pleasures are to be about each man developing his powers to their complete whole. Happiness, in the utilitarian sense, is described as a first principle, one for which there is no proof. Since it cannot be objectively proved that happiness is a first principle, we must, as a society, agree upon this instead.

      Shakespeare Reading and Writing Schedule

      11winterShakespeare

      Winter 2012 Introduction to Shakespeare

      Preliminary Reading and Writing Calendar

      Jan 2
      Jan 3
      Jan 4
      Jan 5
      Jan 6


      Why are we here? What Shakespeare have you read? Liked? Disliked? Historical Overview Indepednent Sonnet Research. See directions in blog
      Jan 9
      Jan 10 Jan 11 Jan 12 Jan 13
      Sonnet reports and discussion "Procreation sonnets": 1-17. Read as assigned in class.  Admiring sonnets to a young man: Read 20, 29, 36 and 38. Admiring sonnets with a thematic focus on time: 55, 60, 64, 73 and 74 Rivalry: 79, 80, 83 and 84; 
      Jan 16 Jan 17 Jan 18 Jan 19
      Jan 20
      Martin Luther King, Jr Holiday "Black" Lady sonnets: 127, 130, 131, 132, 147 Will I am: Sonnets 135, 136, 143 Sex and Desire in the Sonnets: 147-152 Sonnet Readings
      Jan 23 Jan 24 Jan 25 Jan 26 Jan 27
      Acting Introduction: What ix X
      More in the vein of "What is X?" Twelfth Night Twelfth Night Twelfth Night
      Jan 30 Jan 31 Feb 1
      Feb 2
      Feb 3
      Merchant of Venice Merchant of Venice Merchant of Venice Merchant of Venice Drama Club Work Day
      Feb 6
      Feb 7
      Feb 8
      Feb 9
      Feb 10
      Still MOV Hamlet Act I Hamlet Act II Drama Club Work Day/101 Portfolios Hamlet Act III
      Feb 13 Feb 14 Feb 15 Feb 16 Feb 17
      Hamlet Act IV Hamlet Act V & seminar practice, draft overview Draft Response Day Seminar I and Drama Club Work Day Seminar I and Drama Club Work Day
      Feb 20 Feb 21 Feb 22 Feb 23 Feb 24
      Presidents' Day Holiday Literature Review I Due Richard III Richard III Drama Club Work Day
      Feb 27 Feb 28
      Feb 29
      Mar 1
      Mar 2
      Richard III Richard III Midsummer Night's Dream Midsummer Night's Dream Drama Club Work Day
      Mar 5
      Mar 6
      Mar 7
      Mar 8
      Mar 9
      Midsummer Night's Dream Midsummer Night's Dream Drama Club Work Day Literature Review II Draft Response Day Drama Club Presentations
      Mar 12 Mar 13 Mar 14 Mar 15 Mar 16
      Drama Club Presentations Drama Club Presentations 101 Portfolio Readings Literature Review II Due Dead Day: No classes! No tests! No papers due!
      Mar 19
      Mar 20 Mar 21 Mar 22 Mar 23
      Final: 11:30-1:30 Finals Finals