|
Bradley Bleck Office: 5-157 Phone: Office 533-3572 |
Office Hours: 8:30 to 9:30 a.m. Daily, and by appointment most afternoons email: bradbATspokanefallsDOTedu |
Official Course Description: Students read, analyze, interpret and evaluate Shakespeare’s plays and also sonnets. In addition, they learn about the historical, cultural and social milieu in which Shakespeare wrote his works. Students develop strategies for breaking Shakespeare’s language barrier and learn to analyze plot, character, imagery and theme. Prerequisite SFCC only: recommended minimum reading placement score: COMPASS 80, ASSET 40.
Unofficial course description: In this class we will read, discuss, and write about Shakespeare and Elizabethan culture. In doing so, we'll examine the role of literature and the shaping of a nation and national identity as it applies to our lives through a look at such things as Puritanism, the Reformation (and Counter Reformation), various English Revolutions, and the role of the arts in cultures. To make this happen, we'll be looking at Shakespeare's drama and sonnets to develop some understanding of our Anglo-Saxon cultural & heritage. We will be exploring a variety of questions, including, but not limited to:
As members of the class, I expect you to completely read all material as assigned prior to listed discussion dates, to have completed journals when assigned, to take part in discussions, to write well developed literature reviews that focus on the readings and topics under discussion and to complete assigned projects. You should budget at least 15 hours a week for the course (10 hours outside of class for reading, writing, and working). We will discuss any relevant topics that come to the fore as a result of reading in this class and you will be allowed similar latitude in your writing. Topics can be personal, historical, political, social, literary, or whatever.
Additionally, when it comes to being good readers, don't think you can read a play or sonnet once and make sense of it. Good readers are re-readers. I suggest, at the very least, when you are assigned a play that you sit down and read the whole thing and that you reread each act the night before it will be discussed in class. This is a bare minimum that probably won't prepare you to succeed on the mid-term and final exams. Annotating the text as you read will also help you understand and remember.
My hope is to help you enjoy and understand Shakespeare, provide you with some tools for increased understanding of the Shakespeare you read (or at least an idea of where to find material that will help you increase your understanding), and help you formulate and express your thoughts--written and spoken--concerning Shakespeare. Keep in mind I am not some Shakespeare oracle. I prefer to explain what people do not understand and to provide background and context for the writings we will read and let you puzzle things out as much as possible. While I will lecture some on important ideas and considerations, don't expect me to explain what writings "mean." I don't have all the answers to what we will read (assuming such answers exist). This does not mean that a piece of literature means whatever you want it to mean; interpretations need to be based on specific elements and their contexts within the text and the forces that led to the production of the text. However, I have considerable experience reading, studying, interpreting, and criticizing literature. This I will share with you.
I stole these from a Huffington-Post article:
Normally in a literature class you would read a novel (or some other extended work) and develop a presentation based on the chosen text. In this instance, each drama club group is going to be putting on a class-length performance of a play chosen from those not assigned for whole class reading. You will have class time each week to prepare. Since most of Shakespeare's plays take from three to four hours to perform when unabridged, your task is to boil the play down to something of an essence and perform it. Costumes, props and anything else necessary to the successful staging of a play is what you are expected to cover.
The primary thrust of this assignment is to propel you to engage in effective research, to understand the scholarship taking place with regard to what you are writing about, and your demonstrating that you can effectively engage not just the assigned readings, but the scholarship as well. To this end, the writing assignments consist of a mini-literature review.
Your essay/literature review must contain the following:
When you have a topic:
Every essay must have a title. The rules for titles are that they use the same font and same font size as the rest of the essay. Capitalize the first, last, and important words in-between. This means you typically capitalize nouns and verbs. You do not capitalize (except if they are the first or last word in the title) articles (the, an, a), prepositions (of, below, near, above, etc.) or conjunctions (and, but, or, etc.). Typically you want the title to contain the main point in the essay, but that point needs to be reduced to three or four words. The title should be centered, but when submitting via email this is often hard to do.
When submitting an essay, the header should look like this:
Your Name
Course
Instructor's Name
Due Date
A Title that Predicts Essay Development
First, every essay will have an introduction, Body, and Conclusion. It is often said that the introduction tells the reader what the essay will tell the reader, the body of the essay tells the reader what the essay is about, and the conclusion tells the reader what the essay just told them.
For the narrative, it might be easier to think of the introduction as the beginning, the body as the middle, and the conclusion as the end.
With the introduction, I am the only reader, as are members of your peer groups, who is required to read your writing. Your job in the first paragraph is to persuade the reader to continue on.
Consider the audience when thinking about the type of introduction/conclusion you are going to use.
Answering these questions will give you considerable detail for a narrative essay. Develop the answers as fully as possible and you will go a long way toward completing your narrative essay.
(includes one or more of the following)
(includes the following)
(includes one or more of the following)
Syllogism |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| If 'A' is True | Major Premise/ Generalization |
All Humans are Mortal | Every Virtue is Laudable |
| And 'B' is True | Minor Premise/ Specific Instance |
John is a Human | Kindness is a Virtue |
| 'C' Must be True | Conclusion | John is Mortal | Kindness is Laudable |
Toulmin Model of Logic |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Claim | Conclusion | Raymond is an American citizen | |
| Data | Minor Premise | Raymond was born in Puerto Rico | |
| Warrant | Major Premise | Anyone born in Puerto Rico is an American citizen |
|
The warrant is false because a French tourist who has a child
while vacatioining in Puerto Rico may chose between American and
French citizenship for their child.
| Claim | Conclusion | Raymond is probably an American citizen |
| Data | Minor Premise | Raymond was born in Puerto Rico |
| Warrant | Major Premise | Anyone born in Puerto Rico is entitled to American citizenship |
Here the warrant is accurate given the above information and
the reasoning is logical given the information. The warrant
establishes a trustworthy relationship between the Data and the
Claim.
Outside sources are materials that come from somewhere other than your memory or direct experience. These outside sources often makeup what is considered hard evidence in an argumentative, or other, research essay. These sources include, but are not limited to, books, magazines, academic or professional journals, radio and television shows, films, and the testimony of experts.
Like many things, authority and reliability depends on the source. Because, as a writer, you want to maintain a moderate tone and not drive your readers away, you have to choose your sources wisely. If you were to write an essay about animal testing, there are three (at least) sources of printed information available.
One of the sources is the Humane Society of the United States. The HSUS is a fairly mainstream, conservative organiazation. They tend to work behind the scenes in a low key way. HSUS runs animal shelters, spay and neuter programs, and looks into the treatment of both livestock and pets. The HSUS also engages in traditional political actions such as lobbying Congress.
Another organization and source of information on animals is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. PETA is a bit more high profile than HSUS and many prominent people are members. If you have seen the "Don't Wear Fur" campaign where a group of models and moviestars stand behind a banner bearing that proclamation, you have seen some of the information PETA puts out. They are more activist and outspoken than the HSUS, but tend to have pretty much the same goals and act within the law.
Also among those advocating animal rights is the Animal Liberation Front. ALF is among the more radical of animal rights organizations, and if you believe the newspaper reports, they are also more likely to act outside of the law. If you have read stories in the paper about break-ins at research labs where animals are set free, someone holding philosophies similar to ALF's may well have been involved.
These characterizations are meant to show that while people and organizations can have similar goals, they can also have different approaches to achieving those goals. These approaches are products of the biases we all have. As a writer you need to be aware of the biases your sources have. If you are not aware of the biases, your argument may end up being undermined by them. If you are writing an argument to support a ban on animal testing and you know your audience wants to continue testing, which source of information might be the most likely to sway their opinion? The radical or the mainstream? The moderate or the in-your-face? If you can get the same information from a more conservative source, it may have a greater effect on your audience.
There are three general categories of journals and magazines and you should understand how they are different.
The first category is written by a generalist for the general public. General consumption news and entertainment magazines fit into this category. Often the writer is someone with no specific training or experience in the topic they are writing about. In a sense they become "instant experts" on their topic as they compose the essay or article. Publications such as Time, Newsweek, Rolling Stone, Ebony, and Esquire fit into this category. These publications will typically contain a good deal of advertising. These publications rely on advertising dollars to sustain themselves and they are in business to turn a profit as well as provide the public with information.
The second category is written by an expert for the general public. This expert may not have specific training in their topic but they may have devoted their career to writing about certain issues, or they may be a professional intheir field but prefer to write to a general audience rather than to or for their peers. Publications such as the Smithsonian, Psychology Today and National Geographic can be considered to fit into this category. These publications usually rely more on subscription dollars than advertising dollars to continue their existance, but there will be some advertising, usually concentrated in the front of the publication.
The third category is written by an expert for other experts. These are typically professional and academic journals. Titles include College English, Teaching English In a Two Year College, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Lancet (the British version of JAMA), and many more too numerous to list. A quick trip through the library will provide you a quick glimpse of what is available. These publications are nearly devoid of advertising and those advertisements that are there usually are for textbooks and professional studies related to the field that the journal covers. Also, while publication in the first two categories requires the writer to simply please the editor, publication in professional and academic journals requires peer review. Peer review means that the essay was sent to the editor, who inturn sent the essay to reviewers, who critique the manuscript and send it back to the editor and writer for revision. These cycle can be repeated. Essays in professional journals will also contain a complete list of source materials where the articles and essays in the first two categories may or may not name their sources.
Journals and Magazines are typically more current than books, often making them a better source of information. They also do not require you to read a whole book to get the little bits of information you might be looking for. By the time a book reaches the shelves of a library, it may be as much as two or three years behind current scholarship on the topic. There is a long process of researach, writing, and revision before a book even reaches the mechancial publishing stage where type setting, galley proofing, final publication and distribution can take at least six months. The general rule of thumb is don't use any source that is older than 10 years unless it is a piece of work absolutely critical to a particular field's scholarship.
Pesornal Interviews are often one good way to get the testimony of experts. Of course, as you can see by watching news coverage of any trial, you can find an expert to say just about anything you need to be said. Lawyers are a good example to illustrate this: Lawyers are experts in the field of law, but for every lawyer who wins a case, and has presumably made the proper judgement about the law and circumstances in question, there is a lawyer who loses that same case who made a less valid interpretation of the same circumstances.
You've likely heard all of the hype about the Information Superhighway that is the World Wide Web and Internet. And there is as much good information out on the Web as many Net-heads say. However, there is at least as much garbage out on the Web as there is useful information. The problem then becomes how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly. Remember that anyone can put up a web site. AS with any other form of publication there are no editors. Once in awhile aservice provider won't allow certain material on their machines, but that is rare. On the Web, be extra critical of what you see. Along with solid information and scholarship, there are a lot of wackos out there. If you are not sure about the material you find at web sites, use the questioning strategies in the following two links to give you a better idea about the material on any given web site.
Mark Twain said "There are lies, damned lies, and statistics." A more recent maxim about statistics is that they are like bikinis: Interesting for what they reveal, but essential for what they cover up. Keep both of these points in mind as you provide your reader with statistics to clarify or support a point in your essay. While statistics can bring certain parts of an argument to light, don't rely on them to make your argument for you and don't use so many of them as to make your essay read like a spread sheet. Your reader won't get your argument if they fall asleep!
Paragraphs give the writer control and the reader access. Paragraphs are often seen as one distinct space for developing one distinct idea.
Depends on writer's purpose and reader's needs. One word to ?
Short paragraphs make for quicker reading, but a choppier flow often results.
Thesis statement for a paragraph. Asserts a sub-point of the main thesis point. Used to orient the reader to what comes next. Orients the writer to what you are going to say next.
poor: How life is in a ghetto.
better: Residents of a ghetto tend to have a higher death rate, a higher infant mortality rate, and a higher unemployment rate than do residents of the suburbs.
poor: Do Americans really need large refrigerators?
better: If Americans did their marketing daily, as do most Europeans, they could save energy because they could use smaller refrigerators.
poor: The literature of mythology contains many resurrection stories.
better: One of the oldest resurrection myths is the story of the Egyptian god Osiris.
poor: All novelists seek the truth, and some novelists are good psychologists.
better: In their attempt to probe human nature, many novelist become excellent psychologists.
poor: In my opinion public buildings should be required by law to have no-smoking zones because of the adverse effects on health of "passive smoke."
better: Public buildings should be required by law to have no-smoking zones because of the adverse effects on health of "passive smoking."
poor: Religion as part of the school curriculum should be avoided because it can cause trouble.
better: Religion as part of the school curriculum should be avoided because each student in a classroom may have a different religion.
poor: Homosexuality is a status offense to the effect that the participants are willing so that the relationship is voluntary in character rather than the type described in a victim-perpetrator model.
better: Homosexuality between consenting adults should be considered an alternate life-style rather than a crime.
poor: The Amazons of today are trying to purge all the stag words from the language.
better: Feminists are trying to eliminate the use of sex-biased words from public documents and publications.
Use this process as one way that you can narrow the focus of your essay and come up with something approaching a workable thesis statement.
The Subject of your essay will typically be part of the assignment. In your first essay (the narrative), the subject was you--the writer. With this second essay, the subject is how someone in your life is important to you.
Having chosen your subject, the next step is finding a topic that meets the requirements of the assignment. With the narrative you needed to tell a story about yourself that was interesting or important and helped make you the person you are today. Some have written about a parent's illness, mishaps with the police, an accident involving their child, and so on.
With the second assignment you are to make some point about a particular person and their importance in your life.
For the third assignment, let us look at the treatment of the nuclear power industry on the Internet. Notice how we have narrowed the topic from a social issue and its treatment on the Internet to a specific topic: the treatment of the nuclear power industry on the Internet. The next step is developing a purpose for the essay.
The essay's purpose is what was referred to as the 'rhetorical goal' in the first assignment's readings. Establishing this goal may be the most important step of composing the essay. Without this goal, it is difficult, if not impossible, to make decisions about such things as whether the chosen details are relevant, whether the essay makes the point you hope for, or whether you are done or not. This is where a purpose statement comes in handy.
Try writing a statement something like this: "The purpose of my essay is to show my classmates and teacher (your intended or assigned audience) that such and such is true." An example follows.
To get a thesis statement from a purpose statment, simply omit the first section of the purpose statement:
This leaves us with a thesis statement:
This is a statement that readers will most likely either agree or disagree with. Such a thesis statement puts the writer in the place of having to prove their point. The writer and reader can also evaluate each piece of support material in relation to the thesis to gauge its relevancy and importance to the essay and the essay's argument.
When writing an essay that makes a point, that point is typically expressed in the essay's thesis statement. For this course, that thesis is also referred to as the essay's goal, the essay's claim, the essay's controlling idea, or the point of the essay. If you are unsure about your essay’s goal, then check the file "One way to compose a thesis" that includes this material.
Because this thesis is the point that the essay seeks to make or discuss, the material presented in the essay, the evidence and details, should all work to support the thesis. If the evidence/detail does not support the thesis, then it most likely should be cut from the essay.
Often the best way to know if the evidence supports the claim is to explain how the evidence supports the claim. If you cannot construct this explanatory link between the evidence and claim, then it is not likely your reader will either. As the writer, it is your job to construct the links between your evidence and your claims. It is your job to make it as easy as possible for the reader see things your way.
Providing this explanatory link between your data and claim forces the reader to see things your way, at least for as long as they are reading the essay. If you do not provide this link, then either your reader will not make the link you are hoping for or they won't even try to make any link. When you provide the link, as the writer, you have greater control over the response of the reader.
In brief, a outline of the essay would look like this:
Keep this in mind as you are working on the essay and revisions.
On the Works Cited page, give the title of the article "in quotes," the name of the newspaper underlined or italicized, the day, month, and year if the article's publication, a colon, and the section and page's name underlined or italicized, the volume number, the year (in parentheses), and the inclusive page numbers of the article.
Smith, John. "The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts." Psychology Today Jan. - Feb. 1996: 23-25.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and page number on which the quoted material appears in the journal.
(Smith 24)
On the Works Cited page, do the same as above but put the authors name first. Note that the name is in reverse order. Also note that if the newspapers name does not give the city of origin, you put the city in [brackets] after the name.
Smith, John. The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts. Daily Bugle [Los Angeles] 29 Feb. 1996: A1+.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the authors last name and the section and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the paper.
(Smith A1)
On the Works Cited page, give the authors name, the title of the article in quotes, the name of the magazine underlined or italicized, the day, month and year of the articles publication , a colon, and the inclusive page numbers of the article.
Smith, John. The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts. Newsweek 29 Feb.
1996: 23-25.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the authors last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the magazine.
(Smith 23)
On the Works Cited page, give the authors name, the title of the article in quotes, the name of the magazine underlined or italicized, the months and year of the articles publication, a colon, and the inclusive page numbers of the article.
Smith, John. The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts. Texas Monthly Feb. 1996: 23-25
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the authors last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the magazine.
(Smith 24)
On the Works Cited page, give the authors name, the title of the article in quotes, the name of the magazine underlined or italicized, the months and year of the articles publication, a colon, and the inclusive page numbers of the article.
Smith, John. The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts. Psychology Today Jan. - Feb. 1996: 23-25
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the authors last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the magazine.
(Smith 24)
On Works Cited page, give the authors name, the title of article "in quotes," the journals name underlined or italicized, the volume number, the year (in parentheses), and the inclusive page numbers of the article.
Smith, John. "The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts." Journal for the Spread of Peanut Butter 22 (1996): 23-25.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the authors last name and page number on which the quoted material appears in the journal.
(Smith 24)
After giving the journals name, include volume number and issue number, year (in parentheses), and page numbers.
Smith, John. "The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts." Journal for the Spread of Peanut Butter 22.3 (1996) : 23-25.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the authors last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the journal.
(Smith 24)
After giving the journals name, include issue number, year (in parentheses), and page numbers.
Smith, John. "The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts." Journal for the Spread of
Peanut Butter 3 (1996) : 23-25.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the authors last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the journal.
(Smith 24)
After giving the journal's name, include volume number and issue number, year (in parentheses), and page numbers.
Smith, John. "The Rising Cost of Peanut Butter Has Consumers Going Nuts." Journal for the Spread of Peanut Butter 22.3 (1996) : 23-25.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the journal.
(Smith 24)
On the Works Cited page, give the author's name, the book's title underlined or italicized, the city of publication, a colon, the publisher, and the year of publication.
Smith , John. The Great Peanut Butter War. New York: Houghton, 1996.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.
(Smith 24)
On the Works Cited page give the names of the authors in the order presented on the cover. All other information is the same as with one author. Note that the second author's name is not reversed.
Smith, John, and Jane Doe. The Great Peanut Butter War Revisited. New York: Houghton, 1996.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last names and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.
(Smith and Does 24)
On the Works Cited page, give only the name of the first author and then the designation et al. To stand for the others. All other information is the same as with one author. Note that if a subtitles given on the cover, it appears after the main title, separated by a colon.
Smith, John, et. al. The Great Peanut Butter War: The Jelly and Honey Battles. New York: Houghton, 1996.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name, the designation et al., and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.
(Smith et al. 24)
On the Works Cited page, give the authors name, the title of work ("in quotes" if it is a short story, poem, or essay; underlined or italicized if it is the name of a novel or a play), the title of the anthology underlined or italicized, the editor of anthology, the volume number (if necessary), the city of publication, a colon, the publisher, the year of publication, and inclusive page numbers of the work as it appears in the anthology.
Smith, John. "Ode to Peanut Butter." The Norton Anthology of Peanut Butter Literature. Ed. P. Brittle. Vol. 2. New York: Houghton, 1996. 34-36.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.
(Smith 35)
For a reprinted article excerpt in Contemporary Literary Criticism, Twentieth Century Literary Criticism, Nineteenth Century Literary Criticism, Short Story Criticism, Poetry Criticism, Drama Criticism, Literary Criticism from 1400 to 1800, and Classical and Medieval Literary Criticism, use the anthology format.
Bayley, John. "Return of the Native." Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Jean C. Stine and Daniel Marowski. Vol. 31. Detroit: Gale, 1985. 260-261.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.
(Bayley 260)
For signed articles in the Dictionary of Literary Biography follow the anthology format.
Keating, H. R. F. "Agatha Christie." Dictionary of Literary Biography. Ed. Bernard Benstock and Thomas F. Staley. Vol. 27. Detroit: Gale, 1989. 68-82.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.
(Keating 68)
To cite articles from the Opposing Viewpoint series include the name of the author of the article, title of article "in quotation marks," series title underlined or italicized, editor, place of publication, publishers name and year of publication, and page numbers for article you are citing.
Sullum, Jacob. "The Death Penalty Is Just." The Death Penalty: Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Carol Wekesser. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1991. 57-60.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.
(Sullum 57)
For unsigned biographical information in CLC, TCLC, NCLC, SSC, PC, LC,CMLC, use the following format.
"Czeslaw Milosz." Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Jean C. Stine and Daniel G. Marowski. Vol. 31. Detroit: Gale, 1985. 258-259.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the title of the entry "in quotes" and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.
("Czeslaw Milosz" 258)
"Joel Williamson." Contemporary Authors. Ed. Donna Olendorf. Vol. 144. Detroit: Gale, 1994. 487
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the title of the entry "in quotes" and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.
("Joel Williamson" 487)
"Maud Hart Lovelace." Contemporary Authors New Revision Series. Ed. Susan M. Trosky. Vol. 39 Detroit: Gale, 1992. 240-241.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the title of the entry "in quotes" and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the book.
("Maud Hart Lovelace." 240)
To cite files from the World Wide give the author's name (if known), the full title of the web page quoted from "in quotation marks," the title of the web site's homepage (from the window bar) underlined or in italics, the full http address, and the date of visit (in parentheses).
American Dental Association. "Fluorides and Fluoridation." Facts About Fluoride.Http://www.ada.org/consumer/fluoride/articles/fa01.html. (10 Feb. 1997).
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name ( or an abbreviation if written by a corporate author with a long name) and the page number on which the quoted material appears on a printout of the web page. Look at the beginning of the web page or at the very end (see whose name follows the © symbol) to locate the author.
(American Dental Association 2)
Entries from an electronic online journal should include: name of the author (if given), title of the document "in quotation marks," title of the journal underlined or italicized, volume number, issue number or the identifying number, year or date of publication (in parentheses), number of pages or paragraphs (if given) or n.pag ("no pagination"), publication medium (Online), name of the computer network, and date of access.
Galston, William. "Divorce American Style." The Public Interest 124 (Summer 1996) : 15 pp. Online. Expanded Academic ASAP. 11 Feb. 1997.
When giving the parenthetical citation in the body of the paper, include the author's last name and the page number on which the quoted material appears in the printout of the information.
(Galston 3)
SFCC Library: Electronic Resources contains a database called ProQuest. proQuest contains magazine and journal articles of a more scholarly sort. You can start your search by using your author's name and then narrow it down from there if necessary. The best articles, the most reliable information, is found in the scholarly publications. Trade magazines can be good, as can magazines in general. newspapers tend to be the least helpful, but you never know. Click on the Proquest link found on the Electronic Resources page.
Literary Databases also contain a good deal of relevant information on the various authors. Within these articles, you may find some information relating to some point you are working to develop.
SFCC's Book Catalog may also be of help, but you'll want to get to campus to pick up books. I'm not sure how fast they are about getting books out to rural areas.
Answer each of the below questions for essays written by each of your book club members (the five member group(s) need respond to just three of their group members' essays--just be sure everyone gets three). Please complete your responses by the stated deadline.
Pragmatism is a collection of many different ways of thinking. Most of the thinkers who describe themselves as pragmatists point to some connection with practical consequences or real effects as vital components of both meaning and truth. Some pragmatists object to the view that beliefs represent reality and argue that beliefs are dispositions which qualify as true or false depending on how helpful a disposition proves in accomplishing the believer's goals. For this type of pragmatist it is only in the struggle of intelligent organisms with the surrounding environment that theories acquire meaning, and only with a theory's success in this struggle that it becomes true. Pragmatists do not hold that anything that is practical or useful, or that anything that helps to survive merely in the short-term, should be regarded as true. Instead, most of them argue that what should be taken as true is that which contributes the most good over the longest course.
Deconstruction is used to denote a philosophy of meaning that deals with the ways that meaning is constructed and understood by writers, texts, and readers. One way of understanding the term is that it involves discovering, recognizing, and understanding the underlying — and unspoken and implicit — assumptions, ideas, and frameworks that form the basis for thought and belief. It has various shades of meaning in different areas of study and discussion, and is, by its very nature, difficult to define without depending on "un-deconstructed" concepts. Deconstruction is neither an analysis, a critique, a method, an act, nor an operation, but an attempt to demonstrate that Western thought has not satisfied its quest for a "transcendental signifier" that will give meaning to all other signs.
Feminist literary criticism is informed by feminist theory, or by the politics of feminism more broadly. In the most general and simple terms, feminist literary criticism before the 1970s -- the first and second waves of feminism -- was concerned with the politics of women's authorship and the representation of women's condition within literature. With the more complex conceptions of gender and subjectivity and third-wave feminism, feminist criticism has taken a variety of new routes. It has considered gender in the terms of existing relations of power, and as a concrete political investment. While it has been closely associated with the birth and growth of queer studies, the more traditionally central feminist concern with the representation and politics of women's lives remains.
Formalism/New Criticism: While these two schools are separate and distinct, they can also be looked at together as both privledge the text itself over what goes into the making or reading of the text. They sometimes refers to inquiry into the form (rather than the content) of works of literature, such as plot, genre concerns (such as with a captivity narrative) but usually refers broadly to approaches to interpreting or evaluating literary works that focus on features of the text itself (especially properties of its language) rather than on the contexts of its creation (biographical, historical or intellectual) or the contexts of its reception. Adherents were/are emphatic in their advocacy of close reading and attention to texts themselves, and their rejection of criticism based on extra-textual sources, especially biography.
Marxist criticism is a loose term describing literary criticism informed by the philosophy and/or the politics of Marxism. The simplest goals of Marxist literary criticism can include an assessment of the political "tendency" of a literary work, determining whether its social content or its literary form are "progressive"; however, this is by no means the only or the necessary goal. Marxist literary critics have also been concerned with applying lessons drawn from the realm of aesthetics to the realm of politics. Marxist criticism can be about identifying the class struggle within a text.
New Historicism is an approach to literary criticism and theory based on the premise that a literary work should be considered a product of the time, place and circumstances of its composition rather than as an isolated creation of genius. It had its roots in a reaction to the "New Criticism" of formal analysis of works of literature that were seen by a new generation of professional readers as taking place in a vacuum. New Historicists aim simultaneously to understand the work through its historical context and to understand cultural and intellectual history through literature, which documented the new discipline of the history of ideas. Michel Foucault based his approach both on his theory of the limits of collective cultural knowledge and on his technique of examining a broad array of documents in order to understand the episteme of a particular time. New Historicism is claimed to be a more neutral approach to historical events, and is sensitive towards different cultures.
Post-colonialism (also known as post-colonial theory) grapples with the legacy of colonial rule. As a literary theory or critical approach it deals with literature produced in countries that were once, or are now, colonies of other countries. It may also deal with literature written in or by citizens of colonizing countries that takes colonies or their peoples as its subject matter. Post-colonialism deals with many issues for societies that have undergone colonialism: the dilemmas of developing a national identity in the wake of colonial rule; the ways in which writers from colonized countries attempt to articulate and even celebrate their cultural identities and reclaim them from the colonizers; the ways knowledge of colonized people have served the interests of colonizers, and how knowledge of subordinate people is produced and used; and the ways in which the literature of the colonial powers is used to justify colonialism through the perpetuation of images of the colonized as inferior. The creation of binary oppositions structure the way we view others. Such opposition was used to justify a destiny to rule on behalf of the colonizer, or 'white man's burden'.
Psychoanalytic literary criticism is criticism which, in method, concept, theory or form, is influenced by the tradition of psychoanalysis begun by Sigmund Freud. The object of psychoanalytic literary criticism, at its very simplest, can be the psychoanalysis of the author or of a particularly interesting character. In this directly therapeutic form, it is very similar to psychoanalysis itself, closely following the analytic interpretive process discussed in Freud's Interpretation of Dreams. The concepts of psychoanalysis can be deployed with reference to the narrative or poetic structure itself, without requiring access to the authorial psyche (an interpretation motivated by Lacan's remark that "the unconscious is structured like a language").
Reader-response criticism is a literary theory that arose in response to the textual emphasis of New Criticism from the 1940s to the 1960s in the West. New Criticism had emphasized that only that which is within a text is part of the meaning of a text. No appeal to the authority or intention of the author, nor to the psychology of the reader, was allowed for the most orthodox New Critics. Reader-response criticism is a group of approaches to understanding literature that have in common an emphasis on the reader's role in the creation of the meaning of a literary work. Reader-response theory recognizes the reader as an active agent who imparts "real existence" to the work by reading it and completes its meaning "by applying codes and strategies". It is concerned with the reader's contribution to a text. It stands in total opposition to the text-oriented theories of formalism and the New Criticism, in which the reader's role interpreting literary works are not taken into account. In general, one can group reader-response theorists into three groups: those who focus upon the reader's experience and psychology, those who concentrate on the linguistic and rhetorical dynamic of audience, and those who concentrate on readers as cultural and historical ciphers.
Structuralism is an approach to analysing narrative material by examining the underlying invariant structure. For example, a literary critic applying a structuralist literary theory might say that the authors of the West Side Story did not write anything "really" new, because their work has the same structure as Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. In both texts a girl and a boy fall in love (a "formula" with a symbolic operator between them would be "Boy +LOVE Girl") despite the fact that they belong to two groups that hate each other ("Boy's Group -LOVE Girl's Group") and conflict is resolved by their death. The versatility of structuralism is such that a literary critic could make the same claim about a story of two friendly families ("Boy's Family +LOVE Girl's Family") that arrange a marriage between their children despite the fact that the children hate each other ("Boy -LOVE Girl") and then the children commit suicide to escape the arranged marriage; the justification is that the second story's structure is an 'inversion' of the first story's structure: the relationship between the values of love and the two pairs of parties involved have been reversed. Structuralistic literary criticism argues that the "novelty value of a literary text" can lie only in new structure, rather than in the specifics of character development and voice in which that structure is expressed.
Type any of the above terms into wikipedia.org and you'll see where I got my summaries, and then some.
Summary must be devoid of summarizer’s stated opinion, must maintain perspective and proportion of original, but must be in summarizer’s own words.
Adapted from Read and Respond by Swinton and Agoposowicz
Online Reading Materials
Plato described plot as the imitation of action or the
arrangement of the incidents. The arrangement of the incidents or events must have a
causal, inevitable relationship. in other words, there must be a readily identifiable
cause-and-effect relationship in the chain of events.
Others have broken plot down to five sections. If you ever watch
Elizabethan drama, the five acts will follow the below progression. These five steps are
one of the best ways to break down a stories components.
While the bombardment was knocking the trench to pieces at
Possalta, he lay very flat and sweated and prayed oh jesus christ get me out of here.
Dear jesus please get me out. Christ please please please christ. If
you'll only keep me from getting killed I'll do anything you say. I believe in you and
I'll tell everyone in the world that you are the only one that matters. Please
please dear jesus. The shelling moved further up the line. We went back to work on
the trench and inthe morning the sun came up and the day was hot and muggy and cheeful and
quiet. The next night back at Mestre he did not tell the girl he went upstairs wtih at the
Villa Rosa about Jesus. And he never told anybody.
--from Ernst Hemingway's In Our Time
This passage contains the story's Situation
(relationships, compulsions, oppositions, conflict, instability):
While the bombardment was knocking the trench to pieces at
Possalta, he lay very flat and sweated and prayed oh jesus christ get me out of here.
h2 align="center">Looking at Plot: Complication
The Complication (deepening of oppositions,
heightening of conflicts, intensification of tension, the plot thickens):
Dear jesus please get me out. Christ please please
please christ. If you'll only keep me from getting killed I'll do anything you say.
I believe in you and I'll tell everyone in the world that you are the only one that
matters. Please please dear jesus.
Climax (revelation, recognition, crisis):
The shelling moved further up the line.
Denouement/Unraveling ( reappraisal,
showdown,catastrophe, solution ):
We went back to work on the trench and in the morning the sun
came up and the day was hot and muggy and cheerful and quiet.
Resolution (stability with change) :
The next night back at Mestre he did not tell the girl he
went upstairs wtih at the Villa Rosa about Jesus. And he never told anybody.
When you read a narrative, it helps to be able to tell the
difference between the story and the plot. The sequence
of events which transpire, beginning with what happens first and continuing to what
happens last, is called the story; the arrangement is chronological, and no special
emphasis or importance is given to those events. Plot, on the other hand, is the
manipulation of the events of the story by the author in order to create impact, to give
special meaning to the story's themes, or to develop the characters. It is important to
remember that the plot is wholly shaped by the author to his design. One can draw a
diagram of a story or a plot to detect their structures and follow their movements. A
story, based on the definition given above, looks like this:
----.----.------.----.------.----------.-->
A B C
D E
F
Events A-F appear on the line in the order they
transpired, and the story heads in only one direction, forward. Plots have more shape when
you try to diagram them. Here are three common plot structures:
The Aristotelian plot generally orders
its events (A-F) chronologically but begins with an initial conflict, usually some sort of
problem, that the hero (protagonist) must solve. However, the hero finds obstacles or
barriers (complications)--usually natural such as storms or wild animals, from opposing
characters (villains or antagonists), or from weaknesses within the hero's own
character--and as the hero attempts to overcome these obstacles, it creates a rise in
tension in the action (what the characters do within the story) and in the readers. The
story nears its conclusion in the climax when the obstacles are overcome and the initial
conflict is resolved. Any loose ends in the story are solved in the denouement, and the
narrative officially ends. A common form of story shaped by the Aristotelian plot is the
quest. In the quest, the hero is forced on a perilous journey to attain some goal. Often,
the hero learns about himself or herself and undergoes improvement as a person as the goal
is approached, and just as often, the hero finds it is this self-improvement that holds
the key to his or her success.
In the Loop, the story begins in the
present (also called the frame of the story) to establish the context of the narrative but
then returns to the past, where most of the action takes place. Thus, the sequence of
events (A-F) is drastically altered. Later in the story, the action returns to the
present, with the intent that the information given about the past will help the reader
understand what is happening in the spent. Scene E, where the juxtaposition of the two
time periods takes place, thus becomes crucial to our understanding of the plot.
In the X, the plot follows the fortunes
of two major characters. At the beginning, one character (A) is somehow superior to the
other (B), either physically, mentally, economically, spiritually, socially, etc. Often,
this is expressed in the form of a power struggle, with character A having power over
character B. But as the story progresses, Character A declines or worsens as a character,
while character B improves; if there is a power relationship between the two, the reader
can also detect a shift of power. Events A-F, though experienced by both characters, will
have different effects, showing the downfall of the one and the rise of the other. The
crucial event C depicts the moment when the characters trade places, and by the end of the
story, the standing of the characters has been reversed, with character B having the
power.
Crucial to the author's manipulation of the plot is the
idea of information. If the resolution of the plot depends upon the characters solving the
conflicts they face, then it is imperative for the characters to learn how to overcome the
complications in their path. To do this, they must learn something about those
complications, or about themselves, and then be able to act upon what they have learned.
Sometimes, the hero will learn the information he or she needs to resolve the conflict but
may not be in a position to use it. One of the central sources of tension in the story
"I Stand Here Ironing" arises from the fact that the mother, in her memories,
knows exactly why Emily behaves the way she does, but she has been continually prevented
from expressing any of this to Emily, and she finds it impossible to express it to her
unnamed visitor, thus leaving the resolution of the story up in the air. Also, a minor
character might learn something before the hero does because of that character's unique
perspective, and further complications can arise if the character cannot get that
information to the hero. In Othello, for example, Roderigo learns of Iago's
treacherous nature when Iago stabs him in Act V, but his admissions of guilt, and
especially of his part in Cassio's downfall in Act II, come too late to help Othello.
How the information is revealed, and by whom, can be just
as important. For instance, in the Star Wars trilogy, the fact that Luke Skywalker learns
of his father's identity from Darth Vader rather than Ben Kenobi is much more dramatic,
adding an element of shock and surprise. Characters will have "blind spots" when
they are unaware of the information they need, and dramatic irony is created when the
audience knows what the characters do not.
Timing is also crucial. The author can withhold from the
characters the information they need or reveal it as necessary to move the plot forward.
Tragedy and comedy hinge on when the hero overcomes blind spots: if they are overcome in
time, the story ends happily; if not, the story ends tragically.
All of this manipulation will have an effect upon the
audience as well. Our enjoyment of a story, and our understanding of what is happening,
depends heavily upon what we learn about the characters and the problems they face. When
we learn something new about the characters and their situations, we often feel the story
has reached a "turning point," and, as a result, a higher level of tension.
Thus, the author, by determining when to reveal certain pieces of information, can affect
not only the plot, but an audience's response as well.
The author uses several techniques to manipulate
information and shape the story into a plot, and we as an audience can look out for them.
Here is a partial list of techniques:
1) The author chooses when to begin and end the story.
2) The author chooses when to begin and end chapters (if any), often providing
"hooks" to draw readers along and keep them interested.
3) The author chooses the order he wishes to present the events of the story.
4) The author makes transitions in time by employing flashbacks, jump cuts, or parallel
scenes (scenes shown at different times but which happen concurrently). He slows time
within a scene by using description and dialogue, which prolong the pace of the action. He
speeds time with verbal summaries and quick cuts. The pace of drama, unlike fiction, is
influenced more strongly by dialogue because the action on stage can move only as fast as
the characters can speak.
5) The author chooses a narrator. What the narrator knows, perceives and learns can affect
how the plot is resolved (especially if the narrator is a character within the story) and
how it is understood by the audience. This is where point of view and the reliability of
the narrator can become important. Mystery novels often employ a narrator who knows
nothing of the crime so that the solution can be delayed until the end.
6) The author introduces or subtracts characters (or objects or forces) which assist or
prevent the hero from resolving the conflict.
7) The author may use subplots, secondary plots which are analogous to or counterpoints of
the main plot. They will often involve the minor characters and broaden the audience's
understanding of the main plot. Information can be given in subplots which is important in
resolving the central conflict.
Some of the effects these authorial choices have on an
audience are:
1) We feel a sense of opening or closure in the action.
2)We sense a change in the direction of the story--a turning point--for better or worse.
These changes are what create the rise in tension.
3) We feel a heightening of our suspense toward the outcome based on our expectations for
what that outcome will be.
4) We are surprised when those expectations are not met, or met in a way we did not
foresee.
5) We learn something about the characters or the complications that we did not know
before.
6) We see the characters forced to make a decision concerning their course of action.
7) We see the characters withstand reversals (peripety) or make a discovery or recognition
concerning their fate (anagnorisis), often with the latter initiating the former.
**One last thing to remember--a plot will have a story,
but a story will not always have a plot. A plot holds a story within it the way a bottle
holds water, not the other way around.
The more of each element a narrative essay contains, the more
likely that narrative essay is to be effective in communicating
the writer's point and effectively developing the essay's
rhetorical goal.
Perhaps the best Invention strategy for a narrative essay is
The Pentad, which takes into account that every human action is
influenced by five elements: act (what), scene (where, when),
agent (who), agency (how), and purpose (why).
As noted in the invention reading, these elements are useful
because they can be used to analyze events, arguments,
characters, or audiences--anything involving human interaction.
Answering these questions will give you considerable detail
for a narrative essay. Develop the answers as fully as possible
and you will go a long way toward completing your narrative
essay.
!doctype>
content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
Plato described character as the
"Moral constitution of human personality."
Character can also be defined as the
presence of creatures in art that seem to be human beings of one
sort or another or persons sometimes sketched not as a
individual, but as an example of some vice or virtue.
author of a character through direct exposition,
illustrated by action often told either by first person
narrator or omniscient narrator/author
action, with little or no explicit comment by the author;
reader must deduce the attributes of the actor from the
action
character of the impact of actions and emotions on
the character's inner-self, without comment on the
character by the author: reader should come to clear
understanding of the character's attributes.
Static: changes little
or not at all: things happen to character, but nothing happens
within. Pattern of action reveals/exposes character. If character
is revealed bit by bit, character may seem changing, but can be
static.
Dynamic: modified by
actions and experiences.
Flat (one or two
dimensional): constructed around a single idea/quality/
distinguishing behavior; easy to recognize and remember but fails
to recognize the complexities of the ordinary human mind.
Disregards what does not fit the caricature.
Round (three
dimensional): all that a flat character is not: can it surprise
in a convincing way? No surprises = flat, unconvincing in the
surprises = flat
Protagonist: Often
referred to as the "hero" but better thought of as the
character that drives the action of the plot.
Antagonist: Often
referred to as the "bad guy" or the "villain"
but better thought of as the character that stands in the way of
the protagonist.
These roles need not be filled
exclusively by characters representing human beings. For
instance, in Steven Crane's "The Open Boat" the
antagonist could be considered to be nature, the stormy sea, or
fate.
A character in a work of fiction or drama can be defined as a person, animal, place, or
object that influences (or is influenced by) the plot and that demonstrates a unique
personality.
Thus, because the house in The Amityville Horror influences the plot and
demonstrates a personality, it can be considered a character. Likewise, the cat(s) in
Edgar Allan Poe's "The Black Cat" influence the plot and show personality, and
so they can also be considered characters.
Characters can be classified by the amount of influence they have over the plot. If a
character has a large influence on the plotthat is, if the character's actions have
a significant effect on the outcome of the storythen that character is considered a major
(or main) character. On the other hand, if a character has a small influence on the
plotthat is, if the character's actions have little effect on the outcome of the
storythen that character is considered a minor character.
Characters can also be classified by the amount of change they exhibit in their
personalities. If a character undergoes a significant change in personality, then that
character is considered a dynamic character. If a character shows little or no
change in personality, then that character is considered a static character.
Another method of classifying characters is by the fullness of their personalities. If
a character has several well-defined traits and a complex personality, then that character
is considered a round character. If a character has few (if any) defined traits and
a shallow personality, then that character is considered a flat character.
The most important character in a work, the character whom the story or play seems to
follow, is called the hero or the protagonist (this character can also be
called the title character if his/her name is used as the title of the story
or play). The terms hero and protagonist are often used interchangeably, but
in certain contexts, they are different. The word hero, derived from a Greek word
meaning "protector," originally referred to a man born of one mortal and one
immortal parent and known for courageous and noble exploits. We still look up to heroes as
people with higher moral and physical standards than ourselves. However, some
"heroes" engage in questionable or repulsive behavior; for example, the narrator
in Edgar Allan Poe's "The Tell-Tale Heart," who kills his benefactor and buries
him under the floorboards, can hardly be considered noble, so the term hero does
not seem to fit him. The term protagonist is derived from Greek words meaning
"chief actor" or "one who struggles first." However, though the
protagonist is a leader, much like a hero, the term does not carry the connotations of
moral worth as does the word hero. Thus the narrator of "The Tell-Tale
Heart," who is the chief actor of the story, can rightfully be called a protagonist.
In general, the term protagonist can be applied more universally than the term hero.
The hero/protagonist can also be defined as the character who drives the action of the
plot forward; he or she acts, and the other characters react. Again, the protagonist of
"The Tell-Tale Heart" provides us with an example. His growing madness and his
scheme to kill his benefactor are the actions that give the story its meaning; without his
distaste for his benefactor's "Evil Eye," we essentially have no reason for the
story to be told.
Depending on the type of story in which he/she appears, the hero/protagonist may assume
a number of secondary traits. The hero/protagonist of a tragedy, for example, often
suffers a reversal of fortune and falls from a place of prominence in society. Sophocles's
Oedipus, when he learns that he has killed his father and married his mother, abdicates
his title as king of Thebes. In one moment, he is transformed from respected ruler to
despised beggar. The tragic hero/protagonist may also undergo a worsening of character.
Shakespeare's Othello changes from a capable general and loving husband into a capricious
leader and jealous, homicidal revenge-seeker. The tragic hero/protagonist may also become
gradually isolated from his/her society. Shakespeare's Macbeth, after murdering his king,
alienating his friends and allies, and losing his wife, stands alone against his enemies
at the end of the play. The hero/protagonist of a comedy, in contrast, often enjoys an
improvement of fortune, a betterment of character, and a gradual inclusion into his/her
society. In a traditional comedy, the hero/protagonist achieves all three at the end of
the story through marriage, the age-old symbol of a happy union between two people.
The secondary traits of the hero/protagonist may also be determined by how he/she
resolves the conflicts facing him/her. The hero/protagonist may sometimes be classified as
a Bull or a Fox. The Bull is a hero/protagonist who relies on strength to
overcome difficulties. This character type has existed for ages. One prototype, Hercules,
comes to us from Greek Mythology. Hercules is famous for his feats of strength, including
the Twelve Labors. A prototype from the Bible is Sampson, who was terrifically strong but
not very clever; Delilah easily tricked him into revealing the secret of his strength. A
modern-day example of this heroic type would be Arnold Schwartzenegger, who has portrayed
many strong characters in his movies, characters that derive much of their presence from
his muscular physique.
The Fox is a hero/protagonist who relies on cleverness or dexterity to overcome
difficulties. This character type, too, has existed for ages. A famous example in Greek
Mythology is Odysseus, who is renowned for creating the Trojan Horse and for escaping the
Cyclops. In the Bible, Solomon, the ancient ruler of Israel, demonstrates his intelligence
in the well-known story about the two women claiming to be the mother of the same child.
In modern fiction, Sherlock Holmes, the world-famous sleuth, may also be categorized as a
Fox because of his intelligence. An example from modern movies would be Michael J. Fox,
who, as Marty McFly in the movie Back to the Future, escapes from Biff by creating
and using a skateboard.
In some stories, the hero/protagonist may be caught in a dilemma and forced to make a
choice that will affect his/her destiny. In this situation, the hero/protagonist may be
flanked by two characters who each represent one of the choices and who each try to
influence the hero/protagonist to pick the choice they represent. These flanking
characters are sometimes called the Good Angel and the Bad Angel.
In some cartoons, a character, standing in thought, is suddenly visited by an angel on one
shoulder and a devil on the other shoulder, each of whom whispers advice into the
character's ears. A more serious character, Christopher Marlowe's Faust, is also visited
by angels and devils. This image of the hero being flanked by a good and a bad spirit is
derived from the medieval morality plays, in which the hero/protagonist often made moral
decisions that would determine his fate in the afterlife. However, the Good Angel and the
Bad Angel may simply be human characters. Shakespeare's Othello is flanked by his wife
Desdemona, who represents truth, faithfulness, and "turn the other cheek"
justice; and by Iago, who represents treachery, faithlessness, and "eye for an
eye" justice. Oliver Stone uses the Good Angel-Bad Angel format in his movies Platoon
and Wall Street to depict the choices faced by Charlie Sheen's characters. The Good
Angel-Bad Angel characters, as seen above, can appear in many types of stories and dramas.
The character who stands in opposition to the hero/protagonist is called the villain
or the antagonist. As with the terms hero and protagonist, the terms villain
and antagonist are often used interchangeably, but here, too, we should be aware
that these words have different connotations. The word villain originally meant
"feudal serf," one who worked on the country estate of a lord. Because serfs
were of the lowest social class, the term gradually came to mean "vile, brutish
peasant," and now the term describes any "depraved, base-minded" person.
Thus, the word has had strongly negative overtones throughout its history. On the other
hand, the word antagonist is derived from Greek words meaning "one who
struggles against" and lacks the negative connotations of the word villain.
Like the hero/protagonist, the villain/antagonist may assume secondary characteristics
depending on the type of story in which he/she appears. The Bull and Fox categories
described above may sometimes be used to classify the villain/antagonist. Examples of the
Bull as villain are the original Terminator played by Arnold Schwartzenegger, and Biff in Back
to the Future; the supreme example of the Fox as villain is Iago in Shakespeare's Othello.
Some characters may also be classified as stock characters or foil
characters. Stock characters are recognizable stereotypes: the mad scientist, the femme
fatale, the straight-shooting law officer, the psychopathic criminal genius. Each of these
stereotypes has appeared in several stories and so has become familiar. Foil characters,
according to Robert DiYanni, contrast and parallel the main character(s) in a play or
story. Foils are usually minor characters but can sometimes be major characters, and they
are closely associated with the character for whom they serve as a foil. The term foil
derives from jewelry: the foil is the precious metal against which the precious stone is
set; the purpose of the foil is to bring out the brilliance of the gem. Similarly, a foil
character, through comparison and contrast, brings out the brilliance of a main character.
In Shakespeare's Othello, for example, Emilia serves as a foil for Desdemona. In
Act IV, Scene iii, when Desdemona wonders if any woman would cheat on her husband, Emilia
asserts that she would if she gained the world as compensation. Her down-to-earth
attitude, so in contrast to Desdemona's innocence and purity of thought, highlights the
differences between the two women.
In order to analyze a character's personality or motivations, the reader must search
for a pattern in the character's behavior, and in order to discover this pattern, the
reader needs to understand the techniques of characterization, which is the process
by which an author creates a character. Authors rely on four methods to create characters:
1) Through the exposition of the narrator (how the narrator views or judges the
character). The narrator of a story or play may comment on how/he she feels, on what
he/she thinks, on what he/she intends to do. This narrator may also voice an opinion about
other characters, an opinion which helps the reader to understand those characters but
also understand the narrator as well.
2) Through dialogue (what a character says). As with people in real life, what
characters sayand how they say itreveals much about their personalities. A
character's choice of words can reveal his/her feelings and intentions as well as provide
insights into social status, education level, and area of residence. For instance, a
character who says "I don't have any money" will likely have a background
different than a character who says "I ain't got no money."
3) Through action (what a character does). Again, as with people in real life, what
characters doand how they do itreveals much about their personalities. A
character who simply tightens his fist upon hearing that his father has died is likely to
be a different sort of person than one who shouts, screams, and weeps upon hearing the
same news. Also, a reader should make a special note of how closely a character's actions
and dialogue agree. For example, a character who says "I'll be there by
five-thirty" and then arrives at five-thirty can be considered reliable; a character
who says "I'll be there by five-thirty" and then arrives at eleven can be
considered unreliable.
4) Through description (how a character looks/what belongings a character owns). We
often gain our first impression of a person by noting what clothes he or she is wearing,
what car he or she is driving, etc. For example, our impression of a man who wears a grey
flannel suit and drives a Volvo will be different than our impression of a man who wears
shiny black leather and rides a Harley-Davidson.
Staying aware of these methods will help the reader determine if a character is major
or minor, dynamic or static, round or flat. The reader should also use these methods to
determine the reasons behind his/her attitudes towards the characters.
!doctype>
Theme is often seen as the general idea or insight the story,
play, or poem reveals. There is no reason to think that a work of
literature has just one theme. depending upon the perspective
brought to the work, there could be a number of themes.
Theme can also be viewed as an abstract concept made concrete
through its representation in person, action, and image in a work
of literature.
The theme need not be obvious nor a moral or a message, though
some moral inferences may be drawn from the work.
Some typical themes are loss of innocence, initiation into
maturity (known as "coming of age"), and man's
inhumanity or frailty.
Theme is not the plot.
One way to determine a works theme, is to answer the following
questions: How does the title relate to the story? What kind of
change does the protagonist undergo? Any? Why? Are any
observations on life offered up?
Determinists believe that all acts that seem to arise from a person's will are actually the result of causes that determine them. Among these causes can be found the following frames of reference, depending on the epoch and attitudes: fate or necessity (neoclassic), will of God (Calvinist), action of scientific law (Naturalist), or operation of economic forces (Marxist). For the Determinist every act and action has a deeper meaning because these acts and actions are controlled from without and are not really the result of an individual's will or choice.
Defined: The total environment for the action of a fictional work.
Established primarily through description, though narration is used also.
Close attention to clothing, manners, vocabulary, tools, money, historical references and the like will help you to determine the time and the place of the story.
Setting serves as a backdrop against which the action takes place, but it can also have an effect on the action of the story and on the behavior of the characters. The characters in Stephen Crane's short story "The Open Boat," for example, are somewhat at the mercy of their setting--they are stranded in the middle of the ocean--and are in a constant struggle against it.
Setting helps to establish the personality of the characters. What belongings surround a character often determine what he/she is like as a person or how that person sees him-/herself.
Setting can establish the customs and the culture of the characters. A character living in England will have a different way of celebrating Christmas than a person living in America; women and men in India act differently toward each other than do women and men in America; people dress differently, eat differently, worship differently, and speak differently based on where they live.
Our physical environment is the exterior landscape, since it exists outside of our minds and surrounds our bodies. The exterior landscape can be a city, forest, house, room, street, ocean, or any other physical location.
The interior landscape exists within our minds. The interior landscape is a picture of any thoughts, feelings, memories, etc., that we are aware of (that we can "see" in our conscious minds) at a given moment.
Exterior can often be used as a symbol for the interior to give us further insights into the minds of the characters.. However, exterior landscapes can also be used to show contrasts between appearance and mental state, especially if a character is confused or indecisive.
Setting can have thematic meanings. An ancient theme that arises out of setting is the conflict between City and Wilderness. In older times, when humankind's dominance over its environment was less certain than it is now, the city was viewed as a haven against the hostile forces of nature. It was also the center of culture and human endeavor. The wilderness, filled with dangerous animals, brutal weather, and other life-threatening forces (real and imagined), was seen as antagonistic towards humans and their civilizations.
--exterior, represents man's control over his environment and over nature, a refuge from the wilderness, and a center of civilization and law.
--interior, it represents the rational, the conscious, the safe, the superego.
--exterior, the abode of lawless creatures and humans; it is the unknown in which dwell dangerous animals, monsters, etc., that constantly challenge humans and their civilizations. Generally perceived as hostile and unsafe to humans, and any desert, uncultivated land, or unexplored sea is likened to the pre-Creation, primordial chaos. However, it is also the setting for journeys, visionary experiences, and quests in which the hero must prove his/her valor. The Wilderness provides the visionary with prophetic insights and the hero with an opportunity to improve status, increase wealth, and gain renown. The Western view of the wilderness as a place to conquer is derived from the Bible, in which God commands mankind to establish dominion over the earth and over the animal kingdom.
--interior, represents the subconscious or irrational, the id, the emotions (anger, fear, lust, greed, insecurity), repressed memories.
Gothic genre upsets this traditional conflict by making the house, otherwise a symbol of safety against the wilderness, the abode of monsters and of the irrational.
Pastoral works against this conflict by promoting the country as an idyllic escape from the corruptive influences of the city. Begun in ancient Rome to provide a diversion for world-weary citizens, the pastoral depicts shepherds as handsome, love-eager poets and shepherdesses as beautiful but coy objects of affection. The pastoral also calls into question the moral degeneration brought about by city life and institutions of power.
Romantic movement of the 19th century, in some ways an outgrowth of the ancient pastoral, also counters this conflict by presenting nature as a beneficial place reflective of God's presence; the city, because of the debilitating effects of machines, industry, and city living, has become the symbol of fear and danger. The city, being a human construct, is seen as faulty and at odds with natural rhythms and processes. The "return to nature" becomes an escape from the harmful influences of mankind.
Meter: the recurrence of rhythmic pattern.
Quantitative: established through units containing regular successions of long and short syllables: classical meter. Syllables considered long if they have a long or short vowel followed by two consonants. Others considered short. two short syllables equal in duration to one long syllable. Somewhat like musical notes.
Accentual: occurrence of syllable marked by stress or accent that determines the basic unit regardless of the number of unstressed syllables: old English versification and sprung meter.
Syllabic: the number of syllables in a line is fixed, though the accent varies.
Accentual-Syllabic: number of accents and syllables are fixed or nearly fixed: most common sort today.
The rhythmic unit is known as the foot; A standard foot contains two syllables. See the stress patterns below, because there you will see a variety of feet.
monometer--one foot
dimeter--two feet
trimeter--three feet
tetrameter--four feet
pentameter--five feet
hexameter--six feet
heptameter (fourteener if "iambic")--seven feet
Iambic--unstressed syllable followed by stressed syllable: "come live / with me / and be / my love."
Trochaic--accented followed by unaccented syllable. often used in children's rhymes because of sing-song quality: "Jack and Jill / went up the hill /to fetch a pail of water; /Jack fell down / and broke his crown / and Jill came tumbling after."
Anapestic--two unaccented followed by an accented syllable: "Like a child / from the womb / like a ghost / from the tomb"
Dactyll--stressed/accented syllable follow by two unaccented: mannikin
Spondaic--a foot of two accented syllables--usually monosyllabic words in succession. "Hot sun / cool fire" It's rare for a polysyllabic word to have two successive accents.
Phyrric--a foot of two unaccented syllables. Some say since there is no accent, it cannot correctly be a foot "On the / bald street / breaks the / blank day"
Rhyme: likely owes its existence to oral literatures, made it easier to remember lines/stories/myths/folklore/tales. classified according to position of rhymed syllables in the line and the number of syllables involved.
True--can, ran; boat, tote--based on sounds of vowels and succeeding consonants of accented syllables.
Sight--slant, near, off, imperfect--moved, loved
End--at the end of the line
Front--occurs at first syllable or syllables of the line (alliteration): Peter Piper Picked a Peck of Pickled Peppers.
Internal--occurs somewhere between the first and last syllable of the line
masculine--restricted to final accented syllable as in "can" and "ran."
feminine--rhyming stressed syllables followed by rhyming unstressed syllable: "fountain" and "mountain"
At first glance, or read, sonnets can be intimidating because of their rigid form, but here are some guidelines to reading them that should help you make sense of them at least on the surface level. After gaining that understanding, at least as much as is possible, can we then dig a little deeper.
The typical rhyme scheme for the above describe rhetorical pattern for the Shakespearean or English Sonnet, is this: ABAB CDCD EFEF GG. One variation on this is the Spenserian Sonnet, named after Edmund Spenser, one of Shakespeare's contemporaries. It goes like this: ABAB BCBC CDCD EE. Another variation is the Italian or Petrachan Sonnet, named after the Italian poet Petrach who is credited with the creation of the form. This form is as follows: ABBA ABBA CDECDE or CDCDCD or CDEDCE. With the Italian Sonnet, the turn comes between the second and third stanza and more space is devoted to the resolution of the situation and complication.
This should give you some information to make sense of the sonnets you read.
Nationalist fervor of country, bolstered by defeat of Spanish Armada (much of which was sunk in a storm), beginnings of world colonization and trade--both of which were reflected in literature.
Renaissance learning and interest began to be more generally felt. English language enriched by borrowings from Latin, Greek, Italian, and French. Humanist ideals (exalt the human over the divine). Verse forms such as sonnet and blank verse became more familiar.
Religious controversy: struggles between Catholics and Church of England, and also among those of the High Church (similar in many ways to the Catholic Church) and the Low Church (Puritans).
Rhetoric is stylish and self conscious, showing relish for ornate and cleverly arranged words. Depended more on rhyme schemes than tropes (metaphorical figures of speech)
Reliance on amplification, exaggerated emphasis in interest of persuasive effect
Pathetic fallacies--attribution of living qualities to inanimate objects, primarily with animalistic hostility in inanimate objects.
Fashionable/popular literature of the era is a reaction against Puritanism. (Puritans wished to purify church of England by eliminating anything remotely smacking of the Catholic Church and its pomp--doing away with superstitious rites of church (such as transubstantiation where the wafer and wine are believed to actually become the real body and blood of Jesus Christ), taking communion sitting rather than kneeling, serious observance of the Sabbath, discarding apocryphal (spurious, doubtful, divinely uninspired) books of Bible.)
Although a time of anxiety and tension, recrimination and score settling, literature marked by love of gaiety, wit, and immortality, revival of interest in science.
Nature's law: orders natural elements/physics
Celestial/heavenly law: that which the angels follow
Law of Reason: binds reasoning creatures to law which they know they are bound
Divine Law: binds men, known only because of revelation by God
Human Law: Laws that men make out by following reason or divine law
The Chain of Being: describes God's plentitude, unfaltering order, and ultimate unity. Every speck in creation has a place in the chain.
Earthly (bottom)
inamimate class: elements: earth, water, air, fire.
vegetative class: trees, bushes, weeds, etc.
sensitive class--existance, life, and feeling that has three levels
Divine
Man's soul--bridge between earthly and divine
Angels (Angles bridge the gap between god and man)
Angels: triple divisions echo the Trinity
(contemplative) Seraphs, cherubs, thrones,
(Active in thought, not deed) Dominations, Virtues, Powers
(Active) Principalities, Archangels, Angels
God
Ether: each ruled in order by the angels above
primum mobile ,(outermost of 10 coencentric circles making up the universe--that which is the cause of all movement but does not move itself.) the fixed stars, Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, the Sun, Venus, Mercury, and the Moon.
Among groups, there is one member who has Primacy:
As you might guess, this fixed system which I’ll describe in greater detail as we move on, came to be incredibly complicated and it ended up being simplified by the emergence of both Christianity and later on Protestantism. Still, as we’ll see in Shakespeare, there will be many comparisons/analogies of war is to the body politic as blood letting is to personal health, body parts to various constellations and more. The earthly is linked to the heavenly, the heavenly (meaning both the divine and those things in the sky) have a direct and profound influence on what happens on the earth among men.
This is often read as the biblical pronouncement in support of the Ptolemaic system, but some consider this a mis-reading, that the world cannot be moved in the sense that its behaviors, rotation, orbit of the sun and such, are fixed, and themselves cannot be moved. I’ll let you decide on this sort of thing.
Order is defined/viewed thusly:
The fall is seen as alienating man from himself. To regain true self knowledge man must contemplate the works of nature of which he is a part, which feeds scientific examination of the enlightenment, which goes back to the dominant view that the era is more secular than it was.
Contemplative active in neither potential or deed: Serpahs, Cherubs and Thrones
Active in potential, not deed: Dominations, Virtues, and Powers
More active, some in deed: Principalities, Archangels, Angels
Nature, which has no will, is sometimes inserted between man and the angels, along with the soul bridging the gap between man and angel, earthly and divine/celestial.
Man belongs to the
existence, life, feeling, and understanding
class. Serves as a link between earthly and divine because man has the
potential to be divine, but struggles with earthly corruption.
| Humour | Season | Element | Organ | Qualities | Ancient name | Modern | Ancient characteristics |
| Blood | spring | air | liver | warm & moist | sanguine | artisan | courageous, hopeful, amorous |
| Yellow bile | summer | fire | gall bladder | warm & dry | choleric | idealist | easily angered, bad tempered |
| Black bile | autumn | earth | spleen | cold & dry | melancholic | guardian | despondent, sleepless, irritable |
| Phlegm | winter | water | brain, lungs | cold & moist | phlegmatic | calm, unemotional | Rational |
See below for definitions of important terms
The literal meaning of "allegory" is a writing that conveys other than its literal meanings, where persons, objects, and actions within a narrative are equated to meanings that lie outside the narrative. One can also think of allegory as an extended metaphor. Edmund Spenser's The Faerie Queene is an example of an allegory. With The Faerie Queene, the action that is outside the narrative is the rule of Queen Elizabeth and the struggle of the "true" Church, that is the Church of England, over the perceived corruption of the Roman Catholic Church.
Readers must be careful not to rigidly equate characters to one dimensional notions. while Archimago in The Faerie Queene can be seen as the embodiment of corrupt doctrine, there may be more. To see Duessa as only the embodiment of duplicity and Mary, Queen of Scots, is to read too narrowly.
Captivity Narratives in Puritan Culture; propaganda of narrative tales a staple in Puritan culture
• Typically a single individual, usually female, who stands passively under the strokes of evil, awaiting rescue by the grace of God;
• Represents whole chastened body of puritan society, dual paradigm of bondage of soul and flesh, self-exile from England/Israel, all that is puritan and analogous to ancient Israel;
• Meet and reject temptation of Indian marriage and/or Indian’s cannibal Eucharist;
• Redemption by grace of God and puritan magistrates linked to regeneration of soul in conversion;
• Threats, dangers (tests of faith) result in ultimate salvation which is offered by proxy to other faithful in community.
Determinism is the belief that all acts that seem to arise from a person's will are actually the result of causes that determine them. Among these causes can be found the following frames of reference, depending on the epoch and attitudes: fate or necessity (neoclassic), will of God (Calvinist), action of scientific law (Naturalist), or operation of economic forces (Marxist) or patriarchal forces (feminism). For the Determinist every act and action has a deeper meaning because these acts and actions are controlled from without and are not really the result of an individual's will or choice. Determinism is not an absolute for most in today’s world, because such a perspective denies the complexity of humanity. Even if the future is predetermined, human actions do influence what happens, but we're controlled by a larger force of some sort. One need not submit to fate.
Didactic means, in brief, "to teach." Didacticism is the instructiveness of a work, the purpose of which is to give guidance in moral, ethical and/or religious matters. Didactic works have as their ultimate effect or meaning outside the work itself and the realms of art proper. The lesson conveyed is more important than the work conveying the lesson. If didacticism is carried too far, it is in danger of subverting the object of art or literature to lesser and ignoble purposes. The early Puritan works are more didactic than literary so such "subverting" is not of great concern.
Fatalism argues that there is no free will, that we are predetermined by larger forces to do what we do, and history has progressed in the only manner possible. Even those actions that appear "free" work toward a predetermined end. As the Borg might say, for you Star Trek fans, resistance is futile (meaning acceptance is appropriate). All events are inevitable so you may as well accept them. Don't wear a seat belt, because it's either your time, or it isn't. A seatbelt won't change things.
First Wave/Equality Feminism: It primarily focused on gaining the right of women's suffrage and other notions of equality. Focused on the sameness of god given rights, social and moral equality, acknowledge the existence of women's sexual desires, temperance, abolition of slavery (among Americans), abortion rights started in the early 19th century as a reaction to patriarchal social attitudes. Stuck in the cult of domesticity with women still confined primarily to the home.
Second Wave/Difference Feminism: greater focus on economic equality, partly through female admission to previously male only/dominated arenas in business, education and politics; and rights of minority women. The onus was on overcoming or addressing the differences between men and women.
Third Wave Feminism, resulting from an emphasis on the differences between men and women, the adherents of which probably would be considered “femi-nazis” by the likes of Rush Limbaugh. Third Wave Feminists are seen to have a more radical feminist agenda, such as those of lesbian separatists, who saw marriage and heterosexual relations as inherently bad for women (which makes the same-sex marriage push somewhat ironic). Third wave feminists emphasize differences’ between men and women and their needs, be they emotional, psychological, physical or something else.
Post-feminism is something of a backlash against second and third wave feminist notions. The fundamental claim is that feminism is no longer valid.
In literature, Feminism can be seen in "feminist critique," which is the evaluation of writing by men to look at their depiction of women and the establishment of a relationship with women readers. Gynocritcism, not a common terms, is the study of women writers and writing.
Three phases of feminist "awareness":
Showalter, Elaine, ed. New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Women, Literature, and Theory. New York: Pantheon Books, 1985.
Augustine tells us that we are given Free Will in order that we might do right in the world, that we will follow what God intended us to do. He says that "If man is good, and cannot act rightly unless he wills to do so, then he must have free will, without which he cannot act rightly. We must not believe that God gave us free will so that we might sin, just because sin is committed through free will" (73).
The big question is whether we are determined by previous events to do what we do, or whether we can act outside of these influences, whether we are free to do as we wish regardless of the circumstances. Determinists would argue that every event, including human cognition and behavior, decision and action, is causally determined by an unbroken chain of prior occurrences. Determinism is the belief that all seeming acts of the will are actually the result of causes that determine them.
Free Will might be defined as the absence of fate and/or determinism.
Saint Augustine. "On the Free Will of Choice." Medieval Philosophy. Forrest Baird and Walter Kaufman. Third Edition. 73-99.
Humors are based on Elizabethan notions of physiology, how our bodies are made and work. There are four: blood, choler, bile and black-bile, each of which is closely allied with the four elements that make up all of the universe: air, water, earth and fire. Healthy people had their humors in balance. The sick had an imbalance. Depending upon the symptoms one might exhibit, a certain excess or shortage of a particular humor might be noted and treated in kind. For instance, if one had too much optimism, if they were manic, they might have some blood let to bring them into balance. Humors were thought to be produced by the liver, based upon what one ate and drank, but they were also the result of a natural disposition--a little bit of nature and nurture--heredity and environment.
Tragic Irony: use of terms and words that the character intends to mean one thing, but to the reader/viewer in the know, actually portend the hero’s demise. An example of tragic irony occurs in Oedipus. When confronted with the situation and resolution to the plague of Thebes, Oedipus declares that he will either kill or banish the cause of this plague, not knowing yet that he is the cause. The viewer doesn't yet know this (unless they already know the play which contemporary viewers of the play did) and the other characters do not yet know this either. Viewers learn of the irony later on in the play, when we learn of Oedipus's guilt and we think back to his earlier comments.
Dramatic Irony occurs when the reader shares with the narrator/speaker knowledge of a situation or intention unknown to the other characters. An example of this would be "The Story of an Hour." We know that Mrs. Mallard is rejoicing in the freedom of her husband's death and she dies at the shock of losing that freedom upon his return. The others in the story believe she dies at being overjoyed upon his return. Readers know what all the living characters at the end don't, so we see things much differently. In Oedipus, probably the best examples include the words spoken by Teiresias in his first meeting with Oedipus. Teiresias says such things as “you yourself are the pollution of this country and “I say that you are the murderer whom you seek and “with both your eyes, you are blind: You can not see the wretchedness of your life.” For those readers who know what's going on, while others in the drama itself don't, that's dramatic irony.
With verbal irony, the meaning intended by the speaker differs from the meaning understood by one or more of the characters. An example occurs in Oedipus when he says that “whoever killed King Laios might—who knows?—lay violent hands on me—and soon.“ This is an example of verbal irony because we know so much more than what the speaker intends, particularly in relation to the story’s plot and action.
Magic Realism is a way of presenting the world that relies, on the surface, for the work to be conventionally realistic while containing contrasting elements that invade the realistic framework of the text. These contrasting elements often consist of the supernatural, myth, dream, and fantasy. Some draw no distinction between such works and pure fantasy writing, a genre in itself. This is often considered a dismissive perspective.
Quantitative: established through units containing regular successions of long and short syllables: classical meter. Syllables considered long if they have a long or short vowel followed by two consonants. Others considered short. two short syllables equal in duration to one long syllable. Somewhat like musical notes.
Accentual: occurrence of syllable marked by stress or accent that determines the basic unit regardless of the number of unstressed syllables: old English versification and sprung meter.
Syllabic: the number of syllables in a line is fixed, though the accent varies.
Accentual-Syllabic: number of accents and syllables are fixed or nearly fixed: most common sort today.
The rhythmic unit is known as the foot; A standard foot contains two syllables. See the stress patterns below, because there you will see a variety of feet.
monometer--one foot
dimeter--two feet
trimeter--three feet
tetrameter--four feet
pentameter--five feet
hexameter--six feet
heptameter (fourteener if "iambic")--seven feet
Iambic--unstressed syllable followed by stressed syllable: "come live / with me / and be / my love."
Trochaic--accented followed by unaccented syllable. often used in children's rhymes because of sing-song quality: "Jack and Jill / went up the hill /to fetch a pail of water; /Jack fell down / and broke his crown / and Jill came tumbling after."
Anapestic--two unaccented followed by an accented syllable: "Like a child / from the womb / like a ghost / from the tomb"
Dactyll--stressed/accented syllable follow by two unaccented: mannikin
Spondaic--a foot of two accented syllables--usually monosyllabic words in succession. "Hot sun / cool fire" It's rare for a polysyllabic word to have two successive accents.
Phyrric--a foot of two unaccented syllables. Some say since there is no accent, it cannot correctly be a foot "On the / bald street / breaks the / blank day"
Mimesis is Greek for "imitation" and generally taken to indicate works of literature that imitate characters on a human level, where correspondence to the physical world is understood as a model for beauty, truth and what is good. In this respect, it is the representation of nature (not as in the woods and the trees, but the world around us). Mimesis is central to Coleridge's concept of the imagination, which where the unity of essence is revealed precisely through different materialities and media. Imitation reveals the sameness of processes in nature.
Myth (loosely) Defined
Structuralist qualities of the Hero
A poem of rural people and settings or a poem treating of shepherds and rustic life in a clearly unrealistic manner. Pastoral is after the Latin for Shepherd (pastor). These shepherds often speak in courtly language and when depicted visually look more like they belong at court than on some hillside tending sheep. The pastoral often is used to create a rural/urban dichotomy, with the rural being "good," a place of life and sustenance and the urban "bad," a place of decay and degeneracy. The rural is often portrayed as the simple and revered while the urban is complex and to be avoided. Rural life is idealized and urban life, by contrast, demonized. The pastoral can be found in just about any genre of literature, in whole or part.
Sources: The Oxford Companion to English Literature and A Handbook to Literature.
Post-Colonialism deals with literature produced in countries that once were colonies of other countries, particularly the European colonial powers Britain, France, and Spain. It also deals with literature written in colonial countries and by their citizens that has colonized people as its subject matter, often addressing cultural identity in the colonized societies. Colonized people, especially of the British Empire, attended British universities; their access to education, still unavailable in the colonies, created a new criticism - mostly literary, and especially in novels. Following the breakup of the Soviet Union during the late 20th century, its former republics became the subject of this study as well. Any literature emanating from these countries and addressing subjects that concern the relationship between master and servant, colonizer and colonized, particularly in which the cultural and beliefs of the colonized are sublimated and denigrated as the culture and beliefs of the colonizer are advanced, can be looked at through the post-colonial lens, an inherently political form of literary criticism.
Calvin defines predestination as "the eternal decree of God, by which he determined with himself whatever he wished to happen with regard to every man. Not all are created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation; and, accordingly, as each has been created for one or other of these ends, we say that he has been predestined to life or to death."
"Predestination." Wikipedia. 21 April 2008. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predestination
Puritanism: springs from the idea that someone, somewhere, might be enjoying themselves. (this is a joke)
Suggestion: Keep these ideas in mind while reading the Puritan writers and preparing to write an essay on some issue taken from early American literature’s colonial period.
Progression of Puritan evolution
Puritan(ism) defined/described: (largely Calvinist in theology)
Calvinism: man is a complete ruin in need of God’s salvation; drastic intervention on God’s part needed to overtake man’s sinful nature
The above material that lacks a citation was taken and somewhat revised from Wikipedia
True--can, ran; boat, tote--based on sounds of vowels and succeeding consonants of accented syllables.
Sight--slant, near, off
imperfect--moved, loved
End--at the end of the line
Front--occurs at first syllable or syllables of the line (alliteration): Peter Piper Picked a Peck of Pickled Peppers.
Internal--occurs somewhere between the first and last syllable of the line
masculine--restricted to final accented syllable as in "can" and "ran."
feminine--rhyming stressed syllables followed by rhyming unstressed syllable: "fountain" and "mountain"
Satire is a work or approach that blends a censorious attitude with humor and wit for improving human institutions or humanity. Satirists don’t so much attempt to tear down what they attack but instead seek to inspire the target of their wit to reform themselves. The focus is generally on vice and folly. If a writer simply is abusive, they are engaging in invective. If they are making personal attacks, they are being sarcastic. As a rule, satire spares the individual to do as Joseph Addison, one of the noted 18th century English satirists directs, “to pass over a single foe to charge whole armies.” Satire generally deals less with the great sinners and criminals of the world and more often with the run of the mill fool, knave, ninny, oaf, fraud and codger. Satire is of two types: direct, usually written in the first person spoken directly to the reader or a character in the satire, or indirect, where the satire is expressed through a narrative and the characters who are the butt of the ridicule are ridiculed by what they themselves say and do. Indirect satire is the more common of the two.
Sentimentalism is a reaction against the rather immoral restoration works that in themselves were a reactions against Puritanical works of the mid-seventeenth century. In general terms, sentimentalism is divided into two groups:
The sentimental novel has also been called the novel of sensibility. This novel seeks to inculcate virtuous behavior on the part of the reader by giving them a model to imitate. The audience for such works tended to be young women (because educated, mature women, and men in general, shouldn't be wasting their time reading or writing fiction). The characters will have a heightened emotional response to events, with the aim of producing a similar response in the reader.The protagonist will generally be a young woman who encounters the world in a way that challenges and refines her naive but naturally good views.
This also contains elements of what has been termed a novel of manners, in which the novel is dominated by social custom, conventions and habits of a definite social class, one that should be aspired to. Quite often there will also be a religious component to the work depending upon when and where it was written.
Slave narratives were generally written between 1830 and 1860. They are autobiographical accounts of a slave's life, and generally their escape, which are/were part of the abolitionist movement.
Jacobs’ work received little attention before 1981 due to disputes about authorship that were laid to rest by a study of her letters. The authenticity of her writings and the events were established in 1987.
Characteristics of Female Slave Narrative (and male as well)
More on the slave narrative from Donna Campbell at Washington State University.
The Sublime is said to be characterized by nobility and grandeur that is impressive, exalted and raised above ordinary human qualities. It is said a painful idea creates the sublime passion and concentrates the mind on a facet of experience and produces a momentary suspension of rational activity, uncertainty and self-consciousness. Below are degrees of the sublime:
• Beauty—light reflected off a flower
• Weak sublime—light reflected off rocks in a river
• Sublime—turbulent nature, pleasure derived from objects that cannot sustain the life of the observer
• Full feeling sublime—overpowering turbulent nature; pleasure from violent, destructive objects
• Fullest feeling sublime—understanding immensity of universes extent and duration; pleasure of observer’s nothingness and oneness with nature.
Something that on the surface is its literal self but which also has another meaning or even several meanings. For example, a sword may be a sword and also symbolize justice. A symbol may be said to embody an idea. There are two general types of symbols: universal symbols that embody universally recognizable meanings wherever used, such as light to symbolize knowledge, a skull to symbolize death, etc., and constructed symbols that are given symbolic meaning by the way an author uses them in a literary work, as the white whale becomes a symbol of evil in Moby Dick.
An abstract concept made real/concrete through representation in person, action, and/or image. A theme is not just a subject/thing or verb/action/activity. For instance, adultery is a "thing" and of itself it cannot be a theme. However, the notion that "while adultery is generally viewed as being sinful, good can come of it" could be a theme. Similarly, "truth" is a thing, an abstract concept. It can be a theme when we suggest that "searching out the truth is not always a noble act." You can think of theme much as if it is a claim to be demonstrated or articulated through a piece of literature as it unfolds.
Tragedy is generally a play that recounts an important and causally (as in cause and effect) related series of events in the life of a person of significance, such events culminating in the unhappy catastrophe (fall from high estate to low estate, fall from grace to despair) as the result of some tragic flaw/trait, the whole treated with great dignity and seriousness. Tragedy should arouse pity and fear (for whom is open to dispute), the end of the play resulting in the release of these emotions (known as catharsis).
Transcendentalism is not as much concerned with a metaphysics that transcends daily lives than it is with a new view of the mind that replaces Locke's (blank slate) empiricist, materialistic, and passive model with one emphasizing the role of the mind itself in actively shaping experience.
Utilitarianism is the philosophy that argues that moral worth is found in the consequences of actions (act utilitarianism) or, for others, the following of the proper rules (rule utilitarianism). John Stuart Mill defines utilitarianism as being those "actions [that are] right as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." In this respect, happiness is the same as pleasure or the absence of pain. However, this is not a selfish or hedonistic happiness. The pleasures we are to seek, the pleasures that are most "right" in a utilitarian sense, are those that reside in our highest faculties, those that maximize the overall good for the greatest number. These pleasures are to be about each man developing his powers to their complete whole. Happiness, in the utilitarian sense, is described as a first principle, one for which there is no proof. Since it cannot be objectively proved that happiness is a first principle, we must, as a society, agree upon this instead.
| Jan 2 |
Jan
3 |
Jan
4 |
Jan
5 |
Jan
6 |
| Why are we here? What Shakespeare have you read? Liked? Disliked? | Historical Overview | Indepednent Sonnet Research. See directions in blog | ||
| Jan 9 |
Jan 10 | Jan 11 | Jan 12 | Jan 13 |
| Sonnet reports and discussion | "Procreation sonnets": 1-17. Read as assigned in class. | Admiring sonnets to a young man: Read 20, 29, 36 and 38. | Admiring sonnets with a thematic focus on time: 55, 60, 64, 73 and 74 | Rivalry: 79, 80, 83 and 84; |
| Jan 16 | Jan 17 | Jan 18 | Jan
19 |
Jan 20 |
| Martin Luther King, Jr Holiday | "Black" Lady sonnets: 127, 130, 131, 132, 147 | Will I am: Sonnets 135, 136, 143 | Sex and Desire in the Sonnets: 147-152 | Sonnet Readings |
| Jan 23 | Jan 24 | Jan 25 | Jan 26 | Jan 27 |
| Acting Introduction: What
ix X |
More in the vein of "What is X?" | Twelfth Night | Twelfth Night | Twelfth Night |
| Jan 30 | Jan 31 | Feb
1 |
Feb
2 |
Feb
3 |
| Merchant of Venice | Merchant of Venice | Merchant of Venice | Merchant of Venice | Drama Club Work Day |
| Feb 6 |
Feb
7 |
Feb
8 |
Feb
9 |
Feb 10 |
| Still MOV | Hamlet Act I | Hamlet Act II | Drama Club Work Day/101 Portfolios | Hamlet Act III |
| Feb 13 | Feb 14 | Feb 15 | Feb 16 | Feb 17 |
| Hamlet Act IV | Hamlet Act V & seminar practice, draft overview | Draft Response Day | Seminar I and Drama Club Work Day | Seminar I and Drama Club Work Day |
| Feb 20 | Feb 21 | Feb 22 | Feb 23 | Feb 24 |
| Presidents' Day Holiday | Literature Review I Due | Richard III | Richard III | Drama Club Work Day |
| Feb 27 | Feb
28 |
Feb
29 |
Mar
1 |
Mar
2 |
| Richard III | Richard III | Midsummer Night's Dream | Midsummer Night's Dream | Drama Club Work Day |
| Mar
5 |
Mar
6 |
Mar
7 |
Mar
8 |
Mar
9 |
| Midsummer Night's Dream | Midsummer Night's Dream | Drama Club Work Day | Literature Review II Draft Response Day | Drama Club Presentations |
| Mar 12 | Mar 13 | Mar 14 | Mar 15 | Mar 16 |
| Drama Club Presentations | Drama Club Presentations | 101 Portfolio Readings | Literature Review II Due | Dead Day: No classes! No tests! No papers due! |
| Mar
19 |
Mar 20 | Mar 21 | Mar 22 | Mar 23 |
| Final: 11:30-1:30 | Finals | Finals |