Morton
Thomas Morton described the natives better than previous colonists and explorers such as Smith did in every way. Morton admires the structure of their societies and portrays them as being almost better than the English. For example, he says, "It is admirable to behould what pastime they use." Not only this, but Morton describes the natives as being upright people with respect toward their elders and superiors. This is evident when he writes, "that a nation of uncivilized should more respect age than some nations civilized." He basically says that the younger natives were models that young English people should learn from.
He also shows a respect for their religious beliefs. He rebukes the previous writers' assupmtion that all natives are godless and describes their creation story as one resembling the Christian creation story with a man and a woman being made first, and later described that the natives believe in a catastrophe similiar to Noah's flood. In addition, he introduces the Seperatists, or Puritans as being "conspirators". The colonists from the neighboring Plymouth settlement brought false accusations against Morton's host and attempted to kill him before being stopped by a military man, and they later imprisoned him and sent him back to England as a criminal. In all, Morton dismisses many of the myths concerning New England, and the natives who inhabit it.


True that
I think that morton had a whole lot more respect for the natives than any other european did. He actually referred to them in a way that didnt degrade them. He also looked into their religius beliefs and agreed with some of the teachings that they had. He made them look more like humans than "savages", which clearly they were not.
This is true. I think that
This is true. I think that many explorers such as Harriot and Smith knew a lot more than they said about the Indians but may have been scared to say how they truly felt. Either that or they were so stuck in their ways and thoughts they couldn't see the good in another race. Morton said a lot of things that were good characteristics about the natives that the English didn't have. I really like the quote you used because it really stuck out. I'm glad we got to see another view like Morton's.
Noah's Flood
Yeah, I noticed the similarity there with the flood. It makes ya wonder... how did their religion and Christianity end up with those similar stories. In fact it almost seems from the text that their religion was very similar to old testament "Christianity," (that's not what it would have been called before Christ, approximately the year ZERO.) The creation, the idea of a family, the dominion over all creatures and plants and land, the fallen-ness of man, it's all a lot alike, minus the animal sacrifices we see in the old testament.
similiar
Yeah they even described a couple that sounds like Adam and Eve and then another man who came as a redeemer, and he sounded a lot like Christ. Christianity and the native religions seem like they merged at some point almost.
an enduring question
Pretty much every culture has what we call a "creation myth," with the word myth having no bearing on whether something is true or not. Rather it's about how the story, the myth, is a foundational element of the culture. In that case, they are very much like their Christian counterparts. There are quite a few similarities of this sort in various myths, which people take to be "evidence" that God does exist. However, there are also quite a few dissimilar creation myths, which are rarely used as evidence that God doesn't exist, but that's for another day. Bradley
Bradley
There are also a lot of
There are also a lot of contradictory thoughts on what heaven and hell are between various religions as well, but I mean hey if you believe one thing who cares what that other guy says, right? That's the mind set people have. It's impossible to either prove or disprove God's existance, so everyone just has to decide which they're more comfortable with. Am i right Mr. Bleck?